Ray_Net schrieb:
Nobody can help me ?
Is it enough that i post this(as it is now) to bugzilla ?
Looks like you have run an acceptable amount of tests ;-)
regards
Martin
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.asciiribbon.org/index-de.html
Paul wrote:
John wrote:
Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0
vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a
username password for email accounts. ugly.
I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went
to SM 1117. I am still with 1117.
I should
Since my previous problems had disappeared, without any real solution,
I'm pretty happy with 2.0.1.
Only two things to complain about:
1. No quick start button. I really miss that!
2. No way to disable having to enter a password when initializing SM
without deleting ALL web, password,
Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is
(AFAICT) SM 2.0?
--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
David Wilkinson wrote:
Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official version is
(AFAICT) SM 2.0?
I know about using nighties I used to do that myself to test and
comment. When the comments went in one ear and out the other I quit
using nighties. I figured my comments
NoOp wrote:
On 12/14/2009 01:08 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/13/2009 08:53 PM, JAS wrote:
Is there a way to add Bing to the search engine preference so it can be
set as default?
You could modify one of the seamonkey/searchplugins .src files to use bing.
Note here is the
mcewr wrote:
I have noticed a couple of things since I upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0:
1. The mail in my POP accounts doesn't seem to automatically download at
startup.
2. I can't send large attachments anymore (window stops at 3%).
Does anyone know if these are 2.0 bugs?
Thanks,
Rod
item 1
Edit
LDixon wrote:
I'm glad that SeaMonkey has maintained Netscape Composer.
But, I was surprised to find that it hasn't been improved at all, that
I can see.
Here are a few suggestions:
* Put a scroll bar in the Format/Font menu, for speed. (I use Ariel
and Verdana a lot!)
* Put the font
Phillip Jones wrote:
mcewr wrote:
I have noticed a couple of things since I upgraded to Seamonkey 2.0:
1. The mail in my POP accounts doesn't seem to automatically download at
startup.
2. I can't send large attachments anymore (window stops at 3%).
Does anyone know if these are 2.0 bugs?
On 12/14/09 12:23 PM, art wrote:
On 12/14/09 8:43 AM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 14/12/2009 03:05, Rex told the world:
I've often seen this happen:
Let's say I have tabs A,B,C in order. Each one displays its own favicon.
I either open a 3rd tab adjacent to B(I use 'Tabs
Cedar wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Martin Freitag wrote:
Cedar schrieb:
On a dialup connection, would it be normal to suffer extreme
slowdowns and pauses in the internet connection because of blocking cookies?
Nope.
Any chance this is just seasonal traffic increase due to Christmas
shoppers
John Doue wrote:
Paul wrote:
John wrote:
Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0
vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a
username password for email accounts. ugly.
I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went
to SM 1117. I am still
BeeNeR wrote:
Only two things to complain about:
1. No quick start button. I really miss that!
Gone for good, sorry.
2. No way to disable having to enter a password when initializing SM
without deleting ALL web, password, certificates, etc. information.
Quoting from the Release Notes:
Phillip Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official
version is
(AFAICT) SM 2.0?
I know about using nighties I used to do that myself to test and
comment. When the comments went in one ear and out the other I quit
using nighties. I
Phillip Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official
version is
(AFAICT) SM 2.0?
But believe I read either in this
forum or perhaps on the SM group, that SM2.0.1 was supposed to come out
the same exact time FF3.5.5 was to hit the
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official
version is
(AFAICT) SM 2.0?
/snip/
So all these people talking about SM 2.0.1 are using the nightlies? I
think you must be right, but this is not generally
On or about 12/15/2009 2:02 PM, Jens Hatlak typed the following:
BeeNeR wrote:
Only two things to complain about:
1. No quick start button. I really miss that!
Gone for good, sorry.
2. No way to disable having to enter a password when initializing SM
without deleting ALL web,
David Wilkinson wrote:
Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official
version is (AFAICT) SM 2.0?
Thanks all. I got it now. It's the release candidate.
--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On 12/15/2009 1:44 PM, Martin Freitag wrote:
Carolyn schrieb:
I just downloaded the latest version of Seamonkey but I do not know
how to set up my email account. When it asks for the server
information, I don't know where to find that information. Can anybody
help me? Carolyn
It should be
hawker wrote:
So I just got to wondering if most of us Seamonkey people are just
Netscape hold ons that are not comfortable with the FireFox/Thunderbird
interface for whatever reason?
Anyone out there a Seamonkey user who was not a Netscape users?
As for me I started on Netscape 1.x though
For all of the changes to Seamonkey they are dwarfed by the changes in
Thunderbird.
On 12/15/2009 8:10 PM, Rufus wrote:
hawker wrote:
So I just got to wondering if most of us Seamonkey people are just
Netscape hold ons that are not comfortable with the
FireFox/Thunderbird interface for
...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are
actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of.
--
- Rufus
rob wrote:
For all of the changes to Seamonkey they are dwarfed by the changes in
Thunderbird.
On 12/15/2009 8:10 PM, Rufus wrote:
hawker
As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process,
SeaMonkey 2.0.1 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free
download from www.seamonkey-project.org.
We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to
this latest release. If you already have
NoOp wrote:
On 12/15/2009 11:21 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Why do I see all the references to SM 2.0.1 when the latest official
version is
(AFAICT) SM 2.0?
But believe I read either in this
forum or perhaps on the SM group, that SM2.0.1 was supposed
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process,
SeaMonkey 2.0.1 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free
download from www.seamonkey-project.org.
We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to
this latest release.
hawker schrieb:
So I just got to wondering if most of us Seamonkey people are just
Netscape hold ons that are not comfortable with the FireFox/Thunderbird
interface for whatever reason?
Their GUI is crippled.
Anyone out there a Seamonkey user who was not a Netscape users?
Yes there are
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are
actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of.
Well, take a good look at eh TB group, there wold seem to be a lot who
disagree.
Lee
I had zero issues with the TB 3.0
Leonidas Jones wrote:
George Carden wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process,
SeaMonkey 2.0.1 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free
download from www.seamonkey-project.org.
We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old
George Carden wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process,
SeaMonkey 2.0.1 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a free
download from www.seamonkey-project.org.
We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey and old suite users upgrade to
On 12/15/09 02:47 am, Martin Freitag wrote:
As I don't have TB, so that's not possible for me to do. But that editor
could be useful also in SM.
Maybe time to file an enhancement bug if it doesn't already exist? ;-)
It's the same as about:config
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:34:11 -0500, hawker wrote:
I'm asking all this because I'm currently questing why I am staying on
Seamonkey. I like a few things about it over Firefox/Thunderbird but
with 2.0 out and many extensions broken or no longer supporting
Seamonkey - all of which still work
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote:
...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are
actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of.
This is surprising since we share the exact same mailnews backend code
as Thunderbird 3.0.
Phil
--
Philip Chee
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote:
...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are
actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of.
This is surprising since we share the exact same mailnews backend code
as Thunderbird 3.0.
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:34:11 -0500, hawker wrote:
I'm asking all this because I'm currently questing why I am staying on
Seamonkey. I like a few things about it over Firefox/Thunderbird but
with 2.0 out and many extensions broken or no longer supporting
Seamonkey - all of
wholesale Heat #3 WADE white nba jersey, replica Miami Heat NBA Jersey
Click Here To Website :
http://www.cnjerseyshop.com/Heat-3-WADE-white-nba-jersey-15282.html
wholesale Miami Heat NBA Jersey
Heat #3 WADE white nba jersey Information :
[Name]: Replica Miami Heat NBA Jersey jersey
35 matches
Mail list logo
