Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/31/2010 8:09 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Just want to keep making the point not everyone desires tabs. And make
sure us people that don't, have the ability to customize the way we
want. I may be the only one on the groups that does, but there are most
likely unspoken
Ray_Net wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
»Q« wrote:
Innews:7rgdnrrlobixa_nwnz2dnuvz_j6dn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
If they want the silly tabs. Fine. If it makes people giddy using
them That's fine as well
Just please keep a way to turn the tab nonsense off. You
Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
Funny how things change. everyone now has to emulate Internet Explorer
to keep up. (Not necessarily the way it works under the hood.)
Well, one difference is that many people nowdays don't use any desktop
email client any more
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
I have tabs turned off for now. But everything opens in new windows
(which is better than tabs.) I'd like for it to re-use the current
window. I know on SM 1.1.18 there were certain sites that forced new
windows. but most would reuse the same window.
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...hmmnn...newsgrouping is my biggest reason for wanting an integrated
suite - best way to focus on information exchange with my hobbies.
I fully agree, and a number of other SeaMonkey users probably do as
well, I just wanted to explain why a large number
»Q« wrote:
Innews:eeidnfitt56q4vjwnz2dnuvz_gcdn...@mozilla.org,
Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Really? And early versions of Netscape were just simple browsers?
I still have both Mosaic and Netscape on disk, including a version
of the first Netscape w/support license. I
On 01/31/2010 08:09 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
»Q« wrote:
Innews:7rgdnrrlobixa_nwnz2dnuvz_j6dn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
If they want the silly tabs. Fine. If it makes people giddy using
them That's fine as well
Just please keep a way to turn the tab nonsense
Leonidas Jones wrote:
»Q« wrote:
Innews:eeidnfitt56q4vjwnz2dnuvz_gcdn...@mozilla.org,
Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Really? And early versions of Netscape were just simple browsers?
I still have both Mosaic and Netscape on disk, including a version
of the first Netscape
On or about 1/30/2010 1:03 AM, Lou typed the following:
Russell wrote:
As someone who's been on the web since the beginning with Mosaic , then
Netscape, then AOL Netscape (ugh) , then Netscape re-born as
Seamonkey, it's a
sad day to have to give up and move on,
The end comes with v2.x,
Russell schrieb:
I'm convinced that this was a ‘behind the doors' decision with the Firefox crowd
to justify Mozilla supporting a second browser project, and they then agreed
that Seamonkey would only continue as an integrated suite, and that's the only
way users will be able to use it (fatal
Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
BeeNeR wrote:
snip
Absolutely. That is just one of the reasons I've used Netscape,
Mozilla, and now SeaMonkey.
Yes. When did the integration take place? Netscape version 3.0 or so?
The first version I used was Netscape 3.0.a.Gold which I had to pay
$35.00 Buck
Russell wrote:
The end comes with v2.x, Seamonkey and the decision to no longer be a simple
browser, but that it must be an ‘all or nothing' suite. So if you need to use
another email client then it will just screw up your whole way of working.
I'm convinced that this was a ‘behind the doors'
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Russell schrieb:
I'm convinced that this was a ‘behind the doors' decision with the
Firefox crowd
to justify Mozilla supporting a second browser project, and they then
agreed
that Seamonkey would only continue as an integrated suite, and that's
the only
way users will be
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Russell schrieb:
I'm convinced that this was a ‘behind the doors' decision with the
Firefox crowd
to justify Mozilla supporting a second browser project, and they then
agreed
that Seamonkey would only continue as an integrated suite, and that's
the only
way
Rufus schrieb:
I don't know that I'd call it conspiracy, but in looking at Firefox,
Safari, Camino, Google Chrome, and now SM 2.x there certainly seems to
be a vast amount of code sharing/swapping going on...
Chrome and Safari share code with each other but don't share any code
with any of
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I don't know that I'd call it conspiracy, but in looking at Firefox,
Safari, Camino, Google Chrome, and now SM 2.x there certainly seems to
be a vast amount of code sharing/swapping going on...
Chrome and Safari share code with each other but don't share
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
I still find it
useful, but the two things I find most missing are never going to be
there because they are not in the base codes of FF and TB.
Unless someone comes up and writes code that implements them based on
the SM2 base - and everyone is welcome to that.
I am
Rufus schrieb:
The biggest one is opening Mail/News in a tab vice a second window of
it's own - that's integrated and really slick, especially on a laptop,
and in particular with Spaces in Mac OS X. Saves desk real estate in a
way I wouldn't have considered until I'd actually used it. Just
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
The biggest one is opening Mail/News in a tab vice a second window of
it's own - that's integrated and really slick, especially on a laptop,
and in particular with Spaces in Mac OS X. Saves desk real estate in a
way I wouldn't have considered until I'd
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I don't know that I'd call it conspiracy, but in looking at Firefox,
Safari, Camino, Google Chrome, and now SM 2.x there certainly seems to
be a vast amount of code sharing/swapping going on...
Chrome and Safari share code with each other but
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
The biggest one is opening Mail/News in a tab vice a second window of
it's own - that's integrated and really slick, especially on a laptop,
and in particular with Spaces in Mac OS X. Saves desk real estate in a
way I wouldn't have considered until I'd
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I don't know that I'd call it conspiracy, but in looking at Firefox,
Safari, Camino, Google Chrome, and now SM 2.x there certainly seems to
be a vast amount of code sharing/swapping going on...
Chrome and Safari share
Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
The biggest one is opening Mail/News in a tab vice a second window of
it's own - that's integrated and really slick, especially on a laptop,
and in particular with Spaces in Mac OS X. Saves desk real estate in a
way I wouldn't have
On 01/30/2010 03:34 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
The biggest one is opening Mail/News in a tab vice a second window of
it's own - that's integrated and really slick, especially on a laptop,
and in particular with Spaces in Mac OS X. Saves desk real estate in a
On 01/29/2010 03:36 PM, Russell wrote:
As someone who's been on the web since the beginning with Mosaic , then
Netscape, then AOL Netscape (ugh) , then Netscape re-born as Seamonkey, it's a
sad day to have to give up and move on,
The end comes with v2.x, Seamonkey and the decision to no
NoOp wrote:
On 01/30/2010 03:34 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
The biggest one is opening Mail/News in a tab vice a second window of
it's own - that's integrated and really slick, especially on a laptop,
and in particular with Spaces in Mac OS X. Saves desk real
Rufus wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/30/2010 03:34 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
The biggest one is opening Mail/News in a tab vice a second window of
it's own - that's integrated and really slick, especially on a laptop,
and in particular with Spaces in Mac OS X.
In news:7rgdnrrlobixa_nwnz2dnuvz_j6dn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jones pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
If they want the silly tabs. Fine. If it makes people giddy using
them That's fine as well
Just please keep a way to turn the tab nonsense off. You need to
satisfy all the users and not everyone is
As someone who's been on the web since the beginning with Mosaic , then
Netscape, then AOL Netscape (ugh) , then Netscape re-born as Seamonkey, it's a
sad day to have to give up and move on,
The end comes with v2.x, Seamonkey and the decision to no longer be a simple
browser, but that it must be
Russell wrote:
As someone who's been on the web since the beginning with Mosaic , then
Netscape, then AOL Netscape (ugh) , then Netscape re-born as Seamonkey, it's a
sad day to have to give up and move on,
The end comes with v2.x, Seamonkey and the decision to no longer be a simple
browser, but
201 - 230 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
