Re: Troubleshooting Information

2012-02-12 Thread Chris Ilias
On 12-02-12 11:54 PM, _David E. Ross_ spoke thusly: The page I see when I select [Help> Troubleshooting Information] in SeaMonkey looks very much the same as the page when I select [Help> Troubleshooting Information] in Thunderbird. Is this page generated by a common component of those applicat

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread chicagofan
sean nathan bean wrote: chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling y

Any new about updating QuoteColors for SeaMonkey 2.5 and later?

2012-02-12 Thread PhillipJones
I'd like use in SM 2.9 and later. I am still using 2.0.14 because QuoteColors doesn't and some others. Using the system that use the thick grey lines to show threads is totally confusing. I wish some one would change the Max Version and put it out for us to use. Or get the Author or someone t

Re: hotmail/live & imap/pop3 settings?

2012-02-12 Thread sean nathan bean
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 11/02/2012 19:28, sean nathan bean told the world: further google searching reveals hotmail/live doesn't support imap at all... my mistrust of all things google sent me back to microsoft looking for an alternative... only to find, windows mail solutions st

Troubleshooting Information

2012-02-12 Thread David E. Ross
The page I see when I select [Help > Troubleshooting Information] in SeaMonkey looks very much the same as the page when I select [Help > Troubleshooting Information] in Thunderbird. Is this page generated by a common component of those applications? If I were to write a bug report applicable to

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread sean nathan bean
chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it got at time

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread chicagofan
Lance Courtland wrote: chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling yo

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread Lance Courtland
chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it got at time

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread chicagofan
JD wrote: chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread chicagofan
David H. Durgee wrote: chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling yo

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread chicagofan
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: chicagofan wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: chicagofan wrote: ..and both have text and symbols that are almost illegible for these old eyes. Fixing that would be a matter of tweaking operating system settings to something you like. I've adjusted the Win

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread JD
chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it got at time

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
chicagofan wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> chicagofan wrote: >>> ..and both have text and symbols that are almost illegible for these >>> old eyes. >> >> Fixing that would be a matter of tweaking operating system settings to >> something you like. > > I've adjusted the Win7 settings as

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread David H. Durgee
chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it got at time

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread chicagofan
km wrote: chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread chicagofan
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: chicagofan wrote: ..and both have text and symbols that are almost illegible for these old eyes. Fixing that would be a matter of tweaking operating system settings to something you like. I've adjusted the Win7 settings as much as I can, but SM reduces to 75%

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread km
chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it got at time

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread km
chicagofan wrote: I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it got at time

Re: SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
chicagofan wrote: > ..and both have text and symbols that are almost illegible for these > old eyes. Fixing that would be a matter of tweaking operating system settings to something you like. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high

SM 2.7 - Anyone using news servers besides Mozilla server?

2012-02-12 Thread chicagofan
I don't know if it's because I added the Mozilla server first, which worked OK for awhile, but when I tried to add eternal-september.org all I could get was a news account with no connection. Couldn't download newsgroups, and I won't waste time telling you how bad it got at times. I just need

Possible 2.7 bug with Flash

2012-02-12 Thread Frank
Having downloaded and used SM 2.7.1 I've noticed when playing videos on Youtube that the menu toolbar blanks out and becomes unusable. At the same time I am unable to load new web pages. This has happened several times now. The only way round this is to exit SM and then reload it when things a

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread A Williams
Misak Khachatryan wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 12.02.2012 08:27, Misak Khachatryan wrote: --- Original Message --- SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as one program. The problem with an all-in-one browser+mail application is that if one component crashes then

Re: Another Down Load Problem (2.7.1)

2012-02-12 Thread Larry S.
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Larry S. wrote: That's three in a row. First it was 2.6.1, then 2.7, and now 2.7.1. In each case, I attempted to download through "check for updates", and in each case SM installed and ended with the Release Notes/Changes page. However, when I leave the page and attem

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Jay Garcia
On 12.02.2012 08:54, Philip TAYLOR wrote: --- Original Message --- > > > Jay Garcia wrote: > >> With FF and TB both running, ALT+TAB to switch from one to the other. Or >> just click the one that is minimized to the task bar. ;-) > >>> With /ONLY/ FF and TB both running, ALT+TAB to switc

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Misak Khachatryan
Jay Garcia wrote: On 12.02.2012 08:27, Misak Khachatryan wrote: --- Original Message --- SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as one program. The problem with an all-in-one browser+mail application is that if one component crashes then so does the other one.

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Jay Garcia wrote: With FF and TB both running, ALT+TAB to switch from one to the other. Or just click the one that is minimized to the task bar. ;-) With /ONLY/ FF and TB both running, ALT+TAB to switch from one to the other. but most people will have more than just two applications r

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Jay Garcia
On 12.02.2012 08:32, Philip TAYLOR wrote: --- Original Message --- > > > Misak Khachatryan wrote: > >> SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as >> one program. > > Don't really care about memory, but the last point is its sole raison > d'etre for me. > Ctrl+1 to

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
oppiman wrote: > ... Beauregard T. Shagnasty @ 2012-02-12 14:48 > >> Personally, I use Thunderbird and Firefox, and I'm stickin' with 'em. >> The wife is the SeaMonkey user on this computer -- so we each have our >> own set. > > You see, that is one thing I like about Chrome, the multiple > user/p

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Jay Garcia
On 12.02.2012 08:27, Misak Khachatryan wrote: --- Original Message --- > SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as > one program. The problem with an all-in-one browser+mail application is that if one component crashes then so does the other one. If the browser comp

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread oppiman
... WLS @ 2012-02-12 15:33 > There is a multiple user/profile feature with Firefox, Thunderbird, and SeaMonkey. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_manager Thanks, didn't know that. -- MJO ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozil

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Kertesz Laszlo
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:48:04 -0600 "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote: > oppiman wrote: > > > I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using > > Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of > > FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installin

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread WLS
On 02/12/2012 09:16 AM, oppiman wrote: > ... Beauregard T. Shagnasty @ 2012-02-12 14:48 > >> Whatever you do, don't uninstall Firefox. It is *always* good to have >> multiple browsers, for several reasons. > You are right. That's why I don't want to get rid of FF completely. > >> Possibly the odd a

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Misak Khachatryan wrote: SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as one program. Don't really care about memory, but the last point is its sole raison d'etre for me. Ctrl+1 to open browser, Ctrl+2 to open mail client. That's really all I want. Philip Taylor __

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Misak Khachatryan
oppiman wrote: Hello, I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF with one tool. What functionality would I loo

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Misak Khachatryan
oppiman wrote: Hello, I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF with one tool. What functionality would I loo

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread oppiman
... WLS @ 2012-02-12 15:05 > As previously noted by BTS, you would lose some extension, and theme compatibility With SeaMonkey mail you would gain. 1. Mail always opening to the Inbox. 2. Unread, Total and Size Columns in the Folder Pane. 3. Right now, I can't think of the others. I haven't us

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread oppiman
... Beauregard T. Shagnasty @ 2012-02-12 14:48 > Whatever you do, don't uninstall Firefox. It is *always* good to have multiple browsers, for several reasons. You are right. That's why I don't want to get rid of FF completely. Possibly the odd add-on/extension or toolbar where the developer ha

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread WLS
On 02/12/2012 07:56 AM, oppiman wrote: > Hello, > I've been using TB and FF for a long time. > Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me > But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. > So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF > with one to

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
oppiman wrote: > I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using > Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of > FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to > replace TB and FF with one tool. Whatever you do, don't uninst

Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread oppiman
Hello, I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF with one tool. What functionality would I loose? What would

Re: Another Down Load Problem (2.7.1)

2012-02-12 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
Larry S. wrote: That's three in a row. First it was 2.6.1, then 2.7, and now 2.7.1. In each case, I attempted to download through "check for updates", and in each case SM installed and ended with the Release Notes/Changes page. However, when I leave the page and attempt to start SM, I get "XULRun