Has anyone using and **really working** with spamd inside pfsense 2.0
BETA 4. Cos i don't get any log, block or result using spamd.
My version:
Current version: 2.0-BETA4
Built On: Wed Aug 25 23:36:00 EDT 2010
Thanks for attention...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Zhu Sha Zang zhushaz...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Has anyone using and *really working* with spamd inside pfsense 2.0 BETA 4.
Not that I'm aware of. Probably doesn't work. I'm not sure it works on
any version. May not be hard to fix if you poke at the underlying
bits.
Tim A. wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Hey this is great, thank you!
Can you please do a diff -rub and then email the patch as an
attachment to coret...@pfsense.org and I will get it promptly
committed.
Done.
I've also attached a patch for spamd_db.php that makes the GUI more
accurate and
Sawadeekap
After a failed upgrade from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3, I made a fresh install from
pfSense Full, installed SpamD Package, but it didn't forward any Mails
to the internal Exchange Server.
I used the default settings from the package, added my internal exchange
server (172.22.1.x), and some
Em 14-12-2009 21:20, Fabian Abplanalp escreveu:
Sawadeekap
After a failed upgrade from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3, I made a fresh install
from pfSense Full, installed SpamD Package, but it didn't forward any
Mails to the internal Exchange Server.
I used the default settings from the package, added my
On 12/15/09 1:03 AM, zhushazang wrote:
Em 14-12-2009 21:55, zhushazang escreveu:
Sorry guy, i need advise u about a this change in permission.
I really don't know if a process like that with root permitions are
secure.
Then, think better before make this change in your system.
att
Yes,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko evg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:
Lyle Giese wrote:
Peter Roosenboom wrote:
hello,
On pfsense board I cannnot find out whether spamd is working on pfsense
1.2.3 or not.
Most messages on this topic suggest that it is not working.
I would like
Support] spamd
Lyle Giese wrote:
Peter Roosenboom wrote:
hello,
On pfsense board I cannnot find out whether spamd is working on pfsense
1.2.3 or not.
Most messages on this topic suggest that it is not working.
I would like to install it, but is it worth the trouble trying? Maybe
special
hello,
On pfsense board I cannnot find out whether spamd is working on pfsense 1.2.3
or not.
Most messages on this topic suggest that it is not working.
I would like to install it, but is it worth the trouble trying? Maybe special
hacks are needed to make it work?
Please help me to get rid of
Peter Roosenboom wrote:
hello,
On pfsense board I cannnot find out whether spamd is working on pfsense 1.2.3
or not.
Most messages on this topic suggest that it is not working.
I would like to install it, but is it worth the trouble trying? Maybe special
hacks are needed to make it work?
filter.inc.patch: necessary for the correct operation of spamd
Table whitelist exists but was never populated or used. Fixed.
Table blacklist exists but was never populated. Fixed.
Broken rule logic for whitelist entries, either (rdr) or (no rdr). Fixed.
Comments:
I guess no one noticed
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Tim A. pfse...@lists.goldenpath.org wrote:
filter.inc.patch: necessary for the correct operation of spamd
Table whitelist exists but was never populated or used. Fixed.
Table blacklist exists but was never populated. Fixed.
Broken rule logic for
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Can you please do a diff -rub
you want a recursive diff of the whole system?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Tim A.pfse...@lists.goldenpath.org wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Can you please do a diff -rub
you want a recursive diff of the whole system?
No, sorry I was not more clear. Just a diff -rub of filter.inc
Scott
Scott Ullrich wrote:
want a recursive diff of the whole system?
No, sorry I was not more clear. Just a diff -rub of filter.inc
No, no, I'm unfamiliar with the process. I'm sure you were perfectly clear.
Ok, but I'll have to clean up first.
A diff -rub in my current setup is messy.
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Hey this is great, thank you!
Can you please do a diff -rub and then email the patch as an
attachment to coret...@pfsense.org and I will get it promptly
committed.
Done.
I've also attached a patch for spamd_db.php that makes the GUI more
accurate and informative in
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Tim A.pfse...@lists.goldenpath.org wrote:
No, no, I'm unfamiliar with the process. I'm sure you were perfectly clear.
Ok, but I'll have to clean up first.
A diff -rub in my current setup is messy. I guess I'm working a bit bass
ackwards here.
I copied the
Scott Ullrich wrote:
All you need to do is use the -rub option with diff the next time.
When you try to apply your patch it will not work.
I thought there might be a problem. When I tested the patch it
complained but worked out anyway. So I figured it was ok.
Will -rub em from now on.
Hi,
I just tried to install spamd today, but it seems to block all my messages.
I've waited 25 minutes, and still no mail arrives.
I also tried to add some blacklist servers from the openbsd/spamd page,
but it seems not to really work.
It just kept three entries in the greylist, and nothing
I have been successfully using the spamd package for about 2 weeks at
one of my client sites, and it is working wonderfully. It has reduced
the amount of spam that the site's email server was receiving from about
15000 per day to about 50 to 75 per day.
I configured the package as follows:
Vaughn,
You should re-visit the spamhaus terms of service for their Zen
service. It is not free for commercial use as you are apparently doing.
Otherwise, thank you for the feedback on the package.
-Gary
Vaughn L. Reid III wrote:
I have been successfully using the spamd package for about
Gary,
Thanks for the suggestion. My client is a not-for-profit library. They
own the hardware. I provide consulting services/labor. So, I believe
that their usage is appropriate. I do not sale pre-configured appliances.
Gary Buckmaster wrote:
Vaughn,
You should re-visit the
So you don't config anything in the SpamD settings at all ?
The nextMTA shouldn't be your mailserver ?? I tried with and without,
but still no mail gets delivered...
If I send a mail (from a spamless address), should the mail be visible
in the SpamD database ??
And how much time will it take
On 5/1/08, Michel Servaes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you don't config anything in the SpamD settings at all ?
The nextMTA shouldn't be your mailserver ?? I tried with and without, but
still no mail gets delivered...
Yep.
If I send a mail (from a spamless address), should the mail be
It still won't react... I waited more than 30 minutes, but it still
doesn't come through...
I see in the System log a lot of spamd(1080), disconnect after xxx
seconds...
This is the snip in my rules.debug :
spam table
table whitelist persist
table blacklist persist
table spamd persist
table
What I just come to think of... should I disable the rule of pfsense
itself ?
I have used pfSense for almost 2 months now, and have opened port 25 in
the very beginning... might it be that this open port is still there,
and that spamd also has an open port ?
I think I have the sitation
Spamd Database shows only white listed host,
also unable to blacklist ips. any I Ideas?
Thanks guys
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public IP --- NAT --- Public IP
not work, need proxy
Con fecha 27/7/2007, Sean Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I'm trying to set the NextMTA as an external IP for a good reason, but here's
what I've found. Any ideas would be appreciated.
Here's what I have figured out so far.
I'm trying to set the NextMTA as an external IP for a good reason, but here's
what I've found. Any ideas would be appreciated.
Here's what I have figured out so far.
external IP - pfsense (spamd) - next MTA (internal IP)
This works fine
external IP - pfsense (spamd) - next MTA (public
Here is the log file I'm getting when trying to install spamd. I have a
fresh install of pfsense 1.0.1. The file apkg_spamd-3.7_3.tbz is
created in the /tmp directory but is a zero byte file.
# cat pkg_mgr_spamd.log
Beginning package installation.
Downloading package configuration file...
installed pfsense 1.2beta1
On 6/7/07, Sean Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the log file I'm getting when trying to install spamd. I have a
fresh install of pfsense 1.0.1. The file apkg_spamd-3.7_3.tbz is created
in the /tmp directory but is a zero byte file.
# cat
Hello!
How can I see if external providers for blacklists are working?
Going to the shell my spamd.conf looks like:
all:\
:whitelist:blacklist:SpewsL1:ChinaCIDR:KoreaCIDR:
whitelist:\
:method=file:\
:white:\
:file=/var/db/whitelist.txt:
blacklist:\
:black:\
:msg=Sorry, you spammed us
I have noticed that the log never changes in size from the default
creation of 9.8k. It appears that my SPAMD service is not logging. If I
delete the log it is never recreated unless I re-install the package.
When I go to view the rrd graphs for Spamd I receive the message There
is no
I'm giving SpamD and have it all basically configured, although I'm
stuck at the NextMTA setting. This setting appears to assume only a
single MTA behind pfSense. Is this correct? Is there a way to specify
multiple transport mappings for multiple MTAs or would this require me
installing
On 4/27/06, Gary Buckmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm giving SpamD and have it all basically configured, although I'm
stuck at the NextMTA setting. This setting appears to assume only a
single MTA behind pfSense. Is this correct? Is there a way to specify
multiple transport mappings for
Scott,
Both of those additions would be truly awesome and I'm willing to offer
up some testing resources for when you have free time to mess with these
additions. Thanks very much!
-Gary
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 4/27/06, Gary Buckmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm giving SpamD and
36 matches
Mail list logo
