Ok, so I spent sometime on this, this morning.
One of the problems I had yesterday during update_file.sh (on 085.4).. it
somehow broke OPT1(sync) and kept making it disabled. So carp would never come
up, once I got this sorted by going to 085.6 I could go forward.
So ..
1) I brought router2 b
First of all, little description of my situation.
I am in a Hight school room, where we acces to the lan via dhcp througt a proxy.
I have also behind the school connection and adsl connection (ppp0)
I am using a Server (connected to the school lan, to the adsl and to
my computer) to determine t
Hi,
I have a problem with pfSense's dhcp server since 0.85.x (I guess it wasn't an
issue in 0.84.6).
I have two lan interfaces and both serves as dhcp server, of course not
overlapping.
My problem is that on lan2 (opt2 - xl0) a dynamic ip address is always issued
despite it
shouldn't be bec
Are these two logical networks on the same physical network? I'm
noticing the request came in on both fxp0 and xl0 - that seems kinda
odd.
Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.2.254 (192.168.2.4)
from 00:12:79:ad:c6:fc (TRC-dc5100) via fxp0: wrong network.
Sep 28 14:35:03 dhcpd: DHCPREQ
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:26:28 -0500
Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are these two logical networks on the same physical network? I'm
> noticing the request came in on both fxp0 and xl0 - that seems kinda
> odd.
Yes, both network cards are connected to the same switch, but I guess as t
On 9/21/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a portion that I have not converted as of yet. I don't have
> any type of ipv6 devices to test with, etc. I'll see what I can do
> but this may be feature that is marked for removing.
Could it be that this is fixed in the latest ve
Yes, I made some changes to the ipv6 code. I cannot test however so I
am driving blindly here.
Scott
On 9/28/05, Jeroen Geusebroek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/21/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That is a portion that I have not converted as of yet. I don't have
> > any
You need to update_file.sh /etc/rc.bootup as well. The carp
interfacs are brought up at the very end now.
Scott
On 9/28/05, Frimmel, Ivan (ISS South Africa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so I spent sometime on this, this morning.
>
> One of the problems I had yesterday during update_file.sh
On 9/28/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I made some changes to the ipv6 code. I cannot test however so I
> am driving blindly here.
I'd be happy to test. But you can easily get a free IPv6 tunnel from a broker.
Just a suggestion ;)
--
Jeroen
-
On 9/28/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only thing left to try is:
> http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootTroubleShooting
>
I had the same problem with different machines. Only in my case if i
wait (5 minutes or so)
it will finally come through.
--
Jeroen
--
With my machine it just throw out several of these messages but goes through
them at once and it's running fine after that.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeroen Geusebroek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. September 2005 16:34
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re:
Well I did everything that the wiki support said to do with no luck. Just
for the record I went ahead and installed M0n0Wall on it with no issues.
I would rather use PFSense and really need to find a fix. I am scheduled to
put this box in place tomorrow so any more help would be greatly
appreciated
I have been testing pssense to use it to replace a Firebox we currently
have on one of our connections. The Firebox currently does
webfiltering. I tried to get this working with pfsense and ran into
some issues. I installed the pfsense developer version (84 I think). I
loaded the ports info and
That's rather bizarre. The developer version is not restricted in any
way. If anything it could still be missing bits from FreeBSD but I am
not sure about that.
Scott
On 9/28/05, Robert Goley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been testing pssense to use it to replace a Firebox we currently
>
I'm guessing something from gcc is missing. I've seen this error before
when include files are missing (/usr/include). See if something very
simple will compile.
vi test.c
#include
main (){
printf("hello yorld\n");
}
I think that will compile ;)
gcc -o test test.c
./test
Should spit out "h
First some background. I have a multinat configuration working in monowall
(mutiple wan IP addresses to 1 or many internal IPs) so pfsense is not so
foreign to me. I've tried setting up a similar environment in pfSense
0.85.2. For simplicity, I first tried a basic http port forwarding nat
confi
Is choparp running on your system? ps awux | grep chop from a shell
will tell us.
Scott
On 9/28/05, James Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First some background. I have a multinat configuration working in monowall
> (mutiple wan IP addresses to 1 or many internal IPs) so pfsense is not so
I use a squid 2.5.Stable10 ( install from freebsd 6.0-beta3 and ports/
make package ) + SquidGuard ( install from freebsd 6.0-beta3 and
ports make package ) + DB3 ( install from freebsd 6.0-beta3 and
ports make package ) + bigurlblacklist.
Work very well for web filtering and I use a rule on
Just to trying to sum this up, You installed (1)binary packages from
freebsd, (2) binary packages compiled on a separate freebsd machine, or
(3) binaries compiled from the pfsense development version via the ports
system? That was not clear from the pluses and parenthesis. I would
appreciate the
Is the Pfsense
capable of source based routing as is described here http://en.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/iproute2.html?
/this is only for description of problem, i know that Pfsense is no Linux
:-}/
Thank
you.
Regards-Robo.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
Its running for the VIP, vr0 is the wan (I added the x's).
root 485 0.0 0.3 1192 764 ?? Ss1:30PM 0:00.00
/usr/local/sbin/choparp vr0 auto xxx.xxx.149.241/27
At 12:51 PM 9/28/2005, you wrote:
Is choparp running on your system? ps awux | grep chop from a shell
will tell us.
Well that should be responding to proxy arp.. Weird. If you need
this working now change the virtual ip to a carp type. In the
meantime I'll run some tests.
On 9/28/05, James Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its running for the VIP, vr0 is the wan (I added the x's).
>
> root 485 0.0
In a multi-wan environment on pfSense this can be handled using
advanced outbound nat.
Scott
On 9/28/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is the Pfsense capable of source based routing as is described here
> http://en.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/iproute2.html?
> /this is only for d
I think I know what's going on. I just noticed the cidr/27. Should be /32.
The subnet is /27, but I'm pretty sure this should be /32 (255.255.255.255).
I'll check.
At 01:58 PM 9/28/2005, you wrote:
Well that should be responding to proxy arp.. Weird. If you need
this working now change the
It was the subnet. Reset Pfsense back to defaults, added rules (shows /32);
works now.
Thanks
At 02:14 PM 9/28/2005, you wrote:
I think I know what's going on. I just noticed the cidr/27. Should be /32.
The subnet is /27, but I'm pretty sure this should be /32 (255.255.255.255).
I'll check.
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:14:32 -0700
James Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I know what's going on. I just noticed the cidr/27. Should
> be /32. The subnet is /27, but I'm pretty sure this should be /32
> (255.255.255.255).
Yes, aliased IPs allways use /32 if the parent IP is on the sa
Hmmm, interesting. I'll look into why it's setting a /27.
--Bill
On 9/28/05, James Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its running for the VIP, vr0 is the wan (I added the x's).
>
> root 485 0.0 0.3 1192 764 ?? Ss1:30PM 0:00.00
> /usr/local/sbin/choparp vr0 auto xxx.xxx.149.2
Hello,
I had read the thread at Aug 26 and found that some pfSense's user able
to access 1:1 NATTed service in LAN segment, but when I try it today,
it's failed.
My testing environment:
- the public IP xx.xx.xx.46 1:1 NAT to 10.0.138.9
- proxy ARP the xx.xx.xx.46
- allow any to any access to xx.x
I got it to work, but did NOT use Proxy ARP. Just
used the 1:1 NAT.
Jason
J Ellingson
From: Simon SZE-To [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:43 PMTo:
support@pfsense.comSubject: [pfSense Support] 1:1 N
i think, it's the vlan stuffs.
if i dont choose to setup vlan, everything went fine.
if i choose to setup vlan, it ask to reboot.
i think the vlan config is not yet saved when it reboot.
so, after reboot, it comes up with vlan setup again...
On 9/29/05, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I
i know this has probably been answered in previous posts but i didn't
see them. i'm wondering if / how i can move my monowall xml file over to
pfsense. i tried to just restore, thinking that i had seen a previous
post saying it was ok, it but killed everything and i had to
re-install. i would
31 matches
Mail list logo