Re: [ SOLVED ] Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread WaltS48
On 4/26/19 7:20 PM, Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 27-04-19 00:03: On 4/26/19 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 26-04-19 19:30: Ray_Net wrote: You are probably true ...but it's a pity that SM modify the text-color (changing to GREY) of the html-signature where the color

[ SOLVED ] Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread Ray_Net
WaltS48 wrote on 27-04-19 00:03: On 4/26/19 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 26-04-19 19:30: Ray_Net wrote: You are probably true ...but it's a pity that SM modify the text-color (changing to GREY) of the html-signature where the color is BLACK. I think that i found the

Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread WaltS48
On 4/26/19 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 26-04-19 19:30: Ray_Net wrote: You are probably true ...but it's a pity that SM modify the text-color (changing to GREY) of the html-signature where the color is BLACK. I think that i found the solution - using about:config I do

Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread Ray_Net
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 26-04-19 19:30: Ray_Net wrote: You are probably true ...but it's a pity that SM modify the text-color (changing to GREY) of the html-signature where the color is BLACK. I think that i found the solution - using about:config I do a search for 99 and I found

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice

2019-04-26 Thread WaltS48
On 4/26/19 2:36 PM, NFN Smith wrote: Daniel wrote: Nice find. This issue should be reported to the web site owners to sniff SM's UA correctly. Ant, years ago, it was suggested that a better solution would be if, rather then sniffing for "Firefox", 'They' sniffed for "Gecko" which is/was

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice

2019-04-26 Thread NFN Smith
Daniel wrote: Nice find. This issue should be reported to the web site owners to sniff SM's UA correctly. Ant, years ago, it was suggested that a better solution would be if, rather then sniffing for "Firefox", 'They' sniffed for "Gecko" which is/was used in the User Agent of Firefox,

Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Ray_Net wrote: You are probably true ...but it's a pity that SM modify the text-color (changing to GREY) of the html-signature where the color is BLACK. I think that i found the solution - using about:config I do a search for 99 and I found the "msgcompose.text_color" variable with "user

Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread WaltS48
On 4/26/19 12:10 PM, Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 26-04-19 16:05: On 4/26/19 9:15 AM, Daniel wrote: Ray_Net wrote on 26/04/2019 5:08 PM: Normally I compose mail in HTML format. All goes well except that the HTML signature: beginning with:   is modified this way:    HOW to avoid

Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread Ray_Net
WaltS48 wrote on 26-04-19 16:05: On 4/26/19 9:15 AM, Daniel wrote: Ray_Net wrote on 26/04/2019 5:08 PM: Normally I compose mail in HTML format. All goes well except that the HTML signature: beginning with:   is modified this way:    HOW to avoid this modification ? Hmm!! I just

Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread WaltS48
On 4/26/19 9:15 AM, Daniel wrote: Ray_Net wrote on 26/04/2019 5:08 PM: Normally I compose mail in HTML format. All goes well except that the HTML signature: beginning with:   is modified this way:    HOW to avoid this modification ? Hmm!! I just checked and I, apparently, don't have

Re: How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread Daniel
Ray_Net wrote on 26/04/2019 5:08 PM: Normally I compose mail in HTML format. All goes well except that the HTML signature: beginning with:  is modified this way:   HOW to avoid this modification ? Hmm!! I just checked and I, apparently, don't have the word 'body' anywhere in my

Re: Staying alive

2019-04-26 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
What is needed mostly are helping hands. No volunteers/devs no SeaMonkey in the long term. You can only do so much with money if you don't have the time to support paid people. The plan is to discontinue 2.49 after 2.49.5. 2.49.5 is more or less at ESR 60.2. Further backporting is too costly

How to have a BLACK body text in the Signature Part ?

2019-04-26 Thread Ray_Net
Normally I compose mail in HTML format. All goes well except that the HTML signature: beginning with:  is modified this way: HOW to avoid this modification ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice

2019-04-26 Thread Daniel
Ant wrote on 25/04/2019 6:55 PM: On 4/24/2019 2:12 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Brian Mailman wrote: Windows 10 Seamonkey 2.48 Hi, I'm now receiving a notice of "Unsupported Browser" and that my Seamonkey is "outdated" when I try to go to davita.com . The notice recommends Firefox, among

Re: Boolean Expressions in filters ..... Possible??

2019-04-26 Thread Daniel
NFN Smith wrote on 26/04/2019 4:55 AM: Daniel wrote: I'm trying to set up some filters to apply to some/all of my UseNet groups, and I think they would effectively be Boolean Expressions, so I'm wondering if they are possible?? Some examples might be . 1.    If Lines>99 Total Posts=1

Re: Unsupported Browser Notice

2019-04-26 Thread Ant via support-seamonkey
On 4/25/2019 2:14 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Ant wrote on 25-04-19 10:55: On 4/24/2019 2:12 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Brian Mailman wrote: Windows 10 Seamonkey 2.48 Hi, I'm now receiving a notice of "Unsupported Browser" and that my Seamonkey is "outdated" when I try to go to davita.com . The