Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-09-01, Slugracing wrote:
Slugracing wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote:
[...]
I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to
another browser. the stalling and memory
On 2020-09-01, Slugracing wrote:
> Slugracing wrote:
>> Nuno Silva wrote:
>>> On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote:
>>>
Nuno Silva wrote:
> On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote:
>>> [...]
>> I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to
>> another browser. the
WaltS48 wrote:
On 9/1/20 12:40 AM, Slugracing wrote:
Slugracing wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote:
[...]
I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to
another browser. the stalling and memory
On 9/1/20 12:40 AM, Slugracing wrote:
Slugracing wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote:
[...]
I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to
another browser. the stalling and memory usage has now
Slugracing wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote:
[...]
I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to
another browser. the stalling and memory usage has now gotten out of
control. since we move to
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote:
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote:
[...]
I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to
another browser. the stalling and memory usage has now gotten out of
control. since we move to the 2.53 series my
On 2020-08-19, Slugracing wrote:
> Nuno Silva wrote:
>> On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote:
[...]
>>> I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to
>>> another browser. the stalling and memory usage has now gotten out of
>>> control. since we move to the 2.53 series my ram
meagain wrote on 18-08-20 16:37:
Original Message
EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21:
Lance Courtland wrote:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web
browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then
Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have
Edward wrote:
Fedora 32, x86_64: seamonkey-2.53.3-3.fc32.x86_64
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND
4766 edward 20 0 3463452 625444 174552 S 2.7 16.6 7:08.80
seamonk+
The above is from 'top' as of right now. As I am not on YouTube
Nuno Silva wrote:
On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Should I hand you a tissue so that you can whine quietly and in
private?
He is telling you he has an issue, just like most of us do. Flipping
him off like that is child like.
I too have come to a fork in the road
On 2020-08-19, Ray_Net wrote:
> meagain wrote on 18-08-20 16:37:
>> Original Message
>>> EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21:
Lance Courtland wrote:
> It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web
> browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993,
On 2020-08-18, Edward wrote:
> Nuno Silva wrote:
>
>> Are you using the binaries from https://www.seamonkey-project.org/ or is
>> it a distribution-compiled version?
>>
>> If it is a distribution version, can you please see if the same happens
>> with the binaries from the project website?
>
> I
meagain wrote on 18-08-20 16:37:
Original Message
EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21:
Lance Courtland wrote:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web
browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then
Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have
Gerry Hickman wrote:
Edward wrote:
I have noticed increased memory usage with SeaMonkey, using the
Fedora-supplied package, when listening to music either through
YouTube or a web site, after it's been running for a while.
This could actually be something Linux is doing relating to the usage
Edward wrote:
I have noticed increased memory usage with SeaMonkey, using the
Fedora-supplied package, when listening to music either through YouTube
or a web site, after it's been running for a while.
This could actually be something Linux is doing relating to the usage of
memory, because I
Original Message
EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21:
Lance Courtland wrote:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web
browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape
Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the
quantity
On 2020-08-18, Slugracing wrote:
> Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>
>> Should I hand you a tissue so that you can whine quietly and in
>> private?
>
> He is telling you he has an issue, just like most of us do. Flipping
> him off like that is child like.
>
> I too have come to a fork in the road and
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Should I hand you a tissue so that you can whine quietly and in private?
He is telling you he has an issue, just like most of us do. Flipping him
off like that is child like.
I too have come to a fork in the road and am now looking to move to
another browser. the
AndrésH wrote:
EE escribió:
Lance Courtland wrote:
By the way, the website of eldiario.es , a "new" online newspaper in Spain ,
has recently refurbished its site. And the login process as a user/member of
the paper doesn't work in SM 2.53.3. Before the change of the site, everything
worked
EE escribió:
Lance Courtland wrote:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web
browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape
Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the
quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks, configs, spoofs, and
On 8/16/2020 1:19 PM, EE wrote:
Why use Chrome? It is spyware, and reports where you browse back to
Google. I made my default browser Pale Moon, and I like it. I have
other chromium browsers, but not Chrome.
If you use Pale Moon you can continue using SeaMonkey. Waste of time
if you are
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 16-08-20 01:14:
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21:
Lance Courtland wrote:
Parting is such sweet sorrow.
Lance
Why use Chrome?
Because Chrome works with ZOOM ... and a lot of sites have problem
with SM, per example, You can fill a form but the XMIT
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
EE wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
Lance
Why use Chrome? It is spyware, and reports where you browse back to
Google. I made my default browser Pale Moon, and I like it. I have
other chromium browsers, but not Chrome.
If you use Pale Moon you can continue
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21:
Lance Courtland wrote:
Parting is such sweet sorrow.
Lance
Why use Chrome?
Because Chrome works with ZOOM ... and a lot of sites have problem with SM,
per example, You can fill a form but the XMIT button did not work using SM.
Should I
Lance Courtland wrote on 15-08-20 22:59:
Ray_Net wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote on 15-08-20 02:27:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web
browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then
Netscape Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by
the
Ray_Net wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote on 15-08-20 02:27:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web
browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape
Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the
quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks,
EE wrote on 15-08-20 19:21:
Lance Courtland wrote:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web
browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape
Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the
quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks,
Lance Courtland wrote on 15-08-20 02:27:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web
browser. I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape
Navigator, then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the
quantity and complexity of fixes, tweaks, configs,
EE wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
Lance
Why use Chrome? It is spyware, and reports where you browse back to Google.
I made my default browser Pale Moon, and I like it. I have other chromium
browsers, but not Chrome.
If you use Pale Moon you can continue using SeaMonkey. Waste of
Lance Courtland wrote:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser.
I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator,
then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity and
complexity of fixes, tweaks, configs, spoofs, and kluges, each
On 08/14/2020 07:27 PM, Lance Courtland wrote:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey ...
I use SeaMonkey 2.49 under Debian with *NO* problems _whatsoever_.
I started with Netscape Communicator under whatever flavor of Widoze was
current back in the day.
Lance Courtland wrote:
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser.
I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator,
then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity and
complexity of fixes, tweaks, configs, spoofs, and kluges, each
On 2020-08-15, Lance Courtland wrote:
> Ken Rudolph wrote:
>> Lance Courtland wrote:
>>> Ken Rudolph wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
> I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I
> like a lot. I have managed to make email links clicked in SM
> Email open in
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I like
a lot. I have managed to make email links clicked in SM Email open
in Chrome, which is now my default.
Could you specify how you
Lance Courtland wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I like a
lot. I have managed to make email links clicked in SM Email open in
Chrome, which is now my default.
Could you specify how you managed this feat? I
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I like a
lot. I have managed to make email links clicked in SM Email open in
Chrome, which is now my default.
Could you specify how you managed this feat? I would like to have links
Lance Courtland wrote:
I will continue to use the Mail & Newsgroup functions, which I like a
lot. I have managed to make email links clicked in SM Email open in
Chrome, which is now my default.
Could you specify how you managed this feat? I would like to have links
open in the Firefox
It is with much sadness that I must abandon SeaMonkey as a web browser.
I have been a loyal user since Mosaic in 1993, then Netscape Navigator,
then SM. However, I have become overwhelmed by the quantity and
complexity of fixes, tweaks, configs, spoofs, and kluges, each
constantly needing
38 matches
Mail list logo
