Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 23/01/21 20:12:
Daniel wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 22/01/21 20:04:
Curious - I can see the posts in that thread. Not just the headers,
the content as well.
Now to your other hypothesis: I read/write these posts via Seamonkey
Mail/News on the
no...@nonospam.org wrote:
SM 2.49.3.
I would be very careful with that site.
My Bluhell fire wall blocks the site.
Allowing the script to run takes over my SM browser.
This line does bad things:
Dept>Stack(d)}});var vb=new
RegExp("^("+Ib+")(?!px)[a-z%]+$","i"),rb=function(a){var
On 23/01/2021 14:56, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
no...@nonospam.org wrote:
Do I understand correctly that Imperva is security software the site
is using to block access from "unapproved" browsers? If so, IMHO the
SeaMonkey team at least needs to take steps to prevent this from
locking up
Frank-Rainer Grahl a écrit :
jcteyssier wrote:
Edmund Wong a écrit :
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.6.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
PS: Yeah, somewhat a canned message. Currently in the middle of a
jcteyssier wrote:
Edmund Wong a écrit :
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.6.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
PS: Yeah, somewhat a canned message. Currently in the middle of a bunch
of things while doing
Edmund Wong a écrit :
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.6.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
PS: Yeah, somewhat a canned message. Currently in the middle of a bunch
of things while doing release, so my
no...@nonospam.org wrote:
Do I understand correctly that Imperva is security software the site is
using to block access from "unapproved" browsers? If so, IMHO the
SeaMonkey team at least needs to take steps to prevent this from locking
up the browser as is happening now. I know how to kill
Do I understand correctly that Imperva is security software the site is
using to block access from "unapproved" browsers? If so, IMHO the
SeaMonkey team at least needs to take steps to prevent this from locking
up the browser as is happening now. I know how to kill the process with
Task
On 23/01/2021 09:18, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
no...@nonospam.org wrote:
...>
Two possible workarounds here:
1 - about:config and then modify
general.useragent.compatMode.strict-firefox (you may well have to
restart Seamonkey before the change becomes active).
...
UA spoofing didn't
no...@nonospam.org wrote:
https://www.jewelosco.com
This is the site for a major grocery store and pharmacy chain. It locks
up SeaMonkey v2.53.5.1 on a fully updated Windows 10 Pro system. Try to
do anything and it shows "Not Responding".
It is necessary to use Task Manager to kill the
Daniel wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 22/01/21 20:04:
Daniel wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 22/01/21 08:44:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 1/21/21 3:29 PM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Trying to access the same posting, the top-level one for this
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.53.6.
So please check out [1] or [2].
Thanks to all involved.
Edmund
PS: Yeah, somewhat a canned message. Currently in the middle of a bunch
of things while doing
12 matches
Mail list logo
