Edmund --
For a more complete list of major changes [2] in SeaMonkey 2.13.1,
see the What's New in SeaMonkey 2.13.1 section of the Release Notes
[3],
[3] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.13/
I see no such section -- in fact, the text What's New in SeaMonkey
2.13.1
n...@vtresources.com wrote:
On Friday, October 5, 2012 8:55:16 AM UTC-5, Daniel wrote:
Tom wrote:
I should add that I subsequently ran a 'chkdsk' on my system to see if hard
drive errors could be to blame. Nothing showed up; no system events or any
other indicators of a processing error.
G. Ross wrote:
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/11/2012 04:52 AM, Daniel wrote:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120826
SeaMonkey/2.12
In the last few days, I've caught up on about two weeks of posts in
m.s.seamonkey and m.general, and somewhere, in those
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/11/12 6:11 PM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/11/12 4:52 AM, Daniel wrote:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0)
Gecko/20120826
SeaMonkey/2.12
In the last few days, I've caught up on about two weeks of posts in
Edmund Wong ew...@pw-wspx.org wrote in message
news:_m6dnfvup-ebu-xnnz2dnuvz_jadn...@mozilla.org...
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1]
now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as
A Williams wrote:
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/11/12 6:11 PM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/11/12 4:52 AM, Daniel wrote:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0)
Gecko/20120826
SeaMonkey/2.12
In the last few days, I've caught up on about two weeks of
Daniel wrote:
Link (2) gives the very detailed comment that Nothing but security
fixes and link (3) just mentions SM 2.13.1 but gives no differences
between SM 2.13 and SM 2.13.1 and the wiki page is as good as blank!!
Changes between minor versions of a release are only to be found on the
Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I
have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update. Why
is this?
I'm not going to further update SM if I have to do these big, slow full
updates.
Updated very quickly and easily here using Windows 7
Desiree wrote:
[...]
Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I
have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update. Why
is this?
I'm not going to further update SM if I have to do these big, slow full
updates.
I assume you use Windows,
On 10/11/2012 10:52 AM David E. Ross submitted the following:
On 10/11/12 4:52 AM, Daniel wrote:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120826
SeaMonkey/2.12
In the last few days, I've caught up on about two weeks of posts in
m.s.seamonkey and m.general, and
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb:
Even so, why would v. 2.12.1 elicit such a dire warning?
I was referring to the
Warning! You're using an old stable version of SeaMonkey.
quoted in the original post.
And the reply to that is Because it has some grave security issues that
are fixed in 2.13.*
Sandy schreef:
Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I
have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update.
Why
is this?
I'm not going to further update SM if I have to do these big, slow full
updates.
Updated very quickly and easily here
On 10/13/2012 7:51 AM PT, W3BNR typed:
Using Edit/Preferences/Advanced/Cache I changed the setting of the
files to
C:/Seamonkey/Cache
Using the same window you can 'clear cache' (I use a click of the 'PrefBar'
setting to do this).
I also Delete the entire C:/SeaMonkey/Cache directory before
On 10/13/12 7:51 AM, W3BNR wrote:
On 10/11/2012 10:52 AM David E. Ross submitted the following:
On 10/11/12 4:52 AM, Daniel wrote:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120826
SeaMonkey/2.12
In the last few days, I've caught up on about two weeks of posts in
On 10/13/2012 08:15 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb:
Even so, why would v. 2.12.1 elicit such a dire warning?
I was referring to the
Warning! You're using an old stable version of SeaMonkey.
quoted in the original post.
And the reply to that is Because it has some
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated with Foxfire and Sea Monkey. So what
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated with Foxfire and Sea Monkey.
... i would like a mail notifier for when i am using the browser
and receive a message it would automatically, say change the color
of the browser so i now. i always miss the little 'you have mail' msgs
and this would hlp. is it possible or does it already exist???
Mr. Kevin W Mc Auley
1107
Mr. Kevin W Mc Auley wrote:
... i would like a mail notifier for when i am using the browser
and receive a message it would automatically, say change the color
of the browser so i now. i always miss the little 'you have mail' msgs
and this would hlp. is it possible or does it already exist???
When upgrading from 2.12.01 (Lightning version 1.7) to 2.13.01,
SeaMonkey does a check for compatible add-ons. The Found Compatible
Add-Ons for Lightning comes back as Lightning 1.8.b1.
* Don't install 1.8b1!*
Lightning 1.8b1 hassome serious bugs with adding new events (as I
discovered after
I recently received and updated my SeaMonkey program to ver. 2.13.1, thru the
automatic update notice service, on my Gateway Laptop using Windows7.
My problem is that the headings (Subject, From, Date To), that were always immediately above the individual email message bodies, are no longer
humptydumpty wrote:
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated with
22 matches
Mail list logo
