Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-08-14 Thread Jens Hatlak
Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 15, 10:21 am, Jens Hatlakj...@junetz.de wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: In SM 2.1.1pre if I select the Collected Addresses book, pick an address I can drag and drop the address into any other book. And it happens right away, and the book name

SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-26 Thread Charly Brown
1) While drawing a group of e-mail addresses from one address book into a second one without loosing them in the first address book (duplicating into another address book) doesn't work any longer since quiet a number of versions, now even the dragging of e-mail addresses e.g. from the collected

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-17 Thread Bill Davidsen
Jens Hatlak wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: The issue was caused by a change that Thunderbird developers made to shared code. (...) Thank you for clarifying, any hope that the Tbird team will accept what fixes are in SM, or are they incompatible. We need to fix it on our

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-15 Thread Charly Brown
On Jul 14, 3:45 pm, Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 11, 9:29 pm, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com  wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 2) Unfortunately imho the collect alladdresscollection function to get all addresses from to or cc

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-15 Thread Charly Brown
On Jul 15, 2:21 pm, Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 14, 3:45 pm, Danield...@albury.nospam.net.au  wrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 11, 9:29 pm, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com    wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 2) Unfortunately imho the

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-15 Thread Daniel
Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 15, 2:21 pm, Danield...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 14, 3:45 pm, Danield...@albury.nospam.net.auwrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 11, 9:29 pm, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 2)

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-15 Thread Charly Brown
On Jul 15, 4:26 pm, Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 15, 2:21 pm, Danield...@albury.nospam.net.au  wrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 14, 3:45 pm, Danield...@albury.nospam.net.au    wrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 11, 9:29 pm, Paul B. Gallagher

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-15 Thread Bill Davidsen
Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 15, 2:21 pm, Danield...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 14, 3:45 pm, Danield...@albury.nospam.net.auwrote: Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 11, 9:29 pm, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 2)

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-15 Thread Bill Davidsen
Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 15, 10:21 am, Jens Hatlakj...@junetz.de wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Sounds to me like there is an issue with 2.2. Yes, meanwhile added to the Known Issues section of the Release Notes: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.2/#issues The issue

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-15 Thread Bill Davidsen
Jens Hatlak wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: In SM 2.1.1pre if I select the Collected Addresses book, pick an address I can drag and drop the address into any other book. And it happens right away, and the book name highlights so I'm sure which book I'm dropping into, and

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-15 Thread Jens Hatlak
Bill Davidsen wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: The issue was caused by a change that Thunderbird developers made to shared code. (...) Thank you for clarifying, any hope that the Tbird team will accept what fixes are in SM, or are they incompatible. We need to fix it on our end; the change in

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-15 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Jens Hatlak wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: In SM 2.1.1pre if I select the Collected Addresses book, pick an address I can drag and drop the address into any other book. And it happens right away, and the book name highlights so I'm sure which book I'm dropping into, and

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-14 Thread Daniel
Charly Brown wrote: On Jul 11, 9:29 pm, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 2) Unfortunately imho the collect alladdresscollection function to get all addresses from to or cc sentaddresslists in received e-mails is not given any more since the days

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-14 Thread Bill Davidsen
Charly Brown wrote: 1) While drawing a group of e-mail addresses from one address book into a second one without loosing them in the first address book (duplicating into another address book) doesn't work any longer since quiet a number of versions, now even the dragging of e-mail addresses e.g.

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-14 Thread Bill Davidsen
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 2) Unfortunately imho the collect all address collection function to get all addresses from to or cc sent address lists in received e-mails is not given any more since the days mozilla evolved from netscape. Or have I overlooked something? How can I

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-14 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Bill Davidsen wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 2) Unfortunately imho the collect all address collection function to get all addresses from to or cc sent address lists in received e-mails is not given any more since the days mozilla evolved from netscape. Or have I

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-14 Thread Bill Davidsen
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 2) Unfortunately imho the collect all address collection function to get all addresses from to or cc sent address lists in received e-mails is not given any more since the days mozilla evolved from

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-14 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Bill Davidsen wrote: In SM 2.1.1pre if I select the Collected Addresses book, pick an address I can drag and drop the address into any other book. And it happens right away, and the book name highlights so I'm sure which book I'm dropping into, and the record is in the new book without

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-11 Thread Bill Spikowski
Charly Brown wrote: 1) While drawing a group of e-mail addresses from one address book into a second one without loosing them in the first address book (duplicating into another address book) doesn't work any longer since quiet a number of versions, now even the dragging of e-mail addresses e.g.

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-11 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Charly Brown wrote: 2) Unfortunately imho the collect all address collection function to get all addresses from to or cc sent address lists in received e-mails is not given any more since the days mozilla evolved from netscape. Or have I overlooked something? How can I quickly (one click)

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-11 Thread Charly Brown
On Jul 11, 8:20 pm, Bill Spikowski b...@spikowski.com wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 1) While drawing a group of e-mail addresses from oneaddressbook into a second one without loosing them in the firstaddressbook (duplicating into anotheraddressbook) doesn't work any longer since quiet a

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-11 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Bill Spikowski wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 1) While drawing a group of e-mail addresses from one address book into a second one without loosing them in the first address book (duplicating into another address book) doesn't work any longer since quiet a number of versions, now even the dragging

Re: SEAMONKEY ADDRESS BOOK REALLY POOR NOW

2011-07-11 Thread Bill Spikowski
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: Charly Brown wrote: 1) While drawing a group of e-mail addresses from one address book into a second one without loosing them in the first address book (duplicating into another address book) doesn't work any longer since quiet a number of