Re: Crash in SM 2.0.1 when in mail

2009-12-25 Thread Daniel
David Wilkinson wrote: JAS wrote: I just updated to SM2.0.1 from SM2 as per upgrade pop up. Had no problems at all with SM2. I am confused. I have not received any popup to upgrade from SM 2.0 to 2.0.1, and if I go to the SeaMonkey home page the download is still SM 2.0. What gives? This is

Re: 2.0.1 mail issues

2009-12-25 Thread Jens Hatlak
Bill Davidsen wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: As a workaround, try deleting the OE Contacts address book. If OE did not work well, what would you say if microsoft tell us : As a workaround, try deleting the SM Contacts address book. ??? I would say OE should ignore SM and

Re: Change font/font size in Seamonkey2.0

2009-12-25 Thread Karl
Hi Stanimir, my problem is the to large text in the seamonkey UI. And all previous version (until 1.1.18)works fine and has adapt the underlaying system UI of eCS/os2. Now i tried to use the userchrome-example.css in profile/chrome modified it and stored it under the name userchrome.css

Re: Change font/font size in Seamonkey2.0

2009-12-25 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:55:28 +0100, /Karl/: my problem is the to large text in the seamonkey UI. And all previous version (until 1.1.18)works fine and has adapt the underlaying system UI of eCS/os2. May be it is related to the source of your build (its configuration) - do you build it on your

Re: SM2.01 seems to keep all my site visit history ...

2009-12-25 Thread Ant
On 12/25/2009 3:12 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: Instead I found it works fine if you just open the History window, select all (Ctrl+A), copy it (Ctrl+C), paste it into your favorite text editor and check the line count. It says something like 8200 here, with the oldest entry from 2009-10-04

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread fel
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:16:19 -0800, Rufus n...@home.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: I understand the risks involved with fooling around with about:config if one doesn't know what one is doing...workarounds are fine for experienced users, but not for the masses. Absolutely. Us masses

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread Phillip Jones
fel wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:16:19 -0800, Rufusn...@home.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: I understand the risks involved with fooling around with about:config if one doesn't know what one is doing...workarounds are fine for experienced users, but not for the masses. Absolutely.

Re: 2.0.1 mail issues

2009-12-25 Thread Ray_Net
Farelf wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: As a workaround, try deleting the OE Contacts address book. If OE did not work well, what would you say if microsoft tell us : As a workaround, try deleting the SM Contacts address book. ??? I would

Re: Happens every Year .

2009-12-25 Thread NoOp
On 12/24/2009 09:49 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:52:02 -0800, NoOp wrote: On 12/24/2009 12:32 PM, question wrote: Merry Xmas to all In the USA there is a template for this: To My Democrat Friends: You are obviously not an American because the correct terminology

SM2: Problems With SeaMonkey Default Theme 1.0

2009-12-25 Thread art
1) In the navigator window Personal Toolbar, the rightmost bookmark item will occasionally overlap the dropdown menu icon depending on the overall window size. This appears to be unique to the bookmark list. The location edit box does not exhibit this behavior (it does not overlap the history

Re: Printout Password Manager Entries?

2009-12-25 Thread Evan Davidson
Philip Chee wrote: On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 00:02:53 +0100, Martin Freitag wrote: Tom schrieb: I have entries in Password Manager since 1999 and many are no longer used and there are many duplicates. In order to prune out old entries, I'd like to be able to print out all of the entries. Is there

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: fel wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:16:19 -0800, Rufusn...@home.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: I understand the risks involved with fooling around with about:config if one doesn't know what one is doing...workarounds are fine for experienced users, but not for the

Re: off line view of web sites

2009-12-25 Thread Barry Edwin Gilmour
Philip Chee wrote: On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 11:58:39 +0800, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: n...@home wrote: »Q« wrote: Innews:kkqdnzy5qeknu6_wnz2dnuvz_gudn...@mozilla.org, Try Philip Chee's modified version at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modified.html#scrapbook. Note that you also need his

Re: Happens every Year .

2009-12-25 Thread Phillip Jones
NoOp wrote: On 12/24/2009 09:49 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:52:02 -0800, NoOp wrote: On 12/24/2009 12:32 PM, question wrote: Merry Xmas to all In the USA there is a template for this: To My Democrat Friends: You are obviously not an American because the correct

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread NoOp
On 12/25/2009 04:07 PM, Rufus wrote: ... ...your interface should be dumbed down to accommodate the dumbest user that you are targeting your product to, or that you expect would possibly want to try your product. Simpler is better, useful instructive information provided is always even

Re: Happens every Year .

2009-12-25 Thread NoOp
On 12/25/2009 04:37 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: On 12/24/2009 09:49 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:52:02 -0800, NoOp wrote: On 12/24/2009 12:32 PM, question wrote: Merry Xmas to all In the USA there is a template for this: To My Democrat Friends: You are

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread Phillip Jones
Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: fel wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:16:19 -0800, Rufusn...@home.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: I understand the risks involved with fooling around with about:config if one doesn't know what one is doing...workarounds are fine for experienced users,

Re: Happens every Year .

2009-12-25 Thread Phillip Jones
NoOp wrote: On 12/25/2009 04:37 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: On 12/24/2009 09:49 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:52:02 -0800, NoOp wrote: On 12/24/2009 12:32 PM, question wrote: Merry Xmas to all In the USA there is a template for this: To My Democrat Friends:

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread NoOp
On 12/25/2009 04:39 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/25/2009 04:07 PM, Rufus wrote: ... ...your interface should be dumbed down to accommodate the dumbest user that you are targeting your product to, or that you expect would possibly want to try your product. Simpler is better, useful instructive

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?till not an answer

2009-12-25 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 24/12/2009 03:29, Rufus told the world: SM 1.1.18 does what I need, and the way I need it done. And I've been looking over alternatives left and right - Firefox...nogo. Camino, Stainless, Chrome, and Safari all look like they have common roots. Almost, but not quite.

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread Rufus
NoOp wrote: On 12/25/2009 04:07 PM, Rufus wrote: ... ...your interface should be dumbed down to accommodate the dumbest user that you are targeting your product to, or that you expect would possibly want to try your product. Simpler is better, useful instructive information provided is

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread Rufus
Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: fel wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:16:19 -0800, Rufusn...@home.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: I understand the risks involved with fooling around with about:config if one doesn't know what one is doing...workarounds are fine

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?till not an answer

2009-12-25 Thread Rufus
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 24/12/2009 03:29, Rufus told the world: SM 1.1.18 does what I need, and the way I need it done. And I've been looking over alternatives left and right - Firefox...nogo. Camino, Stainless, Chrome, and Safari all look like they have common roots.

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread Rick
Phillip Jones wrote: fel wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:16:19 -0800, Rufusn...@home.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: I understand the risks involved with fooling around with about:config if one doesn't know what one is doing...workarounds are fine for experienced users, but not for the

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread Stefan
Rufus skriver: Then there was the whole of the new default more Mac-like interface...I was only able to tolerate that about four days, then I replaced it with the other Modern one. And I'm a Mac user...I do have to say, the folks on Thunderbird did a way better job making a Mac-like Mac

Re: SM2: Problems With SeaMonkey Default Theme 1.0

2009-12-25 Thread Stefan
art skriver: 1) In the navigator window Personal Toolbar, the rightmost bookmark item will occasionally overlap the dropdown menu icon depending on the overall window size. This appears to be unique to the bookmark list. The location edit box does not exhibit this behavior (it does not overlap

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread Rufus
Stefan wrote: Rufus skriver: Then there was the whole of the new default more Mac-like interface...I was only able to tolerate that about four days, then I replaced it with the other Modern one. And I'm a Mac user...I do have to say, the folks on Thunderbird did a way better job making a

Re: SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

2009-12-25 Thread NoOp
On 12/25/2009 05:09 PM, Rufus wrote: NoOp wrote: ... What if you grandmother would like to use SM because you recommended it? Or your 3rd grade aged nephew? Actually, my 89 y.o. grandmother, her 60 y.0. live-in nurse, my 2nd grade nephew, and multiple relatives that haven't the

Re: SM2: Problems With SeaMonkey Default Theme 1.0

2009-12-25 Thread Phillip Jones
Stefan wrote: art skriver: 1) In the navigator window Personal Toolbar, the rightmost bookmark item will occasionally overlap the dropdown menu icon depending on the overall window size. This appears to be unique to the bookmark list. The location edit box does not exhibit this behavior (it

Re: Happens every Year .

2009-12-25 Thread Philip Chee
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:37:06 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: Democrat refer in this discussion to the person who votes Democratic party affiliation. While Republican refers either, the Party itself or the Party Affiliation You Can be a Liberal Democrat, or Conservative Democrat or Moderate