Re: Microsoft Outlook and Seamonkey Mail

2016-10-04 Thread Alex Beauroy
On 05/10/2016 00:13, Keith N. McKenna wrote: NFN Smith wrote: Alex Beauroy wrote: Thanks a lot for your quick assistance on the matter. My wife wanted to try Microsoft office for a month; although I recommended Open Office. She said that she wanted to synchronize her Windows Phone calendar

Re: Microsoft Outlook and Seamonkey Mail

2016-10-04 Thread Keith N. McKenna
NFN Smith wrote: > Alex Beauroy wrote: >> Thanks a lot for your quick assistance on the matter. My wife wanted to >> try Microsoft office for a month; although I recommended Open Office. >> She said that she wanted to synchronize her Windows Phone calendar with >> the Desktop. >> So I thought I

Re: Microsoft Outlook and Seamonkey Mail

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
Alex Beauroy wrote on 04/10/2016 19:10: On 04/10/2016 17:29, NFN Smith wrote: Alex Beauroy wrote: Hi everybody!!! Is there someone here using both Microsoft Outlook and SeaMonkey Mail & Newsreader simultaneously? If yes, what should be your recommendations to get everything running

Re: Microsoft Outlook and Seamonkey Mail

2016-10-04 Thread NFN Smith
Alex Beauroy wrote: Thanks a lot for your quick assistance on the matter. My wife wanted to try Microsoft office for a month; although I recommended Open Office. She said that she wanted to synchronize her Windows Phone calendar with the Desktop. So I thought I should keep on using SeaMonkey as

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread uku69
Ray_Net schrieb: Hi ! The link must not be a link, just a pure text like: FRITZ!Box Über HTTPS: 87.147.32.46 hi again, of course... i wrote the wrong words. :-( I'm sorry! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Adobe Flash Plugin Update

2016-10-04 Thread Gerry Hickman
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: There are two "update now" links, on two different pages, that act differently. 1) At SeaMonkey's own Add-ons Manager, a plugin known to be outdated will be listed thus: XXX is known to be vulnerable and should be updated. Update now. This text hyperlink

Re: Microsoft Outlook and Seamonkey Mail

2016-10-04 Thread Alex Beauroy
On 04/10/2016 17:29, NFN Smith wrote: Alex Beauroy wrote: Hi everybody!!! Is there someone here using both Microsoft Outlook and SeaMonkey Mail & Newsreader simultaneously? If yes, what should be your recommendations to get everything running well Thanks in advance for your assistance!!

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote on 04/10/2016 11:47: Hi Ray, But it's still detected as a SCAM. Have look of my last post where I suggest a modification of the mail sent. found out the same some mitutes ago. However - i've contacted the manufacturer of the fritz!box and hope to get a response, that

Re: Microsoft Outlook and Seamonkey Mail

2016-10-04 Thread NFN Smith
Alex Beauroy wrote: Hi everybody!!! Is there someone here using both Microsoft Outlook and SeaMonkey Mail & Newsreader simultaneously? If yes, what should be your recommendations to get everything running well Thanks in advance for your assistance!! Why do you want to run both

Re: Adobe Flash Plugin Update

2016-10-04 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Chris Ilias wrote: On 03/10/2016 2:06 PM, Gerry Hickman wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: Here's another example of a blocked message https://blocklist.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p1246 Okay, I just wanted to clarify, because Mozilla doesn't offer plugins, and doesn't have a plugins

Re: Adobe Flash Plugin Update

2016-10-04 Thread Chris Ilias
On 03/10/2016 2:06 PM, Gerry Hickman wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: Here's another example of a blocked message https://blocklist.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/blocked/p1246 Okay, I just wanted to clarify, because Mozilla doesn't offer plugins, and doesn't have a plugins site. :) The page at

Re: Adobe Flash Plugin Update

2016-10-04 Thread WaltS48
On 10/03/2016 03:49 PM, Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 03/10/2016 21:23: On 10/03/2016 03:06 PM, EE wrote: WaltS48 wrote: The best way to check is probably going to Adobe remove the check marks for the Optional offers and click the Install Now button. I

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Daniel
On 4/10/2016 7:29 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote on 04/10/2016 10:12: On 4/10/2016 7:23 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't really understand, because if you are the sender, you can change the content of your mail. I have tested sending to myself: test1

Microsoft Outlook and Seamonkey Mail

2016-10-04 Thread Alex Beauroy
Hi everybody!!! Is there someone here using both Microsoft Outlook and SeaMonkey Mail & Newsreader simultaneously? If yes, what should be your recommendations to get everything running well Thanks in advance for your assistance!! Best Regards @lex

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Uwe R. Kunzmann
Hi Ray, > But it's still detected as a SCAM. > Have look of my last post where I suggest a modification of the mail sent. found out the same some mitutes ago. However - i've contacted the manufacturer of the fritz!box and hope to get a response, that will solve this problem. I'll post a follow-up

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
uku69 wrote on 04/10/2016 11:07: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Yes. If you click the link in Ray_Net's message, SM won't take you right there. First it will warn you: SeaMonkey thinks this website is suspicious! It may be trying to impersonate the web page you want to visit. Most legitimate

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
uku69 wrote on 04/10/2016 10:54: Ray_Net schrieb: TEST 6 FRITZ!Box über HTTPS: https://87.147.32.46;>https://87.147.32.46 and the scam is detected not because the real url is not the url shown - BUT because the url is an ip-adress. when you have an ip-adress

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread uku69
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Yes. If you click the link in Ray_Net's message, SM won't take you right there. First it will warn you: SeaMonkey thinks this website is suspicious! It may be trying to impersonate the web page you want to visit. Most legitimate websites use names instead of numbers.

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Ray_Net wrote: uku69 wrote on 04/10/2016 10:31: Ray_Net schrieb: So the best idea is that you forward me your offending mail at my mailbox. Done - thanks! Hi ! Thanks for forwarding I have found the culprit I have done the test number 6 mimicking your offending mail - this is what

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread uku69
Ray_Net schrieb: TEST 6 FRITZ!Box über HTTPS: https://87.147.32.46;>https://87.147.32.46 and the scam is detected not because the real url is not the url shown - BUT because the url is an ip-adress. when you have an ip-adress You don't known where you will

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
uku69 wrote on 04/10/2016 10:31: Ray_Net schrieb: So the best idea is that you forward me your offending mail at my mailbox. Done - thanks! Hi ! Thanks for forwarding I have found the culprit I have done the test number 6 mimicking your offending mail - this is what I have:

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread uku69
Ray_Net schrieb: So the best idea is that you forward me your offending mail at my mailbox. Done - thanks! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
Daniel wrote on 04/10/2016 10:12: On 4/10/2016 7:23 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't really understand, because if you are the sender, you can change the content of your mail. I have tested sending to myself: test1 http://dyn.dns.org;>Fritz Perfectly ACCEPTED when

Re: Vimeo.com's logged home page doesn't show videos correctly.

2016-10-04 Thread Ant
On 10/3/2016 9:02 PM, NoOp wrote: NoOp wrote: ... I finally got SM2.45 installed on WinXPPro, and with a clean test profile the video plays. So I reckon that you'd need to work down (maybe 2.43?) to 2.40 to see where it finally dies. WinXP is a PITA for me as it's still on VMWare and slow

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Daniel
On 4/10/2016 7:23 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't really understand, because if you are the sender, you can change the content of your mail. I have tested sending to myself: test1 http://dyn.dns.org;>Fritz Perfectly ACCEPTED when downloaded I have tested sending to myself:

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote on 03/10/2016 22:50: another idea - what especially marks an "internet address"? The correct link sample will be as following: https://dyn.dns.org;>Fritz!Box - may cause the "!" this behaviour? I have done another test as per your example. This mail contains: TEST