On 12/18/2011 10:29 AM PT, Ant typed:
I e-mailed pkg-mozilla-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org to confirm
this. This 32-bit and 64-bit stuff is confusing! Heh.
I got an e-mail reply from Mike Hommey about IceApe for Debian
overnight. It is confirmed that my Iceweasel installation is 64-bit
On 12/18/2011 11:21 AM PT, Hartmut Figge typed:
Ant:
OK. So I can't mix 32-bit and 64-bit. Where do I put the 32-bit Flash
plugins for 32-bit SM then since I can't find its plugins directories?
You have your 32-bit-SM2 in ~/bin/seamonkey2 and your 32-bit Flash in
~/flash. First i recommend a
Ant:
>OK. So I can't mix 32-bit and 64-bit. Where do I put the 32-bit Flash
>plugins for 32-bit SM then since I can't find its plugins directories?
You have your 32-bit-SM2 in ~/bin/seamonkey2 and your 32-bit Flash in
~/flash. First i recommend a rename to ~/bin/seamonkey2_32 and
~/flash_32 to r
On 12/18/2011 10:09 AM PT, WLS typed:
SM still did not see my Flash plugin. Debian's IceWeasel/Firefox
v3.6.24
(packages from "deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports
iceweasel-3.6" through apt-get) had no problems using it from
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so; shouldn't SM b
Hmm. I don't have any nsbrowser and browser-plugin (well except for its
readme):
$ locate nsbrowser
$ locate browser-plugin
/usr/share/doc/totem-mozilla/README.browser-plugin
Hmm!
--
"It is not enough to be busy, so are the ants. The question is: what are
we busy about?" --Henry David Thoreau
On 12/18/2011 9:22 AM PT, Hartmut Figge typed:
hafi@i5_64 ~ $ grep MOZ ~/.bashrc
MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH=/usr/lib/nsbrowser/plugins
export MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH
64-bit versions of SeaMonkey check the usr/lib64 folder, not the 32-bit
usr/lib folder.
hafi@i5_64 ~ $ ls -l /usr/lib
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 14
On 12/18/2011 9:13 AM PT, WLS typed:
SM still did not see my Flash plugin. Debian's IceWeasel/Firefox v3.6.24
(packages from "deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports
iceweasel-3.6" through apt-get) had no problems using it from
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so; shouldn't SM be
On 12/18/2011 01:05 PM, Ant aliandika:
> On 12/18/2011 9:13 AM PT, WLS typed:
>
SM still did not see my Flash plugin. Debian's IceWeasel/Firefox
v3.6.24
(packages from "deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports
iceweasel-3.6" through apt-get) had no problems using it fro
On 12/18/2011 12:01 PM, Hartmut Figge aliandika:
> Ant:
>
>> SM still did not see my Flash plugin. Debian's IceWeasel/Firefox v3.6.24
>> (packages from "deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports
>> iceweasel-3.6" through apt-get) had no problems using it from
>> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/
WLS:
>On 12/18/2011 12:01 PM, Hartmut Figge aliandika:
>> hafi@i5_64 ~ $ grep MOZ ~/.bashrc
>> MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH=/usr/lib/nsbrowser/plugins
>> export MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH
>
>64-bit versions of SeaMonkey check the usr/lib64 folder, not the 32-bit
>usr/lib folder.
hafi@i5_64 ~ $ ls -l /usr/lib
lrwxrwxrwx
On 12/18/2011 12:01 PM, Hartmut Figge aliandika:
> Ant:
>
>> SM still did not see my Flash plugin. Debian's IceWeasel/Firefox v3.6.24
>> (packages from "deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports
>> iceweasel-3.6" through apt-get) had no problems using it from
>> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/
Ant:
>SM still did not see my Flash plugin. Debian's IceWeasel/Firefox v3.6.24
>(packages from "deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports
>iceweasel-3.6" through apt-get) had no problems using it from
>/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so; shouldn't SM be checking
>here too?).
Ma
Hello!
I downloaded install_flash_player_11_linux.x86_64.tar.gz from Adobe's
web site and seamonkey-2.5.tar.bz2 from Mozilla's web site. I extracted
Flash into /home/flash and SM into my ~/bin/seamonkey2 (only for myself).
I noticed new SM v2.5 does not see Flash plugin or ANY plugins
(about
13 matches
Mail list logo
