On 7/29/2018 1:34 PM, FredW wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:20:41 -0700, Ant wrote:
On 7/29/2018 5:38 AM, FredW wrote:
...
I do not have a solution for you.
But I use the mail notifier PopTrayU 5.2.6 to check incoming mail.
http://poptrayu.sourceforge.net/category/releases/
PopTrayU notifies m
On 7/29/2018 5:38 AM, FredW wrote:
...
I do not have a solution for you.
But I use the mail notifier PopTrayU 5.2.6 to check incoming mail.
http://poptrayu.sourceforge.net/category/releases/
PopTrayU notifies me when there are new emails on the server of my
provider(s) and allows to have a look
On 07/29/2018 07:38 AM, FredW wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 14:00:38 +0200, Dirk Munk wrote:
At the moment I'm receiving 10, 20 spam message per day. They all have
in common that all contents is remote, the message itself is empty. To
see the message I have to use the option to download the conte
At the moment I'm receiving 10, 20 spam message per day. They all have
in common that all contents is remote, the message itself is empty. To
see the message I have to use the option to download the contents.
Setting up filters is very difficult, the messages come from all kind of
stupid sende
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Thanks for all the good advice. In this case there was no problem
recognizing the messages as spam, with subject of "Re:" and only a
shortened link in the body. My main concern was determining whether the
friend's computer had malware vs. the from address being spoofed. T
Cecil Bankston wrote:
> Thanks for all the good advice. In this case there was no problem
> recognizing the messages as spam, with subject of "Re:" and only a
> shortened link in the body. My main concern was determining whether the
> friend's computer had malware vs. the from address being spoo
Thanks for all the good advice. In this case there was no problem
recognizing the messages as spam, with subject of "Re:" and only a
shortened link in the body. My main concern was determining whether the
friend's computer had malware vs. the from address being spoofed. The
friend is in TN,
Cecil Bankston wrote:
I am receiving spam or scam messages, consisting of only a shortened
link, from the e-mail address of a friend. If the messages actually
originate in the friend's computer, should they always be found in the
friend's sent folder? If the from address is being spoofed, is th
Cecil Bankston wrote:
I am receiving spam or scam messages, consisting of only a shortened link, from
the e-mail
address of a friend. If the messages actually originate in the friend's
computer, should
they always be found in the friend's sent folder?
No. How do you know what program is bei
Richard Alan wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Richard Alan wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
I am receiving spam or scam messages, consisting of only a shortened
link, from the e-mail address of a friend. If the messages actually
originate in the friend's computer, should they always be found in
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Richard Alan wrote:
>> Cecil Bankston wrote:
>>
>>> I am receiving spam or scam messages, consisting of only a shortened
>>> link, from the e-mail address of a friend. If the messages actually
>>> originate in the friend's computer, should they always be found in the
>>
Richard Alan wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
I am receiving spam or scam messages, consisting of only a shortened
link, from the e-mail address of a friend. If the messages actually
originate in the friend's computer, should they always be found in the
friend's sent folder? If the from address
Cecil Bankston wrote:
> I am receiving spam or scam messages, consisting of only a shortened
> link, from the e-mail address of a friend. If the messages actually
> originate in the friend's computer, should they always be found in the
> friend's sent folder? If the from address is being spoofed
I am receiving spam or scam messages, consisting of only a shortened
link, from the e-mail address of a friend. If the messages actually
originate in the friend's computer, should they always be found in the
friend's sent folder? If the from address is being spoofed, is there an
easy way to d
sean nathan bean wrote:
> really don't think that'd be the case... not that i get a lot of
> spam hese days... i just find it interesting that i get duplicates
> of 100% of what spam arrives...
>
> seems like a hiccup in servers to me...
Easy to prove if they are duplicates or not. Look at the h
Paul sent me the following::
sean nathan bean wrote:
sean nathan bean sent me the following::
i am once again using my @netscape.net e'mail as my primary e'mail in
Seamonkey 2.2...
wondering if anyone has an explanation as to why the aol servers send me
two copies of all the spam... anyone els
sean nathan bean wrote:
sean nathan bean sent me the following::
i am once again using my @netscape.net e'mail as my primary e'mail in
Seamonkey 2.2...
wondering if anyone has an explanation as to why the aol servers send me
two copies of all the spam... anyone else seeing this via the @aim @ao
sean nathan bean sent me the following::
i am once again using my @netscape.net e'mail as my primary e'mail in
Seamonkey 2.2...
wondering if anyone has an explanation as to why the aol servers send me
two copies of all the spam... anyone else seeing this via the @aim @aol
@netscape servers?
sea
sean nathan bean a écrit :
wondering if anyone has an explanation as to why the aol servers send me
two copies of all the spam... anyone else seeing this via the @aim @aol
@netscape servers?
No problem on my end with my @netscape addy.
S.
___
suppo
i am once again using my @netscape.net e'mail as my primary e'mail in
Seamonkey 2.2...
wondering if anyone has an explanation as to why the aol servers send me
two copies of all the spam... anyone else seeing this via the @aim @aol
@netscape servers?
sean
--
All bleeding eventually stops.
20 matches
Mail list logo
