Re: Best version of Adobe Flash Player

2020-02-24 Thread David E. Ross
On 2/24/2020 9:17 PM, Danny Kile wrote: > What is the best version of Adobe Flash Player to run on Windows 7 Home > Premium and SeaMonkey 2.49.5? > > Thank you, > > Danny > Adobe's corporate blog indicates that Flash will no longer be maintained or distributed after the end of 2020. See

Re: Best version of Adobe Flash Player

2020-02-24 Thread Ant
On 2/24/2020 9:17 PM, Danny Kile wrote: What is the best version of Adobe Flash Player to run on Windows 7 Home Premium and SeaMonkey 2.49.5? Danny, the (lat/new)est version from https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/. Currently, it is at 32.0.0.330. FYI, Adobe usually release a new version

Re: best version

2009-05-21 Thread raf
Frank Booth Snr wrote: On 14 May, 21:10, Karl Anderson wordpr...@netscape.net wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: John Doue wrote: The best version is the one you have been using for a while to your satisfaction. Notif that version has publicly known exploits that have been patched in the next

Re: best version

2009-05-17 Thread Frank Booth Snr
On 14 May, 21:10, Karl Anderson wordpr...@netscape.net wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: John Doue wrote: The best version is the one you have been using for a while to your satisfaction. Notif that version has publicly known exploits that have been patched in the next version. The wise

Re: best version

2009-05-15 Thread Martin Feitag
John Doue schrieb: Karl Anderson wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: John Doue wrote: The best version is the one you have been using for a while to your satisfaction. Not if that version has publicly known exploits that have been patched in the next version. The wise man does not rush.

Re: best version

2009-05-15 Thread Daniel
John Doue wrote: Karl Anderson wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: John Doue wrote: The best version is the one you have been using for a while to your satisfaction. Not if that version has publicly known exploits that have been patched in the next version. The wise man does not rush.

Re: best version

2009-05-14 Thread Karl Anderson
Benoit Renard wrote: John Doue wrote: The best version is the one you have been using for a while to your satisfaction. Not if that version has publicly known exploits that have been patched in the next version. The wise man does not rush. Unfortunately, this isn't really true for

Re: best version

2009-05-14 Thread Mark Hansen
On 05/14/09 13:10, Karl Anderson wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: John Doue wrote: The best version is the one you have been using for a while to your satisfaction. Not if that version has publicly known exploits that have been patched in the next version. The wise man does not rush.

Re: best version

2009-05-14 Thread NoOp
On 05/14/2009 01:10 PM, Karl Anderson wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: John Doue wrote: The best version is the one you have been using for a while to your satisfaction. Not if that version has publicly known exploits that have been patched in the next version. The wise man does not

Re: best version

2009-05-14 Thread John Doue
Karl Anderson wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: John Doue wrote: The best version is the one you have been using for a while to your satisfaction. Not if that version has publicly known exploits that have been patched in the next version. The wise man does not rush. Unfortunately, this

Re: best version

2009-05-04 Thread Benoit Renard
John Doue wrote: The best version is the one you have been using for a while to your satisfaction. Not if that version has publicly known exploits that have been patched in the next version. The wise man does not rush. Unfortunately, this isn't really true for security updates, and often

Re: best version

2009-05-03 Thread Benoit Renard
Ray_Net wrote: Why not creating a version without vulnerabilities ... i'ts ennoying to always upgrade, upgrade, and upgrade ... You talk as if that's possible. :) Patches welcome. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: best version

2009-05-02 Thread Ray_Net
NoOp wrote: On 05/01/2009 06:38 AM, Benoit Renard wrote: NoOp wrote: For best web page rendering I'd recommend the pre-released 2.0 You shouldn't recommend an alpha version to an end user. All kinds of funky things might (and do) occur. Perhaps. But the link I provided does include a bright

Re: best version

2009-05-01 Thread Benoit Renard
NoOp wrote: For best web page rendering I'd recommend the pre-released 2.0 You shouldn't recommend an alpha version to an end user. All kinds of funky things might (and do) occur. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: best version

2009-04-30 Thread NoOp
On 04/30/2009 10:39 AM, Karl Anderson wrote: Is the current version of SeaMonkey compatable with older systems? My P3-900 with win2k has Mozilla 1.7.3 installed along with plugins for Flash, Shockwave, Adobe Reader, Realplayer, Quicktime and Flashblock, Mozilla Calendar 200502-cal, .