This has been added to the next version of
bsnmp from what I understand (see Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new
version of bsnmpd hasnt been released yet. I also dont have a ETA.
From: John
Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006
7:01 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them
out.
On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I
understand (see
Sumer of Code
?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:11 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Should we be using this vendor tree of theirs instead?
On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea
.
On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My thoughts are no unless we control when we do checkouts, meaning we
keep a private bsnmp tree and somehow add it to the fbsd tree when we
kick off a buildworld. My feeling is the vendor tree is sort of like
tracking current, where
that out.
On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh btw my community patch is in head so it shouldn't be needed.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:42 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense
Cool.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:07 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib
Thast what I am planningon doing if it works (ship currents bsnmpd)
On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=757
I've lost my test box, so I can't verify this just yet.
Sorry for the delay.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:06 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [pfSense
Are you sure its running in DMA mode?
From: Szasz
Revai Endre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005
9:35 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Slow IO
operations
Hello
I have an old 233mhz computer w/ 32 ram, udma33 hdd, that's what
What do you think about using the compress option? I haven't tested it
before but I'm guessing you'll save some BW.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 4:28 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Anonymous
Well if you think it could be a general FreeBSD issue, the best was to test
would be to just create a FreeBSD cdrom. You can download the ISO from here.
ftp://ftp11.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/6.0/6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso
If you can try to install it. My thinking is it should
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=altqapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+6.0-RELEASE+and+Portsformat=html
-Original Message-
From: Jure Pečar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 11:47 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] two problems
On
15:46 * Check-in [8362]: Use mibII_interfaces.c.1130101189.diff (By
sullrich)
15:44 * Check-in [8361]: Add BSNMPD operstatus patch (By sullrich)
Does that mean the patches weren't applying correctly?
-
To unsubscribe,
Is that something some one will have to pay for?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 3:05 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Tutorial under construction.
Apologies to everyone for the 5 MB list
Just wondering, what kind of serial cable do you have?
-Original Message-
From: David Strout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:26 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: Re: [pfSense Support] Serial port console ... ?
it looks like it does not like to see all these states
corresponding
to the same target port number.
Scott
On 10/31/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:39 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 10/31/05, Fleming, John
I didn't see but are you using Nat? If so do things change with Nat
disabled? Also could you try disabling the Scrub option and seeing if
that makes a difference?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Zaitsev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 10:55 AM
To:
Send the output.txt of...
date /tmp/output.txt
netstat -m /tmp/output.txt
netstat -in /tmp/output.txt
sysctl hw.em0.stats=1 /tmp/output.txt
sysctl hw.em1.stats=1 /tmp/output.txt
sysctl hw.em2.stats=1 /tmp/output.txt
Can you send these while the machine is normal and when the machine
client to have 10K(ish) of open TCP sessions.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 1:28 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Network Device pooling
On 10/31/05, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Yea, you need to run all the command from the console (video, serial
whatever)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Zaitsev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 1:57 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Locked out in bridging mode
Hi,
After the tests
No route to host seems a little odd. Where did you start the ftp from
and where was it going to (lan - dmz)?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Swartzendruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 10:24 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] passive ftp
Oh sorry I didn't read this very well. I'm guessing the problem has to
do with the ftp proxy (pftpx) saying the data channel is on 10.0.0.2.
227 Entering Passive Mode (10,0,0,2,191,87) - 10,0,0,2
-Original Message-
From: Dan Swartzendruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October
Hmm do you have any telnet servers you could try to connect to thought
the tunnel? I'm wondering if you're running into a MSS/no fragmentation
issue.
It might be nice to see a
tcpdump -ni $lan-if -w output.pcap 'host $your_client_ip'
from the firewall. Let it capture for 5 mins while you try the
Are you bridging any interfaces with the wan interface?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:29 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] suggestion for LAN rule menu
On 10/7/05, Dan Swartzendruber [EMAIL
Title: bochs + pfsense.
So how is everyone doing testing with bochs? If anyone is using virtual network interfaces could they please send me the bochs network config?
Thanks!
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=257,4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:31 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] SNMP for pflog0
PFSense gurus-
I am using MRTG to capture interface statistics
: [pfSense Support] SNMP for pflog0
At 11:37 AM 10/6/2005, Fleming, John \(ZeroChaos\) wrote:
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=257,4
Thanks. Since I'm not an expert, that should keep me up twiddling with
MRTG
for a few nights!
(grin)
Really, thanks, theres a lot of good info there.
--
[EMAIL
Oops, wrong address. :)
(Doh!)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: A little note about vlans and netgraph in FreeBSD.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=38062+0+current/freebsd-arch
I think I ran into the related problem. The vlan device calls
IFQ_HANDOFF directly versus the normal output bits so you can't
use netgraph etc. I broke up
Just something to look out for. My laptop would do odd things if the
audio was muted. I seem to remember it blocking forever if say the
device was muted or something along those lines. Let me also say this
was under 4.x and that sound card never worked after 5.2.1 so its
possible it was a funky
is supported - because I only have 3 pci slots, and need 4
interfaces) The 3C509 is an ISA card - and works just fine
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 3:49 pm, Chris Buechler wrote:
Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) wrote:
3c509 or 3c905?
The 509 is an ISA card which means you need to run the 3com
Btw the microcode is loaded via the option link0 which is passed to
ifconfig. I'm not sure where that is set but a few grep for link0 in
/etc/ should show you.
-Original Message-
From: J B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:22 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
I'm guessing something from gcc is missing. I've seen this error before
when include files are missing (/usr/include). See if something very
simple will compile.
vi test.c
#include stdio.h
main (){
printf(hello yorld\n);
}
I think that will compile ;)
gcc -o test test.c
./test
Should spit
FreeBSD is having love issue (see no) with your cdrom. It could be..
1. bad cdrom drive
2. bad cdrom
3. bad cable
4. sucky IDE chipset.
5. FreeBSD bug.
If you get a chance try a default install (just for testing) of FreeBSD
Beta 5 (or whatever the lastest beta of 6.0 is) and see if you get the
on the LAN interface just to see if
I can
get to it when this happens again. Maybe it's just the bridging from
mt
WAN to OPT 1 that takes a dump?
- Original Message -
From: Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 12
that takes a dump?
- Original Message -
From: Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 12:55 AM
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Argg! My PfSense just died!
I'd like to see dmesg output from the new box as well. What kind
I'd like to see dmesg output from the new box as well. What kind of nics
do you have in this box? It really sounds like we need someway to gather
as much information as possible during the next outage without rebooting
the box. Off the top of my head some of the things I would like to know
are..
- Original Message -
From: Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:53 AM
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Argg! My PfSense just died!
Might be a long show but also get
bridge0: Ethernet address: ac:de:48:4e:3f:64
##
- Original Message -
From: Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:10 PM
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support
Just an FYI this is why you see the error message. You should only be
worried if you see it twice.
# Mount all. If it fails run a fsck.
/sbin/mount -a || /sbin/fsck -y /sbin/mount -a || /sbin/fsck -y
The error message you've seen came from the first /sbin/mount -a. fsck
then cleaned all the
Its hard to say without some kind of diagram and ip listing.
-Original Message-
From: Ted Crow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:11 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Running multiple routed subnets on LAN
interface
I am (still) running
We don't need no stinking visio!
-Original Message-
From: Ted Crow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:28 PM
To: Bill Marquette
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Running multiple routed subnets on LAN
interface
I'll try to bump up to the
My guess is 172.16.11.x isn't being nated through the firewall. Tcpdump
on WAN interface should reveal if its even getting out and if so what
address is it being sourced with. Not sure what could be going on with
OPT1, OPT3 and OPT4. could you send the output of netstat -rn also?
(route table)
I'd also like to know which rl cards these are. Can you send the output
of pciconf -lv?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:31 AM
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] iperf question
On 8/18/05, Randy
43 matches
Mail list logo
