Re: SM and FF slow!
Cedar wrote: My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE, however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening? Running SM in safe mode seems to speed things up somewhat, but still pretty slow. Also, in safe mode, I noticed that when I clicked stop on one site that had been loading and tried to go to another site, SM kept on trying to load the images from the first site! I had to hit stop and enter the next url several times before it went to the next site. I installed prefbar a couple of days agonaw...it couldn't be causing these problems, could it? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM and FF slow!
Cedar wrote: Cedar wrote: My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE, however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening? Running SM in safe mode seems to speed things up somewhat, but still pretty slow. Also, in safe mode, I noticed that when I clicked stop on one site that had been loading and tried to go to another site, SM kept on trying to load the images from the first site! I had to hit stop and enter the next url several times before it went to the next site. I installed prefbar a couple of days agonaw...it couldn't be causing these problems, could it? As well, the net connection keeps stalling (this does not seem to happen in ie), and the Networking tab in Windows Task Manager shows a very low percentage of Network Utilization. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM and FF slow!
Cedar schrieb: Cedar wrote: My SM 2.0 and FF 3.0.10 are extremely slowno matter what I'm trying to do. Like 10 to 20 minutes (dialup) to open a webpage! IE, however, gets there lickety-split! Any ideas what might be happening? Running SM in safe mode seems to speed things up somewhat, but still pretty slow. Also, in safe mode, I noticed that when I clicked stop on one site that had been loading and tried to go to another site, SM kept on trying to load the images from the first site! I had to hit stop and enter the next url several times before it went to the next site. I installed prefbar a couple of days agonaw...it couldn't be causing these problems, could it? Very unlikely prefbar shouldn't interact with those kind of hings usually. regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Browser Doesn't email does not show Images
Brooke Clarke schrieb: Hi: I don't use the browser, but while trying to figure out the problem with email not showing images have discovered that the browser does not show anything. How to get the email program to display images (.gif .jpeg) ? Normally under View there's an option to show inline attachments (this is mainly important for text mails). If the images are not part of the message but being loaded from the internet (often the case with HTML email newsletters etc.), you need to disable the option to block external images in the preferences under Mail Newsgroups, message view (freely translated by me, actual names may vary ;-)) But I suspect there's something else wrong if the browser fails to display anything. Have you tried to verify this behaviour with a new profile? regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 mailnews Password issues
NoOp wrote: I'm not sure how to test further. Make an SMTP log? http://kb.mozillazine.org/Session_logging_for_mail/news -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 mailnews Password issues
NoOp ha scritto: Ran into an interesting problem today; ATT (my isp) had issues with their email server today. I opened up SM 2.0 (linux) and found that all but one account (this one) were working. I couldn't send msgs, couldn't receive msgs etc. I couldn not even log on to the ATT webmail. [CUT] So it appears that there is something in the 2.0 password routine that gets stuck when it gets a refused password or error from the isp side. I'm not sure how to test further. Hi, same problem here and I have my own mail server (EIMS 3.3.9). Today I typed a wrong pw, SM 2.0 showed an alert to enter a new pw / retry / cancel. Well, I did type the correct pw, but still the wrong one was sent to my mail server (I saw it in the log). Then I clicked on retry and the good one was sent. Gabriele ps: I'm setting f/u to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey only. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
On or about 11/30/2009 12:08 AM, Leonidas Jones typed the following: S N I P SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 *Firefox/2.0.0.7* *Emphasis mine.* S N I P Neither 'Firefox/2.0.0.7' nor 'Emphasis mine.' shows in *bold*. Why? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: A bug in SMTP dialog box/prompt?
On 30.11.2009 00:38, Ant wrote: --- Original Message --- Hi. http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/4025/screenshotph.gif from SeaMonkey v2.0 in my updated Windows XP Pro. SP3. I noticed I could highlight the texts. I accidently clicked on it, typed my password (not shown -- whew), and hit enter. I was wondering why it didn't work. Thank you in advance. :) What texts?? If you're speaking of the error message text, it's a graphic, not a text as such. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion www.ufaq.org Netscape - Flock - Firefox - Thunderbird - Seamonkey Support ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Phillip Jones wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Bush wrote: Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey 2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA Time for me to go back to 1.1.18 The best attitude you can do is to avoid trying to use a new version/design ... too earlier. Problem is they drop support and updates on 1.1.8 as soon as 2 went gold. The problem is created by optimist guys putting the Gold status too early ... Reading the newsgroup convince me that the status should return to beta version. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Phillip Jones wrote: Problem is they drop support and updates on 1.1.8 as soon as 2 went gold. so if there are any security problems, it won't be updated. Please spell the version number correctly. It's 1.1.18, the 18th security and stability update. SeaMonkey 1.1.x hasn't been pronounced dead yet. Sometime in December it will be looked at, and a decision will be made. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Bush wrote: I'll try again after version 2.5 is released This is SeaMonkey, not Firefox. We don't do silly .5 version number jumps. ;) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: A bug in SMTP dialog box/prompt?
On 11/30/2009 12:57 AM PT, Martin Freitag typed: http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/4025/screenshotph.gif from SeaMonkey v2.0 in my updated Windows XP Pro. SP3. I noticed I could highlight the texts. I accidently clicked on it, typed my password (not shown -- whew), and hit enter. I was wondering why it didn't work. I guess because the focus for the cursor was at the marked text and not in the textbox, just click in th textbox again and you should be able to type your PW. regards I know that, but why did the prompt allow me to highlight that text? That shouldn't happen and sounds like a bug. -- In a battle between elephants, the ants get squashed. --Thailand /\___/\ / /\ /\ \ Phil/Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) | |o o| |Ant's Quality Foraged Links (AQFL): http://aqfl.net \ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address: phi...@earthlink.netant ( ) or ant...@zimage.com Ant is currently not listening to any songs on his home computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
On 30.11.2009 08:35, Benoit Renard wrote: --- Original Message --- John Boyle wrote: My evaluation of 2.0 is that it is somewhat faster as a browser, but, as with all the others, the email and newsgroups stink, still! I did NOT want to even download it, but was persuaded by a couple of people, however, nobody seems to want to tackle the FACT that version 2.0 IS TERRIBLY DEFICIENT IN THE EMAIL AND NEWSGROUPS DEPARTMENTS, as people have been saying, CONSTANTLY, and the developers JUST SIMPLY REFUSE TO LISTEN TO ANY CRITICISM, EVEN IF BASED ON FACT! Please don't confuse Robert Kaiser, the most prominent developer, with the developers. I'm a developer, even if I don't contribute all that often, and I will tell you this: SeaMonkey 2.0's mailnews part is based on a beta version of Thunderbird 3.0. When Thunderbird 3.0 is done, the next release of SeaMonkey 2.0 will incorporate all the fixes, and hopefully be more reliable in that department. Why is a release based on a beta ? -- Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion www.ufaq.org Netscape - Flock - Firefox - Thunderbird - Seamonkey Support ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
u...@domain.invalid: Neither 'Firefox/2.0.0.7' nor 'Emphasis mine.' shows in *bold*. Why? In the first case it is due to the number 7 and in the second case it is due to the point. Try a few examples. Such with letters on both ends will be displayed in bold. AFAIR a very old bug. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Jay Garcia wrote: On 30.11.2009 08:35, Benoit Renard wrote: --- Original Message --- John Boyle wrote: My evaluation of 2.0 is that it is somewhat faster as a browser, but, as with all the others, the email and newsgroups stink, still! I did NOT want to even download it, but was persuaded by a couple of people, however, nobody seems to want to tackle the FACT that version 2.0 IS TERRIBLY DEFICIENT IN THE EMAIL AND NEWSGROUPS DEPARTMENTS, as people have been saying, CONSTANTLY, and the developers JUST SIMPLY REFUSE TO LISTEN TO ANY CRITICISM, EVEN IF BASED ON FACT! Please don't confuse Robert Kaiser, the most prominent developer, with the developers. I'm a developer, even if I don't contribute all that often, and I will tell you this: SeaMonkey 2.0's mailnews part is based on a beta version of Thunderbird 3.0. When Thunderbird 3.0 is done, the next release of SeaMonkey 2.0 will incorporate all the fixes, and hopefully be more reliable in that department. Why is a release based on a beta ? Yeah - seems like a bad decision on somebody's part... -JW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
On or about 11/30/2009 9:57 AM, Hartmut Figge typed the following: u...@domain.invalid: Neither 'Firefox/2.0.0.7' nor 'Emphasis mine.' shows in *bold*. Why? In the first case it is due to the number 7 and in the second case it is due to the point. Try a few examples. Such with letters on both ends will be displayed in bold. AFAIR a very old bug. Hartmut Thanks Hartmut, for the explanation. Never came across that before. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
On 30.11.2009 08:58, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 30.11.2009 08:35, Benoit Renard wrote: --- Original Message --- John Boyle wrote: My evaluation of 2.0 is that it is somewhat faster as a browser, but, as with all the others, the email and newsgroups stink, still! I did NOT want to even download it, but was persuaded by a couple of people, however, nobody seems to want to tackle the FACT that version 2.0 IS TERRIBLY DEFICIENT IN THE EMAIL AND NEWSGROUPS DEPARTMENTS, as people have been saying, CONSTANTLY, and the developers JUST SIMPLY REFUSE TO LISTEN TO ANY CRITICISM, EVEN IF BASED ON FACT! Please don't confuse Robert Kaiser, the most prominent developer, with the developers. I'm a developer, even if I don't contribute all that often, and I will tell you this: SeaMonkey 2.0's mailnews part is based on a beta version of Thunderbird 3.0. When Thunderbird 3.0 is done, the next release of SeaMonkey 2.0 will incorporate all the fixes, and hopefully be more reliable in that department. Why is a release based on a beta ? Yeah - seems like a bad decision on somebody's part... -JW Well, I realize it was an incomplete question as ALL releases are based on betas but I think the meaning was transmitted - why is a SM release based on a TB beta where there are as yet unresolved bugs? -- Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion www.ufaq.org Netscape - Flock - Firefox - Thunderbird - Seamonkey Support ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
On 11/29/2009 10:07 PM, Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote: Bush wrote: /snip/ On the SeaMonkey 1.1.18 menu bar, select [Help About SeaMonkey]. Under the large-type link for SeaMonkey 1.1.18 at the top of the page, do you see the following: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 If you see anything different, please copy the entire string and paste it into a reply to this message. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Okay, you spoofed your 1.1.18 profile to Firefox. That is the sole reason it works for you in 1.1.18 and not 2.0. Spoof 2.0 as Firefox, and it works too, as I have found. Your fix is ludicrous. You are letting your anger get the better of you. Lets take a deep breathe here. Lee I spoofed Nothing ... What is Spoof ? I had seamonket 1.1.18 and uninstalled it then I installed 2.0 Found it was a piece of Crap. So I uninstalled it And now I installed 1.1.18 again . Copied over the files I saved to DVD's prior to installing 2.0. I am Not Angry ... I love trying to Get a piece of Crap up and Running... But 2.0 is out of my Class . So how does one Get rid of this So called SPOOF ? Deep breath myself. Look at the User Agent string you posted in response to David's request. Its above, but here it is again: SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 *Firefox/2.0.0.7* *Emphasis mine.* You have your 1.1.18 profile reporting that it is Firefox 2.0.07 on Windows XP, instead of SeaMonkey 1.1.18 on Windows XP. The site's browser sniffer lets you in because it thinks you are using ff 2.0.0.7. That's called UA spoofing. The User Agent string is what is reported to the web site's server as the browser and OS you are using. At some time, you changed the User Agent string in SeaMonkey 1.1.18 to spoof FF 2.0.0.7, probably to fix a similar problem with another web site. You may not remember doing it, but clearly you did it at some time. This can be done manually in about:config, or by an extension, such as teh UA switcher. I don't know how you did it. Installing 2.0 caused SeaMonkey to report as what it actually is, SeaMonkey 2.0. If I spoof the 2.0 UA to report as FF 3.5, it works fine too. To tell users that going back to Sm 1.1.18 to *fix* this problem is totally incorrect. SM 1.1.18 with its proper user agent has exactly the same problem as SM 2.0. I understand your frustration over the Sm 2.0 upgrade. Still, it is unwise to simply post blanket *fixes* as you have done tonight. Its not always correct, indeed often wrong, and its not helpsing users to solve 2.0 problems. Lee Too bad I am Using Windows 7 professional... Now How did that error Happen ? As stated before . I know nothing about Spoofing... Its just that the method Both of you think is Accurate , IS in NO WAY accurate . Windows 7 Pro and Seamonkey 1.1.18 No Xp on my hard drive , I did a NEW INSTALL ( No Upgrade) of win 7 . and here is your So called spoofing results again SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Good Grief! The only way your SeaMonkey 1.1.X will report that user agent value is if YOU put it in there at some point. The fact that you don't remember doing it doesn't change that fact. The spoofing goes in the Profile. The profile is not shared between SeaMonkey 1.1.X and SeaMonkey 2.X, so the spoofing done in 1.1.X would not have been copied to 2.0 (unless, again, you copied it). As a result, the fact that your installation of SeaMonkey 2.0 is not spoofing itself as FireFox is not a surprise. ps... When I had Xp and Seamonkey 1.1.18 I was able to get into the Blm Website . and prior to win7 installation I NEVER installed The Firefox standalones on this computer . Installing Firefox has nothing to do with having SeaMonkey spoof itself as firefox. Do you still not understand what spoofing is? It was explained to you in a previous post. I first went to Blm site Way back in 2002 when I started Research on my Family History . I found my Grandfathers Homesteader property via that site and even printed out a copy of the Deed , So I guess I SPOOFED seamonkey to read as seamonkey 2.0 . SEVEN years before seamonkey 2.0 was released . Where do you see that? According to your User Agent string above, you spoofed SeaMonkey 1.1.X to report itself as Firefox 2.0.07, not SeaMonkey 2.0. You don't seem to want any help, but rather just want to sling mud at other SeaMonkey users. What's the point in that? Whom do you believe you are helping? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list
New Profile Solved Problem, Now What?
Hi: The browser did not work at all and was not seeing images in email. After creating a new profile the browser now works and the images show up in email. How to migrate my old messages to the new profile? Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Jay Garcia wrote: On 30.11.2009 08:58, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 30.11.2009 08:35, Benoit Renard wrote: --- Original Message --- John Boyle wrote: My evaluation of 2.0 is that it is somewhat faster as a browser, but, as with all the others, the email and newsgroups stink, still! I did NOT want to even download it, but was persuaded by a couple of people, however, nobody seems to want to tackle the FACT that version 2.0 IS TERRIBLY DEFICIENT IN THE EMAIL AND NEWSGROUPS DEPARTMENTS, as people have been saying, CONSTANTLY, and the developers JUST SIMPLY REFUSE TO LISTEN TO ANY CRITICISM, EVEN IF BASED ON FACT! Please don't confuse Robert Kaiser, the most prominent developer, with the developers. I'm a developer, even if I don't contribute all that often, and I will tell you this: SeaMonkey 2.0's mailnews part is based on a beta version of Thunderbird 3.0. When Thunderbird 3.0 is done, the next release of SeaMonkey 2.0 will incorporate all the fixes, and hopefully be more reliable in that department. Why is a release based on a beta ? Yeah - seems like a bad decision on somebody's part... -JW Well, I realize it was an incomplete question as ALL releases are based on betas but I think the meaning was transmitted - why is a SM release based on a TB beta where there are as yet unresolved bugs? There is not too much or no Gecko mailnews bugs, which SM and TB sharing. TB is beta because of it's UI bugs or parts of mailnews that SM not uses, so it's pretty safe to go gold. It's a good decision, some open source software take years in beta or even alpha, which doesn't prevent them to be as stable as releases. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Fedex Page does not load
Hi: When trying to track a fedex shipment at: http://www.fedex.com/us/ a text only menu loads, and at the bottom of the window appears: Read images.fedex.com, the icon in the upper right shows motion but the page does not load. How to fix that? Have Fun, Brooke Clarke ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
On 11/29/2009 8:46 PM, Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote: Bush wrote: A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ Here is the fix #1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA #2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18 And the site is Viewable But wait for seamonket 2.5 to be released and try again . I get the problem with SeaMonkey 1.1.18. On the SeaMonkey 1.1.18 menu bar, select [Help About SeaMonkey]. Under the large-type link for SeaMonkey 1.1.18 at the top of the page, do you see the following: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 If you see anything different, please copy the entire string and paste it into a reply to this message. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Okay, you spoofed your 1.1.18 profile to Firefox. That is the sole reason it works for you in 1.1.18 and not 2.0. Spoof 2.0 as Firefox, and it works too, as I have found. Your fix is ludicrous. You are letting your anger get the better of you. Lets take a deep breathe here. Lee I spoofed Nothing ... What is Spoof ? I had seamonket 1.1.18 and uninstalled it then I installed 2.0 Found it was a piece of Crap. So I uninstalled it And now I installed 1.1.18 again . Copied over the files I saved to DVD's prior to installing 2.0. I am Not Angry ... I love trying to Get a piece of Crap up and Running... But 2.0 is out of my Class . So how does one Get rid of this So called SPOOF ? Spoofing is how a user counteracts sniffing. For an explanation of sniffing, see my http://www.rossde.com/internet/Webdevelopers.html#sniff. For an explanation of spoofing, see my http://www.rossde.com/internet/intr_gloss.html#spoof. To summarize, you told http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ that you were using Firefox 2.0.0.7 when you were actually using SeaMonkey 1.1.18. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
On 11/29/2009 10:07 PM, Bush wrote: Too bad I am Using Windows 7 professional... Now How did that error Happen ? As stated before . I know nothing about Spoofing... Its just that the method Both of you think is Accurate , IS in NO WAY accurate . Windows 7 Pro and Seamonkey 1.1.18 No Xp on my hard drive , I did a NEW INSTALL ( No Upgrade) of win 7 . and here is your So called spoofing results again SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 It's not an error. You had to have set a preference to say that you are using Firefox 2.0.0.7 on Windows XP (which is the meaning of Windows NT 5.1). ps... When I had Xp and Seamonkey 1.1.18 I was able to get into the Blm Website . and prior to win7 installation I NEVER installed The Firefox standalones on this computer . I first went to Blm site Way back in 2002 when I started Research on my Family History . I found my Grandfathers Homesteader property via that site and even printed out a copy of the Deed , So I guess I SPOOFED seamonkey to read as seamonkey 2.0 . SEVEN years before seamonkey 2.0 was released . Way back in 2002, the site had to be different. They upgraded (??) the site sometime in the past 7 years. You never noticed because, when that happened, you were already telling Web servers that you were using Firefox. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Fedex Page does not load
On 11/30/2009 7:50 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi: When trying to track a fedex shipment at: http://www.fedex.com/us/ a text only menu loads, and at the bottom of the window appears: Read images.fedex.com, the icon in the upper right shows motion but the page does not load. How to fix that? Have Fun, Brooke Clarke It's working for me. Clear your cache and try again. To clear your cache, go to the menu bar and select [Edit Preferences]. On the Preferences window, select [Advanced Cache]. On the Cache pane, select the Clear Cache button and then the OK button. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Fedex Page does not load
Hi David: Clearning the cache did not make any difference. Note that I just make a new profile, which allowed the browser to work. I can see images on other web pages, but not on the Fedex page. Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Fedex Page does not load
Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi David: Clearning the cache did not make any difference. Note that I just make a new profile, which allowed the browser to work. I can see images on other web pages, but not on the Fedex page. Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com go back to original and see if View Message Body As Original HTML is set. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2 problems
scott wrote: second... I get spam... I use the spam filter... but it only lets me subjegate one spam out. then seamonk opens the next email duh spamhope you understand , seamonk should not jump into the email until I have finished killing spam.. I think the previous version did not have this problem I can recieve over 30 emails when I sign on... I know very well my accept list of people.. anything else I junk period... this malfunction in seamonkey stress's me Unselect Message (available at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#unselectmessage) solves that problem. I've been using it both in 1.1.x and 2.0 without a problem. You need xSidebar to install it, though. S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Problem is they drop support and updates on 1.1.8 as soon as 2 went gold. so if there are any security problems, it won't be updated. Please spell the version number correctly. It's 1.1.18, the 18th security and stability update. SeaMonkey 1.1.x hasn't been pronounced dead yet. Sometime in December it will be looked at, and a decision will be made. Your Right it is 1.1.18. It may not be as of yet, but no new activity is being done to it. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Benoit Renard wrote: John Boyle wrote: My evaluation of 2.0 is that it is somewhat faster as a browser, but, as with all the others, the email and newsgroups stink, still! I did NOT want to even download it, but was persuaded by a couple of people, however, nobody seems to want to tackle the FACT that version 2.0 IS TERRIBLY DEFICIENT IN THE EMAIL AND NEWSGROUPS DEPARTMENTS, as people have been saying, CONSTANTLY, and the developers JUST SIMPLY REFUSE TO LISTEN TO ANY CRITICISM, EVEN IF BASED ON FACT! Please don't confuse Robert Kaiser, the most prominent developer, with the developers. I'm a developer, even if I don't contribute all that often, and I will tell you this: SeaMonkey 2.0's mailnews part is based on a beta version of Thunderbird 3.0. When Thunderbird 3.0 is done, the next release of SeaMonkey 2.0 will incorporate all the fixes, and hopefully be more reliable in that department. To Mr. Renard: Well, I look forward to seeing the change in those 2 Parts, then! I am glad to see that someone DOES listen, after all! I hope you have taken what 1.1.18 has and just improved, if possible, on it by removing what ever problems it has, as re-inventing the wheel when it is NOT needed, only breaks the continuity of the product! :-\ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Fedex Page does not load
Brooke Clarke wrote: Hi: When trying to track a fedex shipment at: http://www.fedex.com/us/ a text only menu loads, and at the bottom of the window appears: Read images.fedex.com, the icon in the upper right shows motion but the page does not load. How to fix that? Have Fun, Brooke Clarke Welcome to cyber Monday. I notice a few other sites are behaving like they're really, really busy. Just a guess on my part. -- JD.. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
MSOHEV.DLL keeps breaking my Seamonkey icons
I have been a loyal user of Netscape-descended products since about 1995. I went through the whole old Netscape family from 1 to 4.x, then moved to Mozilla Application Suite when it went 1.0 and eventually to Seamonkey, also when it went 1.0 -- and now I moved to Seamonkey 2. (By the way, I think I should point out that I never had any significant problems with any of them -- the opposite in fact, since the few problems I had were *easily* solved, while similar problems with IE or Outlook Express in my customers' machines turned out to be major headaches.) However, for a number of reasons, for a long time I kept Internet Exploder as the official default browser in my Windows setup -- mainly because it used to load faster when I clicked on a local HTML file, and also because a few IE-dependent applications had problems if you changed default browser. I almost never used IE for actual Internet browsing, much less OE or even Outlook for e-mail. Then IE7 (and later IE8) came, and Microsoft finally took steps to separate the browser from the operating system -- a small step in the right direction from a security standpoint. But the end result is that IE now loads quite slower, negating the advantage of leaving it as the default HTML file viewer. Also, with the rise of Firefox, other applications learned how to deal with a computer where IE is not the default browser. So, with a song in my heart, I thought I was finally able to set Seamonkey as the default browser. Or so I thought. Turns out that there is a Microsoft piece of crap that insists on ruining it: the so-called Office HTML Icon Handler (MSOHEV.DLL). It is installed (no choice about it) with Office 2003, and modifies the standard way Explorer handles HTML files: if it finds a line in the HTML header indicating that an Office application generated that file, it does two things: 1. If you right-click the file and choose Edit, it will open the file on the so-called appropriate application (usually Word, but sometimes Excel or PowerPoint) instead of on the default HTML editor (Notetab, a plaintext editor, in my case). 2. It will change the icon and filetype description in Explorer to indicate the file special status as an office HTML file. Having a different icon is (sometimes) convenient, because it makes it plain that that file will need hand-tweaking (Word-generated HTML is so full of crap that after I finish with it, the file has usually shrunk by two-thirds or more). But it makes browsing a directory with lots of HTML files very slow, since the handler will have to open each file to check. But I could live with the lowered performance, so I let it be. Until, that is, when it *broke*. Now all my HTML files display the unknown file type icon (although they are listed correctly as Seamonkey Document). I tried all sorts of remedies. I tried unregistering the DLL, as detailed here: http://richardrudek.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!8B65F3DE0BE797AA!219.entry I tried deleting the Iconhandler subkey on the Seamonkey HTML Registry key. I tried setting the default browser back to IE and then to Seamonkey again. I tried uninstalling and reinstalling Office. I tried manually choosing the correct icon. All solutions I found were transitory at best. As soon as I use Word it will restore the defaults and crap all over my setup again. Has anybody managed to tame this beast? -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... More things change, the more you need alterations * TagZilla 0.0661 * http://tagzilla.mozdev.org on Seamonkey 2.0 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Ray_Net wrote: The problem is created by optimist guys putting the Gold status too early The KDE team had a similar problem with KDE 4.0. To get anyone to write apps for the updated codebase, they had to remove the Beta status. They, however, noted that 4.0 was a *This will eat your children* release (though Fedora ignored that and shipped it anyway.) With 4.1, the KDE team again stated *This will STILL eat your children*. The problems stem from an inadequate numbering system; the Linux kernel has a solution to this (odd/even). Now that there has been enough feedback to weed out the problems, KDE 4.2 and KDE 4.3 are getting glowing reviews. If more folks would use and give feedback on the _pre-release_ versions of SeaMonkey, perhaps the point-zero release wouldn't be so traumatic. As it is, apparently eveyone waits till the formal release then gets their knickers in a knot and can't wait to bitch. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: unable to send mail
chicagofan wrote: u...@domain.invalid wrote: I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops up an box saying: Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server mail.bellsouth.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Use name and password' for that server or contact your service provider. I don't have the authenticate box checked. Anyone know whats going on? Under your user account's Mail/Newsgroup Menu, have you checked your settings under Outgoing Server [SMTP]? If not, click EDIT from your toolbar/Click Mail Newsgroups Account Settings/ Click Outgoing Server (SMTP)/then CLICK... EDIT on the default settings for your server. Make sure the box is NOT checked to authenticate... in that pop up box. I apologize if you have already done this, but there is more than one authenticate box in SM, and this is what happened to me, when I upgraded to 2.0. That box had been checked to authenticate, although it wasn't needed by my ISP [or in my previous settings]. When I changed this, my problems went away. HTH someone. bj thanks chicagofan. the authenticate box wasn't checked but the one saying use name and password was and when I unchecked that I was able to send. thanks Charles ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
David E. Ross wrote: On 11/29/2009 10:07 PM, Bush wrote: Too bad I am Using Windows 7 professional... Now How did that error Happen ? As stated before . I know nothing about Spoofing... Its just that the method Both of you think is Accurate , IS in NO WAY accurate . Windows 7 Pro and Seamonkey 1.1.18 No Xp on my hard drive , I did a NEW INSTALL ( No Upgrade) of win 7 . and here is your So called spoofing results again SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 It's not an error. You had to have set a preference to say that you are using Firefox 2.0.0.7 on Windows XP (which is the meaning of Windows NT 5.1). ps... When I had Xp and Seamonkey 1.1.18 I was able to get into the Blm Website . and prior to win7 installation I NEVER installed The Firefox standalones on this computer . I first went to Blm site Way back in 2002 when I started Research on my Family History . I found my Grandfathers Homesteader property via that site and even printed out a copy of the Deed , So I guess I SPOOFED seamonkey to read as seamonkey 2.0 . SEVEN years before seamonkey 2.0 was released . Way back in 2002, the site had to be different. They upgraded (??) the site sometime in the past 7 years. You never noticed because, when that happened, you were already telling Web servers that you were using Firefox. Does not make any Sence that I could So Called SPOOF an earlier Version Way before the newer Version Was even Thought of .. What about Win 7 and Win xp thing ? I will have to Check and see if win7 is running ver 1.1.18 in Compatibility Mode . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
any way to collapse news servers......
so they don't show all the groups? I have 3 servers, this morning one was collapsed the other 2 were not. This afternoon they were all expanded, no big deal, I can get used to closing than opening the servers to get message counts. TIA ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: unable to send mail
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:28:17 -0500, chicagofan m...@privacy.net in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: u...@domain.invalid wrote: I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops up an box saying: Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server mail.bellsouth.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Use name and password' for that server or contact your service provider. I don't have the authenticate box checked. Anyone know whats going on? Under your user account's Mail/Newsgroup Menu, have you checked your settings under Outgoing Server [SMTP]? If not, click EDIT from your toolbar/Click Mail Newsgroups Account Settings/ Click Outgoing Server (SMTP)/then CLICK... EDIT on the default settings for your server. Make sure the box is NOT checked to authenticate... in that pop up box. I apologize if you have already done this, but there is more than one authenticate box in SM, and this is what happened to me, Thanks. I am now sending email with SM2.0. How could I miss something so obvious. (oh...it wasn't that obvious. :-)) jim when I upgraded to 2.0. Tht box had been checked to authenticate, although it wasn't needed by my ISP [or in my previous settings]. When I changed this, my problems went away. HTH someone. bj ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:43:01 -0800 (PST), JeffM jef...@email.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: If more folks would use and give feedback on the _pre-release_ versions of SeaMonkey, perhaps the point-zero release wouldn't be so traumatic. As it is, apparently eveyone waits till the formal release then gets their knickers in a knot and can't wait to bitch. All well and good, Jeff, but the problem that stymied me for several days did not appear in the last Beta release. (Or at least the Beta version of 2.0 available for download from the official Seamonkey site about two weeks before the certified ready for prime time point-zero release.) That beta was installed on a different machine but one running the same operating system as the one where I installed the official 2.0 which would not send email for several days. jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wanted: 'Copy image location' on image context menu
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:03:41 +0530, Rex rexduderemoveandreversedom...@liam.ur in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Rex wrote: If I want to copy the link of an image in SM2, it's a rather tedious process- rightclick-properties, then drag to select n copy the link from the dialog that pops up. You'll find that Copy Image copies both the source URL and the image itself to the clipboard, except for Linux where this is currently broken. See Bug 469481. I tried to add Copy Image Location for all platforms there but it was not accepted. Once the Linux core issue is fixed the extra context menu item there will probably be removed again. Cool, I didn't know that! Makes more sense actually.. Thanks for the tip. Yes, it is cool. I wonder which other email clients will do that. I have been using it for some time to transport images from web sites... I discovered it by accident a coupla years ago... Windows users should keep in mind that the 'printscreen' key sends a copy of your entire current desktop to the clipboard and alt-printscreen sends the current active window (such as a dialogue box) to clipboard from where it can be pasted directly into an email or other application. I usually use ctrl-v to paste. jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: any way to collapse news servers......
sharon: so they don't show all the groups? I have 3 servers, this morning one was collapsed the other 2 were not. - user.js - user_pref(news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane, true); --- Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: any way to collapse news servers......
sharon schrieb: so they don't show all the groups? I have 3 servers, this morning one was collapsed the other 2 were not. This afternoon they were all expanded, no big deal, I can get used to closing than opening the servers to get message counts. TIA You can search for the preference news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane in about:config and set it to true. (or add it to your user.js) regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: New Profile Solved Problem, Now What?
Brooke Clarke schrieb: Hi: The browser did not work at all and was not seeing images in email. After creating a new profile the browser now works and the images show up in email. How to migrate my old messages to the new profile? - Create the mail-account in the new profile like you had in the old one - close SM - copy inbox, sent, etc. from old profile to new profile - restart SM regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: A bug in SMTP dialog box/prompt?
Ant schrieb: I know that, but why did the prompt allow me to highlight that text? That shouldn't happen and sounds like a bug. feel free to file one ;-) Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Enlarge/Decrease fonts sizes only on the fly?
Ant wrote: I love it too, but it keeps crashing for me like on http://www.facebook.com/editaccount.php?notificationsmd=cGhvdG9fY29tbWVudDtm +cm9tPTEwMDAwMDEyMzgyOTg1Mjt1aWQ9MTAwOTEyOTE5OTtwaWQ9NTM4OTUwO3RvPTEwMDkxMjkxOTk= +mid=e75fadG3c2616efGb8881bG9 (doesn't even show the web page yet), http://bbc.co.uk/, etc. :( No problem for me. I don't/won't use Facebook. I spend too much time on usenet even to consider it. -- David Wilkinson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Don't get mail when I open the browser
Mr. Cheese wrote: Rex wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: In previous versions/editions of SM email would not be retrieved until I started the email program. In 2.0 mail is loaded when I start the browser. This might not seem to be a problem but let me explain. I have a laptop that I use when I travel. This week I started it to install new software from the web and update XP, etc. Email was retrieved while I was browsing. Now when I returned to my base system the email was no longer retrieved because SM thought was already read. Is there a setting that I couldn't find to suppress retrieval until the email program is started? Did you even look at the preferences pane before posting the question? It's RIGHT THERE when you go to mail newsgroups preferences - a checkbox titled 'Only check mail when I start Mail Newsgroups'!! If you've enabled that option and are still seeing this problem, well that's another matter. - Deliver yesterday, code today, think tomorrow. - Mea Culpa. I was looking in the Mail and News Group ACCOUNT settings. Thx to all who tried to help. You should also be able to set the mail program not to download messages automatically. At least in previous versions you could (under Server settings for EACH account). So if I have two computers both running SeaMonkey at the same time, I set one not to download messages and let the other handle mail. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: any way to collapse news servers......
Martin Freitag wrote: sharon schrieb: so they don't show all the groups? I have 3 servers, this morning one was collapsed the other 2 were not. This afternoon they were all expanded, no big deal, I can get used to closing than opening the servers to get message counts. TIA You can search for the preference news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane in about:config and set it to true. (or add it to your user.js) regards Martin thank you very much! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: any way to collapse news servers......
Hartmut Figge wrote: user_pref(news.persist_server_open_state_in_folderpane, true Thank you! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Works correctly here Seamonkey 1.1.18 Win7 pro ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 No, NO NO!! Its not the install of 2.0 that's reporting the wrong UA, its your 1.1.18!!! And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ Totslly useless information snipped. I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.1 You got right in because the UA string which *you* reported in another thread is incorrect. Someone, either you or someone with access to your machine permanently changed the UA string. SeaMonkey will not do this by itself. SeaMonkey is not going to report a UA of an antiquated version of Firefox without user intervention. If it was not you, it was someone with access to your machine. I dare you to try creating a new profile in SeaMonkey 1.1.18, and see if you can get in. Create this new profile, and report it back here. It *will* show the correct UA for SeaMonkey. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Please disregard anything Bush has to say on this subject, his 1.1.18 UA is spoofed to Firefox 2.0.0.7, and he does not seem to understand that. SM 1.1.18 will not do any better then Sm 2.0 in this case. I get the same result as you when I use the correct User Agent for SeaMonkey 2.0. When I change the UA, using the Preferences Toolbar, I can get it to work as it should, spoofing as FF 2.0. I suggest writing them to tell tem of the problem, it should be easy to fix on their end. As a short term fix, changing the UA, using either the UA switcher extension, or the PrefBar will get it to work. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
BeeNeR wrote: On or about 11/30/2009 9:35 PM, Bush typed the following: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Works correctly here Seamonkey 1.1.18 Win7 pro Also FAILS here. Windows XP SP3 SM2.0 Works OK with IE Tab. Where did you find IE Tab that works with SM2.0? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Bush wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Works correctly here Seamonkey 1.1.18 Win7 pro It only works because your user agent string reports Firefox, not SeaMonkey. Heck, here it is from your headers: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Blast it, it says Firefox, not SeaMonkey. That is the only reason it works for you. Open 1.1.18, click ToolsSwitch Profile. Use that to open Profile Manager. Create a new profile, call it Test. Open 1.1.18 in that test profile, and try to get into the sites you say work. You will fail. Click About SeaMonkey and check the string. It will say SeaMonkey 1.1.18, not Firefox 2.0.0.7. Try it and lets put this nonsense to rest. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.18 Yes you did - you spoofed Firefox just fine: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Now, toddle along enjoy your ignorance. But if you'd really like to understand what/when/where, why not try being such an ass and work with the folks who are _trying_ to help you? Please click 'Help|About SeaMonkey' and tell us what shows under 'SeaMonkey 1.1.18'. Don't be afraid, you can copy and paste the result here. My guess is that it will show: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 and you'll find that Firefox/2.0.0.7 is *not* a valid/normal UA in a standard SeaMonkey install. Somewhere along the line you, or whoever installed SeaMonkey for you, added the Firefox/2.0.0.7 into your profile for Firefox spoofing. That's not necessarily a bad thing (subject to some debate), but just understand it is *not* standard and is there for Fx spoofing. Please tell us what you see when you enter: about:plugins Just the header/main such as: Default Plugin Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_16 etc. Now enter: about:config and enter: firefox in the Filter box. What do you see? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Please disregard anything Bush has to say on this subject, his 1.1.18 UA is spoofed to Firefox 2.0.0.7, and he does not seem to understand that. SM 1.1.18 will not do any better then Sm 2.0 in this case. I get the same result as you when I use the correct User Agent for SeaMonkey 2.0. When I change the UA, using the Preferences Toolbar, I can get it to work as it should, spoofing as FF 2.0. I suggest writing them to tell tem of the problem, it should be easy to fix on their end. As a short term fix, changing the UA, using either the UA switcher extension, or the PrefBar will get it to work. Lee OK by this if I spoof the UA which I did by installing (User Agent Switcher) and spoofed IE-7. However, this did not get it to work, the only way it works is to use Internet Explorer. Any ideas on how to get this to work, I hate having to run IE. Thank you everyone. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SMTP parameter in SM2 after having migrated from SM1
jim wrote: On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:49:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: jim wrote: On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:09:40 +0100, obones obones_g...@fds_free.fr in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: Hello all, I'm currently reviewing SM2 and when I installed it I told it to import the settings from my existing SM1 installation. All email accounts got imported, along with the SMTP server definition. While I can send emails just fine in SM1, I always get an error when sending emails with SM2. The error says this: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server SERVER_NAME. The serer does not support any compatible insecure authentication mechanism but you have chosen insecure authentication. Try switching on secure authentication or contact your service provider. I tried turning on TLS or even SSL, but none of these are provided by the given server. What I find weird is that it worked and continues to work fine in SM1. Obviously, some option has been removed/disabled in SM2, but which one? Is there a way to reactivate it? Thanks My situation is that I can receive just gangbusters with SM2. But it refuses to send, giving the SMTP-AUTH message. However, the server settings show no security, no Auth. Let me know if you get it working and most of all, how you did it. I think that may be your problem, you have to match your settings to the server, if it wants auth you have to provide it. Since I don't know what your server wants I can't be sure, but there's a reasonable possibility that you need to configure auth. Not only that, but secure auth, like TLS+SSL (I forget the exact choice in the list), but it's not the checkbox, it's the menu about 1/3 down the screen. Thanks. I will try that one. jim I am experiencing similar problems, and went so far as to ask our systems people at the University of Delaware to check it out; they downloaded Seamonkey 2.0 and couldn't get it to work with our servers with any combination of settings (Seamonkey 1.x worked fine). I also have been unable to get the SMTP settings to work with Speakeasy's SMTP server (my isp), which had no problem with Seamonkey 1.x; I tried authentication on and off, as well as playing with multiple options. So far, the only SMTP server that's worked for me is google. Are there some compatibility issues in the new setting options? Thanks for any suggesitonsTom ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 No, NO NO!! Its not the install of 2.0 that's reporting the wrong UA, its your 1.1.18!!! And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ Totslly useless information snipped. I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.1 You got right in because the UA string which *you* reported in another thread is incorrect. Someone, either you or someone with access to your machine permanently changed the UA string. SeaMonkey will not do this by itself. SeaMonkey is not going to report a UA of an antiquated version of Firefox without user intervention. If it was not you, it was someone with access to your machine. I dare you to try creating a new profile in SeaMonkey 1.1.18, and see if you can get in. Create this new profile, and report it back here. It *will* show the correct UA for SeaMonkey. Lee I already created a new profile and it Reads the Same . I even uninstalled 1.1.18 and Deleted all files and even wiped the folders . And dowloaded Seamonkey 1.1.18 again and installed it . Remade the profile . and here is what it says SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Now Tell me How you Spoof it . Where Do i type in SPOOF ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Danny Kile wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: /snip/ I suggest writing them to tell tem of the problem, it should be easy to fix on their end. As a short term fix, changing the UA, using either the UA switcher extension, or the PrefBar will get it to work. Lee OK by this if I spoof the UA which I did by installing (User Agent Switcher) and spoofed IE-7. However, this did not get it to work, the only way it works is to use Internet Explorer. Any ideas on how to get this to work, I hate having to run IE. Thank you everyone. Okay, lets consider why sites sniff for browsers. Their plan is to serve different versions to users with specific browsers. I got it work by spoofing Firefox. You spoofed IE, and it did not work, probably because the version served was for the IE rendering engine. SeaMonkey has the same gecko rendering engine as Firefox. Always try spoofing Firefox first, that is most likely to work with SeaMonkey. By the way, you asked earlier about a version of IE tab that would work with 2.0, yet you state that you hate running IE. Using IE tab in SeaMonkey just converts SM to an IE shell, you might as well be running IE. Not that this is a crime, but just a point to consider. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 No, NO NO!! Its not the install of 2.0 that's reporting the wrong UA, its your 1.1.18!!! And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ Totslly useless information snipped. I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.1 You got right in because the UA string which *you* reported in another thread is incorrect. Someone, either you or someone with access to your machine permanently changed the UA string. SeaMonkey will not do this by itself. SeaMonkey is not going to report a UA of an antiquated version of Firefox without user intervention. If it was not you, it was someone with access to your machine. I dare you to try creating a new profile in SeaMonkey 1.1.18, and see if you can get in. Create this new profile, and report it back here. It *will* show the correct UA for SeaMonkey. Lee I already created a new profile and it Reads the Same . I even uninstalled 1.1.18 and Deleted all files and even wiped the folders . And dowloaded Seamonkey 1.1.18 again and installed it . Remade the profile . and here is what it says SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Now Tell me How you Spoof it . Where Do i type in SPOOF ? Reply in full to NoOP's post. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
IMAP cleanup behavior question
I've configured SM2.0 to access my Gmail via IMAP. I've seen the options for cleanup/sync, and from what I understand, it lets you delete messages by age or by count- but both from server and locally. The sync option above lets you synchronize messages based on no. of days. I don't want to delete my old mails- I have em dating back to 2004 when I first created my gmail account. So correct me if I'm wrong, is this how it works?- -Sync is set to last 15 days, so only mails from the last 15 days get downloaded. -But if I set it to cleanup messages (either the last x no. of messages or by age), it will delete everything, including older mails (which may not have been downloaded and only have headers) Is there a way to retain headers of older mails but not delete them- yet keep flushing out the downloaded mail bodies of the previous x no. of days? - I used to be schizophrenic, but we're ok now. - ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.18 Yes you did - you spoofed Firefox just fine: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Now, toddle along enjoy your ignorance. But if you'd really like to understand what/when/where, why not try being such an ass and work with the folks who are _trying_ to help you? Please click 'Help|About SeaMonkey' and tell us what shows under 'SeaMonkey 1.1.18'. Don't be afraid, you can copy and paste the result here. My guess is that it will show: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 and you'll find that Firefox/2.0.0.7 is *not* a valid/normal UA in a standard SeaMonkey install. Somewhere along the line you, or whoever installed SeaMonkey for you, added the Firefox/2.0.0.7 into your profile for Firefox spoofing. That's not necessarily a bad thing (subject to some debate), but just understand it is *not* standard and is there for Fx spoofing. Please tell us what you see when you enter: about:plugins Just the header/main such as: Default Plugin Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_16 etc. File name: npoji610.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla MIME Type Description SuffixesEnabled application/x-java-vm JavaYes Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U17 File name: npjpi160_17.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla Now enter: about:config and enter: firefox in the Filter box. What do you see? Nothing Happens . after pushing Enter Key . Bottom screen goes Blank if I enter Seamonkey I get I only have one hand so hopefully I get this corect general.useragent.extra.seamonkey userset string firefox/2.0.0.7 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
To all those claiming that SM 2.0 is 'junk'..
It looks like all the problems are due to migrating from 1.x. I'm a new user of Seamonkey- I discovered it about a week before 2.0 released and so I've used nothing but 2.0 from the start. Aside from a few minor bugs that I've got solutions for here, I find it extremely stable and loads pages faster than Firefox (then again I have about 70 extensions on my Firefox profile). - The problem with paradigms is that shift happens. - ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM 2.0 mail is not using the default profile, even after selecting it manually HELP!
I used SM 1.1.18 and tried to upgrade to 2.0 but after downloading and copying it to the Application folder, it only shows the new mail profile wizard it doesnt recognize my old SM existing default profile with all my emails and accounts I tried selecting manually with Manage Profile and selected it manually but it did not workedCan anyone HELP ME get SM2.0 to use my existing profile in Mail? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Works correctly here Seamonkey 1.1.18 Win7 pro It only works because your user agent string reports Firefox, not SeaMonkey. Heck, here it is from your headers: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Blast it, it says Firefox, not SeaMonkey. That is the only reason it works for you. Open 1.1.18, click ToolsSwitch Profile. Use that to open Profile Manager. Create a new profile, call it Test. Open 1.1.18 in that test profile, and try to get into the sites you say work. You will fail. Click About SeaMonkey and check the string. It will say SeaMonkey 1.1.18, not Firefox 2.0.0.7. Try it and lets put this nonsense to rest. Lee Better yet I will try it on my Wifes computer , Then on my Daughters computer ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.18 Yes you did - you spoofed Firefox just fine: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Now, toddle along enjoy your ignorance. But if you'd really like to understand what/when/where, why not try being such an ass and work with the folks who are _trying_ to help you? Please click 'Help|About SeaMonkey' and tell us what shows under 'SeaMonkey 1.1.18'. Don't be afraid, you can copy and paste the result here. My guess is that it will show: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 and you'll find that Firefox/2.0.0.7 is *not* a valid/normal UA in a standard SeaMonkey install. Somewhere along the line you, or whoever installed SeaMonkey for you, added the Firefox/2.0.0.7 into your profile for Firefox spoofing. That's not necessarily a bad thing (subject to some debate), but just understand it is *not* standard and is there for Fx spoofing. Please tell us what you see when you enter: about:plugins Just the header/main such as: Default Plugin Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_16 etc. File name: npoji610.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled application/x-java-vm Java Yes Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U17 File name: npjpi160_17.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla Now enter: about:config and enter: firefox in the Filter box. What do you see? Nothing Happens . after pushing Enter Key . Bottom screen goes Blank if I enter Seamonkey I get I only have one hand so hopefully I get this corect general.useragent.extra.seamonkey userset string firefox/2.0.0.7 AHA!! Note, *userset*!!! Note that the pref is probably in bold. That tells us that a user has changed the default setting. Right click on the pref and choose reset. That will set it back to the default setting. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Danny Kile wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Please disregard anything Bush has to say on this subject, his 1.1.18 UA is spoofed to Firefox 2.0.0.7, and he does not seem to understand that. SM 1.1.18 will not do any better then Sm 2.0 in this case. I get the same result as you when I use the correct User Agent for SeaMonkey 2.0. When I change the UA, using the Preferences Toolbar, I can get it to work as it should, spoofing as FF 2.0. I suggest writing them to tell tem of the problem, it should be easy to fix on their end. As a short term fix, changing the UA, using either the UA switcher extension, or the PrefBar will get it to work. Lee OK by this if I spoof the UA which I did by installing (User Agent Switcher) and spoofed IE-7. However, this did not get it to work, the only way it works is to use Internet Explorer. Any ideas on how to get this to work, I hate having to run IE. Thank you everyone. just went to my wifes computer and it Has seamonkey 1.1.14 Win xp And it Views the Site perfectly . SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Works correctly here Seamonkey 1.1.18 Win7 pro It only works because your user agent string reports Firefox, not SeaMonkey. Heck, here it is from your headers: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Blast it, it says Firefox, not SeaMonkey. That is the only reason it works for you. Open 1.1.18, click ToolsSwitch Profile. Use that to open Profile Manager. Create a new profile, call it Test. Open 1.1.18 in that test profile, and try to get into the sites you say work. You will fail. Click About SeaMonkey and check the string. It will say SeaMonkey 1.1.18, not Firefox 2.0.0.7. Try it and lets put this nonsense to rest. Lee Better yet I will try it on my Wifes computer , Then on my Daughters computer Unless someone has reset the ua on them. Check the about:config pref to see if iit is also marked userset. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: To all those claiming that SM 2.0 is 'junk'..
Rex wrote: It looks like all the problems are due to migrating from 1.x. I'm a new user of Seamonkey- I discovered it about a week before 2.0 released and so I've used nothing but 2.0 from the start. Aside from a few minor bugs that I've got solutions for here, I find it extremely stable and loads pages faster than Firefox (then again I have about 70 extensions on my Firefox profile). - The problem with paradigms is that shift happens. - I had a lot of trouble installing the last version of 1.1.xx and finally gave up, installed a beta of 2, transferred over some files, had to transfer passwords by hand. I have had no trouble with 2.0. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.18 Yes you did - you spoofed Firefox just fine: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Now, toddle along enjoy your ignorance. But if you'd really like to understand what/when/where, why not try being such an ass and work with the folks who are _trying_ to help you? Please click 'Help|About SeaMonkey' and tell us what shows under 'SeaMonkey 1.1.18'. Don't be afraid, you can copy and paste the result here. My guess is that it will show: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 and you'll find that Firefox/2.0.0.7 is *not* a valid/normal UA in a standard SeaMonkey install. Somewhere along the line you, or whoever installed SeaMonkey for you, added the Firefox/2.0.0.7 into your profile for Firefox spoofing. That's not necessarily a bad thing (subject to some debate), but just understand it is *not* standard and is there for Fx spoofing. Please tell us what you see when you enter: about:plugins Just the header/main such as: Default Plugin Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_16 etc. File name: npoji610.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled application/x-java-vm Java Yes Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U17 File name: npjpi160_17.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla Now enter: about:config and enter: firefox in the Filter box. What do you see? Nothing Happens . after pushing Enter Key . Bottom screen goes Blank if I enter Seamonkey I get I only have one hand so hopefully I get this corect general.useragent.extra.seamonkey userset string firefox/2.0.0.7 AHA!! Note, *userset*!!! Note that the pref is probably in bold. That tells us that a user has changed the default setting. Right click on the pref and choose reset. That will set it back to the default setting. Lee yes the whole line was in Bold ... Everyone in my home Has their own computers . I am the only one who uses this one . Could it Be that Win 7 uninstaller left seamonker 2.0 setting in the Registry ? look at my answer when I went to my wifes computer that has Seamonkey 1.1.14 I Sent her about seamonkey to me SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx and the above link works on hers. I almost got Killed for waking her up. Almost hat a tiger wood situation .. You think I am a Dick or pulling your chain. But in No way did I So called Spoof Seamonkey . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Please disregard anything Bush has to say on this subject, his 1.1.18 UA is spoofed to Firefox 2.0.0.7, and he does not seem to understand that. SM 1.1.18 will not do any better then Sm 2.0 in this case. I get the same result as you when I use the correct User Agent for SeaMonkey 2.0. When I change the UA, using the Preferences Toolbar, I can get it to work as it should, spoofing as FF 2.0. I suggest writing them to tell tem of the problem, it should be easy to fix on their end. As a short term fix, changing the UA, using either the UA switcher extension, or the PrefBar will get it to work. Lee OK by this if I spoof the UA which I did by installing (User Agent Switcher) and spoofed IE-7. However, this did not get it to work, the only way it works is to use Internet Explorer. Any ideas on how to get this to work, I hate having to run IE. Thank you everyone. just went to my wifes computer and it Has seamonkey 1.1.14 Win xp And it Views the Site perfectly . SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx SeaMonkey does display the site. Note the OP's post, click o one of the shows in the listings at the bottom. It is supposed to give information on the show. Without UA spoofing, it shows a block white box. Nice Red colors ... as stated it works fine . Is that working for you? Also, try your government site on your wife's computer. Yes there are no problem with the Blm site . And by the way All my wife does on her computer is Read and Send email and play Games and chat on http://www.pogo.com. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: /snip/ general.useragent.extra.seamonkey userset string firefox/2.0.0.7 AHA!! Note, *userset*!!! Note that the pref is probably in bold. That tells us that a user has changed the default setting. Right click on the pref and choose reset. That will set it back to the default setting. Lee yes the whole line was in Bold ... Everyone in my home Has their own computers . I am the only one who uses this one . Could it Be that Win 7 uninstaller left seamonker 2.0 setting in the Registry ? look at my answer when I went to my wifes computer that has Seamonkey 1.1.14 I Sent her about seamonkey to me SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx and the above link works on hers. I almost got Killed for waking her up. Almost hat a tiger wood situation .. You think I am a Dick or pulling your chain. But in No way did I So called Spoof Seamonkey . I admit, I am getting frustrated, but I sense we are getting some light at the end of the tunnel. The SeaMonkey UA will say SeaMonkey 2.0. Here is mine, note I am on a Mac: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 Lightning/1.0pre Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 SeaMonkey/2.0 Your wife has SM 1.1.14. I suggest updating that to 1.1.18, by the way. The TVGuide page does seem to work without spoofing, but note Danny's original post, with the following: When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. So, rather then just opening the page, you have to go to the program listings, then click on a show to see details. If SM has its proper UA, it will show a blank space. If it is spoofed as FF, it will work. You, or someone using your computer did change the UA. There is no other way for this to happen. I can see how SM *might* reset to its default on its own, but there is no way it will change the UA to an antiquated version of Firefox on its own. FF 2.0.0.7 was released over two years ago. It is certainly possible that you had a problem viewing a site, were advised to reset the UA to the then current version of Firefox, and, over these more then two years, forgot that you had done it. I know that I can not certainly swear to things I did over two years ago. Anyhow, if you reset the pref in about:config as I described elsewhere, you will find that reverting to 1.1.18 is not an answer to these kind of problems. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: /snip/ general.useragent.extra.seamonkey userset string firefox/2.0.0.7 AHA!! Note, *userset*!!! Note that the pref is probably in bold. That tells us that a user has changed the default setting. Right click on the pref and choose reset. That will set it back to the default setting. Lee yes the whole line was in Bold ... Everyone in my home Has their own computers . I am the only one who uses this one . Could it Be that Win 7 uninstaller left seamonker 2.0 setting in the Registry ? look at my answer when I went to my wifes computer that has Seamonkey 1.1.14 I Sent her about seamonkey to me SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx and the above link works on hers. I almost got Killed for waking her up. Almost hat a tiger wood situation .. You think I am a Dick or pulling your chain. But in No way did I So called Spoof Seamonkey . I admit, I am getting frustrated, but I sense we are getting some light at the end of the tunnel. The SeaMonkey UA will say SeaMonkey 2.0. Here is mine, note I am on a Mac: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 Lightning/1.0pre Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 SeaMonkey/2.0 Your wife has SM 1.1.14. I suggest updating that to 1.1.18, by the way. The TVGuide page does seem to work without spoofing, but note Danny's original post, with the following: When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. Just tried my computer at tvguid and clicked a show showing on HBO and I get a RED box with a desription of the movie . So, rather then just opening the page, you have to go to the program listings, then click on a show to see details. If SM has its proper UA, it will show a blank space. If it is spoofed as FF, it will work. I wish it were Daytime.. I would go try it on my wifes computer . But I do not need her Chasing me down the driveway with a Golf Club . You, or someone using your computer did change the UA. There is no other way for this to happen. I can see how SM *might* reset to its default on its own, but there is no way it will change the UA to an antiquated version of Firefox on its own. Sorry .. I do all the computer repair here . And no way did I mess with any setting other That What is in the Menu's . FF 2.0.0.7 was released over two years ago. It is certainly possible that you had a problem viewing a site, were advised to reset the UA to the then current version of Firefox, and, over these more then two years, forgot that you had done it. I know that I can not certainly swear to things I did over two years ago. I got interested in my Family history, After I lost my hand. on April 1, 1998 . And I created a cd that I gave to all my relatives ( starting around 2001) with the info I discovered . and a lot of that info came from the Blm site I only started having problems when I installed seamonkey 2.0 , It looks suspicious to you, But I have never installed Firefox or thunderbird on any of the computers Here . But that is Beside the point Because when win 7 was released ( I bought it From microsoft ) I bought a new Sata Drive . installed win7 pro and then Seamonkey 1.1.18 Then I saw that 2.0 was on the seamonkey site as the Current release .. Uninstalled 1.1.18 and installed 2.0 . Had too many problems access e-mail and certain sites, So I uninstalled 2.0 and reinstalled 1.1.18 and Now u say I spoofed it ... Anyhow, if you reset the pref in about:config as I described elsewhere, you will find that reverting to 1.1.18 is not an answer to these kind of problems. Right now I donot think I should mess with something that is access all the websites . I know u are trying to figure out WHY . and I hope your Conversations May help the develpers figure this out in the Future . Thanks for the help Lee .I may answer some more of you inquiries later. But typing with one hand makes the good Hand Hurt .. I already lost one hand and do not want to loose the remaining one . Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
On 11/30/2009 6:35 PM, Bush wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Works correctly here Seamonkey 1.1.18 Win7 pro Yes, but you have already shown us that you spoof Firefox even though you claim not to know what spoofing is. If you did not spoof Firefox in SM 1.1.18 it would not work. And if you did spoof Firefox in SM 2.0 it would work. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: /snip/ /snip/ Just tried my computer at tvguid and clicked a show showing on HBO and I get a RED box with a desription of the movie . If you did not reset the about:config pref as i described, yes that is what would happen. The site thinks you are using Firefox, and serves you a working version. /snip/ You, or someone using your computer did change the UA. There is no other way for this to happen. I can see how SM *might* reset to its default on its own, but there is no way it will change the UA to an antiquated version of Firefox on its own. Sorry .. I do all the computer repair here . And no way did I mess with any setting other That What is in the Menu's . I can't say anything more then I have already said, some user reset the pref. *userset* means some *user* *set* the pref. There is no other way for it to happen. /snip/ I only started having problems when I installed seamonkey 2.0 , It looks suspicious to you, But I have never installed Firefox or thunderbird on any of the computers Here . But that is Beside the point Because when win 7 was released ( I bought it From microsoft ) I bought a new Sata Drive . installed win7 pro and then Seamonkey 1.1.18 Then I saw that 2.0 was on the seamonkey site as the Current release .. Uninstalled 1.1.18 and installed 2.0 . Had too many problems access e-mail and certain sites, So I uninstalled 2.0 and reinstalled 1.1.18 and Now u say I spoofed it ... You installed SeaMonkey 1.1.18 first. Did you transfer settings and files from your previous windows installation? Specifically, did you transfer your 1.1.18 profile from your previous Windows installation? If so, anything you did with SeaMonkey 1.1.18 was carried over. Heck, I've forgotten about more things I've done with computers then I remember. I've often switched the UA to troubleshoot an issue, then forgot that I did it. Fortunately the Prefbar extension reset it as the true UA on a restart, or all of you might be wondering how I am posting here in IE6 on XP :) Anyhow, if you reset the pref in about:config as I described elsewhere, you will find that reverting to 1.1.18 is not an answer to these kind of problems. Right now I donot think I should mess with something that is access all the websites . I know u are trying to figure out WHY . and I hope your Conversations May help the develpers figure this out in the Future . The problem with a permanent UA spoofing is that the web sites' logs will indicate that any visit you make with is with Firefox, not SeaMonkey. These web site developers will then have no real reason to update their browser sniffers to include SeaMonkey. What I do when I encounter such a site is to spoof the UA to Firefox. If I am successful in getting in, I write the web developer of that site to tell them that SeaMonkey can in fact deliver their page accurately, and ask them to adjust their browser sniffer accordingly. I'm not saying that you should go that far. However, if you leave your UA permanently spoofed, you are not helping to broaden web access for SeaMonkey. The user does play an important part here. I would suggest returning to the true UA. Then, via an extension such as Preference Toolbar, or the UA switcher, switch the us on an as needed basis. That way, at least the web logs will indicate a attempted visit by SeaMonkey, so an tech evangelism attempt will have more credence. Thanks for the help Lee .I may answer some more of you inquiries later. But typing with one hand makes the good Hand Hurt .. I already lost one hand and do not want to loose the remaining one . One of our valued contributors here types one handed as well. (Hi Daniel) I don't have any personal experience with one handed typing, but I manage to do badly enough with two hands :) I do appreciate your efforts in improving this valued suite. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Bug in text areas
I've noticed this when typing in a text area. I've typed some text, and then changed focus from the textarea. When I click back on it, nothing happens unless I click exactly where I was last editing. I click anywhere else, the textarea does not acquire focus, the mouse arrow remains an arrow (doesn't change to the text cursor) and the cursor does not appear. To put it another way, if I click on a text area that has text in it, I expect the text cursor to appear where I clicked. This does not happen. If I click at the last letter that I typed, then the cursor appears, and I have to navigate by keyboard to get back to where I want to edit. - Pentium instruction of the day: FLI: Flash Lights Impressively - ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
RE: Welcome to the support-seamonkey mailing list
HI, Im making a website with the a wmv file in the website. The link won't open the movie from the page but if I click on the wmv final in the folder it will open the movie what is the correct code i need to put after the wmv file to have it open in windows media player? Thanks again. Subject: Welcome to the support-seamonkey mailing list From: support-seamonkey-requ...@lists.mozilla.org To: leapinglizards1...@live.com Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:08:17 -0800 Welcome to the support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org mailing list! To post to this list, send your email to: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org General information about the mailing list is at: https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: https://lists.mozilla.org/options/support-seamonkey/leapinglizards1234%40live.com You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: support-seamonkey-requ...@lists.mozilla.org with the word `help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. It is: history1 Mailman can remind you of your lists.mozilla.org mailing list passwords once every month, although since most people don't like having their passwords mailed in the clear, this is disabled by default. If you prefer, you can enable this in your account options. There is a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. _ Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurantsform=MFESRPpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MFESRP_Local_MapsMenu_Resturants_1x1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
On 11/30/2009 6:21 PM, Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx This is bug #330094. It was reported to the Mozilla community about 3-1/2 years ago, for Camino 1.0. Less than two weeks later, it was also noted to occur in a very early alpha version of SeaMonkey 2.0 (1.5a). About a month after this bug was reported, a duplicate bug reported the problem against Firefox 1.5.0.2. While the www.tvguide.com site has apparently been upgraded to work with Firefox, bug #330094 remains open since the site still fails to work with other Gecko browsers. The correct fix -- to sniff for Gecko and not for Firefox -- was never implemented. Someone who frequently visits the site (which is not me) should report the problem with a reference to http://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Sardisson/Gecko_is_Gecko and to the bug report at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330094. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
code for wmv file to play as a link
HI, Im making a website with the a wmv file in the website. The link won't open the movie from the page but if I click on the wmv final in the folder it will open the movie what is the correct code i need to put after the wmv file to have it open in windows media player? Thanks again. _ Get gifts for them and cashback for you. Try Bing now. http://www.bing.com/shopping/search?q=xbox+gamesscope=cashbackform=MSHYCBpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MSHYCB_Shopping_Giftsforthem_cashback_1x1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: /snip/ I suggest writing them to tell tem of the problem, it should be easy to fix on their end. As a short term fix, changing the UA, using either the UA switcher extension, or the PrefBar will get it to work. Lee OK by this if I spoof the UA which I did by installing (User Agent Switcher) and spoofed IE-7. However, this did not get it to work, the only way it works is to use Internet Explorer. Any ideas on how to get this to work, I hate having to run IE. Thank you everyone. Okay, lets consider why sites sniff for browsers. Their plan is to serve different versions to users with specific browsers. I got it work by spoofing Firefox. You spoofed IE, and it did not work, probably because the version served was for the IE rendering engine. SeaMonkey has the same gecko rendering engine as Firefox. Always try spoofing Firefox first, that is most likely to work with SeaMonkey. By the way, you asked earlier about a version of IE tab that would work with 2.0, yet you state that you hate running IE. Using IE tab in SeaMonkey just converts SM to an IE shell, you might as well be running IE. Not that this is a crime, but just a point to consider. Lee I rather run IE in a SM tab, it is more convenient to run. I use User Agent Switcher to switch UA, it does not list one for Firefox. It has an add function put I do not know what to add, can you help me with this? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: /snip/ /snip/ I rather run IE in a SM tab, it is more convenient to run. I use User Agent Switcher to switch UA, it does not list one for Firefox. It has an add function put I do not know what to add, can you help me with this? I'm not saying that is wrong to do, but using IETab for a SeaMonkey tab is basically using IE in a SeaMonkey shell. I've never used UA switcher, but your current UA is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 Change that to: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 Firefox/3.5.5 Add that you your UA Switcher, and it should do the trick. Lee Thank you, Lee. Adding that line to the UA Switcher and spoofing FireFox did the trick without having to run IE Tab. Thank you again! Danny ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
