Re: Moving profiles from XP to Win7

2010-10-26 Thread David Wilkinson

Zeb Carter wrote:

I am in the process of setting up a new computer for a friend of mine -
old computer running XP Home, new computer Win 7. Both have SM 2.0.8.


When I do this, I first close SeaMonkey on the old computer, and copy the entire 
profile folder (e.g. salt.profilename) to the new computer. Then I use the 
profile manager on the new computer to create a new profile with the same 
profile name and use Choose Folder to navigate to the copied profile.


The profile manager is smart enough to realize that it should use the existing 
profile in that location, rather than creating a new profile in that location.


--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Moving profiles from XP to Win7

2010-10-26 Thread Michael Lueck

David Wilkinson wrote:
When I do this, I first close SeaMonkey on the old computer, and copy 
the entire profile folder (e.g. salt.profilename) to the new computer. 
Then I use the profile manager on the new computer to create a new 
profile with the same profile name and use Choose Folder to navigate 
to the copied profile.


Does current SM still use the shared Mozilla Registry file? If so, then I 
assume this is the correct procedure to restore profiles from a backup, correct?

That is, do not bother backing up the shared registry file itself, simply do 
the above steps?

Thanks,

--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: From TB 2.x -- SM ???

2010-10-26 Thread WLS

Michael Lueck wrote:

Greetings-

Just today I came to the thought that since moving to TB 3.x is
undesirable, possibly moving from TB 2.x to SM would be a viable choice.
Thus some questions:

1) How does SM do as far as supporting the extensions that TB does? As
for the browser, I was able to install Ad-Block Plus into my SM profile,
and that is as far as I have gone. I mainly install SM to get the
Composer to clean up nasty HTML code and make it pretty.


What extensions do you need? Did you look for the Thunderbird extensions 
you use in SeaMonkey add-ons? Lightning works,


KompoZer is a better for HTML then Composer.


2) How portable should TB 2.x profiles be headed over to SM?


On Linux under Tools  Import you can select to import all or just 
select what you want to import from Thunderbird.


3) Any documented steps for doing the migration? I am very comfortable
working at the command line.


http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey



*) I am asking about this for use on Windows XP and also Linux via the
official Mozilla builds installed via UbuntuZilla.

TIA!



WLS
--
SeaMonkey 2.1b2pre
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Java issue

2010-10-26 Thread Tom Pamin

u...@domain.invalid wrote:
I am running SM 1.1.19 and the latest version of Java, v22 on an XP 
machine sp3.


For the last three days I keep getting 2 error messages when trying to 
either access a particular web page that utilizes Java or try to run the 
Java test at java.com.  This is an example of a web page that generates 
the error messages- http://www.bigskyresort.com/Photos-Videos/Webcam.asp


The first error message states the plug in performed an illegal 
operation, restart browser  Clicking OK then generates another 
error message, the new Java plug in requires a more recent version of 
Firefox (version 3 or higher).  The site loads at this point but the 
Java app does not activate.


This site works from IE so it does not appear to be an issue with SM.  I 
have un-installed and reinstalled both SM and Java and done an extensive 
cleaning of the registry as well as deleted Java folders with data in 
them after the uninstall.


The only thing all this accomplished was to now cause the first error 
message to pop up when I start SM.  Everything else seems fine but this 
Java thing is driving me nuts.  I do not want to update SM to v2.x due 
to the incompatibility with Roboform which I use extensively.


Any ideas?


I'm using 1.1.19, and java works fine. I did have a problem with hotmail 
not working and changed some useragent settings in about:config having 
to do with firefox. You might want to search this forum for hotmail and 
see if those changes might help you.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: email certificates

2010-10-26 Thread Ray_Net

James wrote:

Mark Hansen wrote:

On 10/25/2010 12:46 PM, James wrote:

You make it seem as if you never sent or received an encrypted email
using your method. If you had, you would know what each participant is
required to have. Still, when I have time, I will continue to research
Enigmail. So far it seems it will only work with Mozilla email client
programs.

Actually, I sent encrypted/signed message to and received from many
people. However, I don't know what they were using.

Reading the documentation makes it seem that it is a certificate creator
and manager. There is nothing that presumes the certificates will not
work anywhere a certificate is used. I do not think this will solve the
problem in sending certificate encrypted emails to Thunderbird and
receiving certificate encrypted emails from Thunderbird.

I tried again to encrypt to Thunderbird and again failed. All the other
attempts succeeded. Without a definitive answer to the SeaMonkey email
certificate problem, I must migrate back to Thunderbird.

Personally, I believe that all internet traffic should be encrypted.
Unfortunately, the majority say, I keep myself vulnerable because I
want to be abused, here is my banking information. I do not wish the
hackers to know that I am saying things like, Hello, how are you? in
the emails I send. Let them try to decrypt it to find out there is no
personal info there.


So you need to sent the public key to everyone in the world - because 
you don't know to which person the destination of the next mail will be...

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Google docs broken with latest upgrade

2010-10-26 Thread Doug Fisher
With the latest upgrade to 2.09, Google docs is now showing in basic 
HTML mode and is uneditable. SeaMonkey is being detected as a 
noncompliant browser.


This has not happened before. Nothing else had changed on my system (OSX 
10.6.4)


Doug Fisher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Java Issue Fixed

2010-10-26 Thread user
I went back to an older version of Java.  The first time it didn't work. 
 I then uninstalled Java, manually deleted it in the mozilla extensions 
folder and the sun folder in windows/programs.  I then ran Regseeker, 
rebooted and installed java 6.19 rebooted and all is back up and working 
again.

Thanks for the pointer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Java Issue Fixed

2010-10-26 Thread Jay Garcia
On 26.10.2010 12:26, u...@domain.invalid wrote:

 --- Original Message ---

 I went back to an older version of Java.  The first time it didn't work.
  I then uninstalled Java, manually deleted it in the mozilla extensions
 folder and the sun folder in windows/programs.  I then ran Regseeker,
 rebooted and installed java 6.19 rebooted and all is back up and working
 again.
 Thanks for the pointer.

What was the original problem and pointer? Thanks

-- 
*Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion*
www.ufaq.org
Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Flock - Thunderbird
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Java Issue Fixed

2010-10-26 Thread user

See my first post titled Java issues
Jay Garcia wrote:

On 26.10.2010 12:26, u...@domain.invalid wrote:

 --- Original Message ---


I went back to an older version of Java.  The first time it didn't work.
 I then uninstalled Java, manually deleted it in the mozilla extensions
folder and the sun folder in windows/programs.  I then ran Regseeker,
rebooted and installed java 6.19 rebooted and all is back up and working
again.
Thanks for the pointer.


What was the original problem and pointer? Thanks


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Java Issue Fixed

2010-10-26 Thread Jay Garcia
On 26.10.2010 14:41, u...@domain.invalid wrote:

 --- Original Message ---

 See my first post titled Java issues
 Jay Garcia wrote:
 On 26.10.2010 12:26, u...@domain.invalid wrote:

  --- Original Message ---

 I went back to an older version of Java.  The first time it didn't work.
  I then uninstalled Java, manually deleted it in the mozilla extensions
 folder and the sun folder in windows/programs.  I then ran Regseeker,
 rebooted and installed java 6.19 rebooted and all is back up and working
 again.
 Thanks for the pointer.

 What was the original problem and pointer? Thanks


Yes found it but in the future please post success replies in the main
thread, easier to follow, etc., thanks. Bottom post please.

-- 
*Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion*
www.ufaq.org
Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Flock - Thunderbird
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google docs broken with latest upgrade

2010-10-26 Thread Arnie Goetchius

Doug Fisher wrote:

With the latest upgrade to 2.09, Google docs is now showing in basic
HTML mode and is uneditable. SeaMonkey is being detected as a
noncompliant browser.

This has not happened before. Nothing else had changed on my system (OSX
10.6.4)

Doug Fisher


That has been going on since 2.01 for me (Win XP SP3) but works in 
Firefox 3.0 and up. I have complained on Google forums that they are not 
detecting the browser properly but I never had get a response.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: email certificates

2010-10-26 Thread James

Ray_Net wrote:

James wrote:

Mark Hansen wrote:

On 10/25/2010 12:46 PM, James wrote:
You make it seem as if you never sent or received an encrypted 
email using your method. If you had, you would know what each 
participant is required to have. Still, when I have time, I will 
continue to research Enigmail. So far it seems it will only work 
with Mozilla email client programs.
Actually, I sent encrypted/signed message to and received from many 
people. However, I don't know what they were using.
Reading the documentation makes it seem that it is a certificate 
creator and manager. There is nothing that presumes the certificates 
will not work anywhere a certificate is used. I do not think this 
will solve the problem in sending certificate encrypted emails to 
Thunderbird and receiving certificate encrypted emails from Thunderbird.


I tried again to encrypt to Thunderbird and again failed. All the 
other attempts succeeded. Without a definitive answer to the 
SeaMonkey email certificate problem, I must migrate back to Thunderbird.


Personally, I believe that all internet traffic should be encrypted. 
Unfortunately, the majority say, I keep myself vulnerable because I 
want to be abused, here is my banking information. I do not wish the 
hackers to know that I am saying things like, Hello, how are you? 
in the emails I send. Let them try to decrypt it to find out there is 
no personal info there.


So you need to sent the public key to everyone in the world - because 
you don't know to which person the destination of the next mail will 
be...
Is that not how Enigmail works? You trade public keys (certificates) 
then you may encrypt? I have zero experience with Enigmail, but the 
documentation suggests it is a certificate generator and certificate 
manager add-on for Mozilla email client programs.


Certificates issued by certificate authorities work to enable you to 
sign emails that can be sent to anyone, but both sender and recipient 
need each other's public keys for encryption. Trading certificates with 
an initial email and reply using signed emails is about as convenient as 
it gets before you can start sending encrypted emails.


Before secure emails, you had to encrypt a file and send it as an 
attachment. Self-extracting files were executable (.exe) and all the 
emails I tried to send with an executable file were stopped. This means 
both need the same encryption software. Trading passwords securely may 
be a problem using stand alone encryption. In my experience, the 
majority have no idea that their emails are being routinely scanned by 
hackers looking for a quick profit. I keep hearing stories about people 
sending credit card info to a family member to make a purchase and the 
credit card or bank account being raided for all it is worth by a hacker 
even before the family member can use it. I do not even like sending 
unencrypted emails that have no personal information, but convincing the 
drooling mouth breather with a mind of a gnat that encryption is good is 
as harder than teaching people to breathe under water. They argue, I 
have nothing to hide.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google docs broken with latest upgrade

2010-10-26 Thread James

Arnie Goetchius wrote:

Doug Fisher wrote:

With the latest upgrade to 2.09, Google docs is now showing in basic
HTML mode and is uneditable. SeaMonkey is being detected as a
noncompliant browser.

This has not happened before. Nothing else had changed on my system (OSX
10.6.4)

Doug Fisher


That has been going on since 2.01 for me (Win XP SP3) but works in 
Firefox 3.0 and up. I have complained on Google forums that they are 
not detecting the browser properly but I never had get a response.
Yahoo web email is the same way, but there is a link there that allows 
you to ignore the warning. Everything seems to work so I never bothered 
complaining.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Aquestion about SM 1.1 and the Internet

2010-10-26 Thread DoctorBill

I am finding more and more often, that open tabs which are loading
just keep on 'loading' forever.

That is, when I click on something to enter data, or reload, or just visit,
the circling arrow and progress bar never stop working.
I often have to clik stop to get them to stop loading and taking up
my Browser's activity.

Is that SM 1.1, the internet, of my ISP causing that to happen ?

Many sites now do this.  Others do not.

Is the reason due to high internet activity (or high activity at those 
sites),

or is my ISP not connecting well.

I do not understand all the nuances of how the internet works, so any
answer has to be written 'down' to me - me being so ignorant and such.

DoctorBill
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google docs broken with latest upgrade

2010-10-26 Thread JeffM
Doug Fisher wrote:
With the latest upgrade to 2.09,
Google docs is now showing in basic HTML mode
and is uneditable.
SeaMonkey is being detected as a noncompliant browser.

Bitch to Google loud and long
about their incompetence doing browser sniffing.
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/search?group=mozilla.support.seamonkeyq=GeckoIsGeckoqt_g=Search+this+group

http://www.rossde.com/internet/sniffing.html
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Aquestion about SM 1.1 and the Internet

2010-10-26 Thread JeffM
DoctorBill wrote:
I am finding more and more often,
that open tabs which are loading just keep on 'loading' forever.
[...] the circling arrow and progress bar never stop working.
[. . .]
I do not understand all the nuances of how the internet works,

I note that you haven't mentioned how fast your connection is.
Many Web developers ASSuME
that everyone has streaming-video-quality service
and they load up their pages with tons of useless crap.

If you aren't already running NoScript, get that and use it.
Most scripts are useless and many are malicious.
Only allow those scripts that YOU actually NEED.

Turn all Flash content into clickable links
and only click the ones you actually WANT to see.

AdBlock Plus can block other stuff that you find to be useless.

When you stop downloading useless crap, pages load faster.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Aquestion about SM 1.1 and the Internet

2010-10-26 Thread DoctorBill

JeffM wrote:

DoctorBill wrote:

I am finding more and more often,
that open tabs which are loading just keep on 'loading' forever.
[...] the circling arrow and progress bar never stop working.
[. . .]
I do not understand all the nuances of how the internet works,


I note that you haven't mentioned how fast your connection is.
Many Web developers ASSuME
that everyone has streaming-video-quality service
and they load up their pages with tons of useless crap.

If you aren't already running NoScript, get that and use it.
Most scripts are useless and many are malicious.
Only allow those scripts that YOU actually NEED.

Turn all Flash content into clickable links
and only click the ones you actually WANT to see.

AdBlock Plus can block other stuff that you find to be useless.

When you stop downloading useless crap, pages load faster.


I'm running at 256k wireless.
3.3 GHz CPU and 2 GB RAM.

Thanks for the advice - I will look into it.

DoctorBill
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Google docs broken with latest upgrade

2010-10-26 Thread d...@kd4e.com

 JeffM wrote:

Doug Fisher wrote:

With the latest upgrade to 2.09,
Google docs is now showing in basic HTML mode
and is uneditable.
SeaMonkey is being detected as a noncompliant browser.


Bitch to Google loud and long
about their incompetence doing browser sniffing.
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/search?group=mozilla.support.seamonkeyq=GeckoIsGeckoqt_g=Search+this+group
http://www.rossde.com/internet/sniffing.html


Or just condemn them to a well-deserved irrelevancy and
stop using anything associated with them.

There is little that they do that someone else does not do.

Why bother?

--

Thanks!  73, doc, KD4E
http://KD4E.com
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day
Defend free speech or lose your freedom.
I don't google I SEARCH! http://ixquick.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Any idea what might prevent this from playing?

2010-10-26 Thread d...@kd4e.com

I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8 the
other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.

http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/

WDYT?

--

Thanks!  73, doc, KD4E
http://KD4E.com
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day
Defend free speech or lose your freedom.
I don't google I SEARCH! http://ixquick.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Any idea what might prevent this from playing?

2010-10-26 Thread plonked

d...@kd4e.com wrote:

I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8 the
other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.

http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/

WDYT?


I suspect the site isn't up to scratch yet.

If you go to the main site and click through the links you get 
to the promo OK.




http://video.syfy.com/online_originals/riese/promos_trailers_23/riese-kingdom-falling/v1254658


HTH

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Any idea what might prevent this from playing?

2010-10-26 Thread Rufus

d...@kd4e.com wrote:

I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8 the
other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.

http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/

WDYT?



It's playing for me right now - SM 2.0.9 Mac - and I didn't even have to 
click anything...I just followed the link and it began playing.


--
 - Rufus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Any idea what might prevent this from playing?

2010-10-26 Thread JeffM
doc@ kd4e.com wrote:
I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8
the other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.
http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/

It would be good if folks would mention having tried the usual
suspects:
Tried user agent spoofing?
Tried IEtab?
Tried a new, clean profile?
Tried Safe Mode?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Any idea what might prevent this from playing?

2010-10-26 Thread Lance Courtland

d...@kd4e.com wrote:

I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8 the
other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.

http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/

WDYT?


Try turning off your ad-blocker.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Any idea what might prevent this from playing?

2010-10-26 Thread d...@kd4e.com

 JeffM wrote:

doc@ kd4e.com wrote:

I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8
the other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.
http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/


It would be good if folks would mention having tried the usual
suspects:
Tried user agent spoofing?
Tried IEtab?
Tried a new, clean profile?
Tried Safe Mode?


I am using Linux so #2 and #4 are not relevant.

I have no idea how the other two are either.

There is either a non-obvious block or an app not responding.

AdBlock is not on for this site.

I have explicitely permitted it in my OpenDNS filter.

--

Thanks!  73, doc, KD4E
http://KD4E.com
Have an http://ultrafidian.com day
Defend free speech or lose your freedom.
I don't google I SEARCH! http://ixquick.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Aquestion about SM 1.1 and the Internet

2010-10-26 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

DoctorBill wrote:

JeffM wrote:

DoctorBill wrote:

I am finding more and more often,
that open tabs which are loading just keep on 'loading' forever.
[...] the circling arrow and progress bar never stop working.
[. . .]
I do not understand all the nuances of how the internet works,


I note that you haven't mentioned how fast your connection is.
Many Web developers ASSuME
that everyone has streaming-video-quality service
and they load up their pages with tons of useless crap.

If you aren't already running NoScript, get that and use it.
Most scripts are useless and many are malicious.
Only allow those scripts that YOU actually NEED.

Turn all Flash content into clickable links
and only click the ones you actually WANT to see.

AdBlock Plus can block other stuff that you find to be useless.

When you stop downloading useless crap, pages load faster.


I'm running at 256k wireless.
3.3 GHz CPU and 2 GB RAM.

Thanks for the advice - I will look into it.


I have a similar experience if I try to load several sites at the same 
time -- one of them will load, but the others just keep spinning until I 
stop them. If I try again, they load fine. It's as if SeaMonkey can't 
carry on more than one conversation at a time -- or perhaps the fault 
lies with my ISP.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Any idea what might prevent this from playing?

2010-10-26 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

d...@kd4e.com wrote:


I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8 the
other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.

http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/

WDYT?


Episode 1 at top autostarts and plays fine for me, but the video 
underneath labeled Comments just shows the spinner. I didn't wait 
around to see if it would start as well -- three minutes seemed like enough.


SM 2.09.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey