Re: What about FireFox spoofing in SM 2.1 ?

Jens Hatlak wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have added with about:config as url in SM browser ... A New string: general.useragent.extra.firefox - user set - string - NOT Firefox/3.5 Should i remove this before upgrading to SM 2.1 You can do that afterward. Basically it doesn't matter since the pref

BMG MUSIC

Click Here to Enter: http://mybestonlineguide.com/2/bmg-music . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BMG MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICE BMG MUSIC CLUB BMG DIRECT MUSIC BMG MUSIC SERVICES SONY BMG MUSIC

Problem with ol

Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to find an error in my code, but I couldn't find

Re: Problem with ol

[03.11.2010 13:22] »Hana Skoumalova« wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to

Re: Problem with ol

gNeandr wrote: [03.11.2010 13:22] »Hana Skoumalova« wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text.

Re: Problem with ol

Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. It works fine for me, in several

Re: Problem with ol

Hana Skoumalova wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to find an error in my

Re: Problem with ol

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. It works

Re: Problem with ol

Hana Skoumalova wrote: The page showing the problem is at this address: http://utkl.ff.cuni.cz/~skoumal/csts-faq.html Hana Displays fine for me on Windows XP SP3 SM 2.0.10 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2pre NOT Firefox/3.5

Re: Problem with ol

Hana Skoumalova wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right

Re: Problem with ol

Le 3 novembre 2010, Beauregard T. Shagnasty a écrit : Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right

Re: Problem with ol

Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the

Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?

Hi! I know BCC and CC exists. BCC is nice but I don't want to have To not show To: undisclosed-recipients. I do want to show the name I entered. Is there a way to have SeaMonkey show the name when I send to multiple people, without showing other names and letting them know it is a BCC, from

Re: Problem with ol

Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number

Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?

Ant wrote: I know BCC and CC exists. BCC is nice but I don't want to have To not show To: undisclosed-recipients. I do want to show the name I entered. Is there a way to have SeaMonkey show the name when I send to multiple people, without showing other names and letting them know it is a

Re: Problem with ol

On 11/3/10 4:22 AM, Hana Skoumalova wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried

Re: Problem with ol

Lucas Levrel wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty a écrit : Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right

Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: The normal practice to avoid undisclosed-recipients is to place your own email address in the TO: field. Since you are sending to multiple BCC: people, are you suggesting that you want each *recipient's* name in the TO: field that /they/ see? You can't do that

Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, b ut showing To: address?

d...@kd4e.com wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: The normal practice to avoid undisclosed-recipients is to place your own email address in the TO: field. Since you are sending to multiple BCC: people, are you suggesting that you want each *recipient's* name in the TO: field that /they/

Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?

My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the ISP-level. Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients? Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one ISP at a time. Something

Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?

d...@kd4e.com wrote: Beauregard wrote: doc wrote: My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the ISP-level. Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients? Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine for almost 2 years,

Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?

Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one ISP at a time.Something wrong with their filters mishandled it and there is not a good way to get them to fix it. So .. you are getting bounces from the recipients' ISPs. Try

Re: Sending multiple e-mails to multiple people, but showing To: address?

d...@kd4e.com wrote: My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the ISP-level. Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients? Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one ISP at a

Re: filter or not filter ? That run or not...

denewton a écrit : Ed Mullen a écrit : Leonidas Jones wrote: denewtonbertranddepomm...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, I explain that in english and in french beacause that is perhaps an bug... or one fuctionality unknown... When the navigator of Seamonkey is running only (no window for the mail), if

Re: Problem with ol

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Hana Skoumalova wrote: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the

Re: Problem with ol

Hana Skoumalova wrote: This page will become a part of a larger web page, which uses XHTML, but I will try HTML to see what happens. Still no joy. Hana ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

I want to upgrade to 2.0xxx

I’m on a stable SM 1.1.18 for the Mac now. Is there a recommended way to go directly to the latest v.2.0.10? Or, must I DO it in stages? What should I remove first, if anything? Many thanks, keith whaley Mac OS 10.6.4 ___ support-seamonkey mailing

Re: Problem with ol

Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:22:10 +0100, /Hana Skoumalova/: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text. I tried to

Re: Problem with ol

Lucas Levrel wrote: Le 3 novembre 2010, Hana Skoumalova a écrit : I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right into the text.

Re: Problem with ol

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:22:10 +0100, /Hana Skoumalova/: I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed to the right

Re: Problem with ol

On 11/3/10 7:42 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 11/3/10 4:22 AM, Hana Skoumalova wrote: Hello, I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed

Re: Problem with ol

David E. Ross wrote: In any case, get rid of the /p, /li, /dd, and /dt tags. They are not needed. Their presence makes your page look like tag soup. I agree with the rest of what you wrote, except for the above. All elements should be closed, having an opening tag and a closing tag. If you

Re: I want to upgrade to 2.0xxx

Keith Whaley wrote: I’m on a stable SM 1.1.18 for the Mac now. Is there a recommended way to go directly to the latest v.2.0.10? Or, must I DO it in stages? What should I remove first, if anything? My approach will be: (i am under windowsXP) 1. Stop SM. 2. Copy somewhere the 1.1.18 profile

Update to the problem Re: Moving profiles from XP to Win7

Zeb Carter wrote: I am in the process of setting up a new computer for a friend of mine - old computer running XP Home, new computer Win 7. Both have SM 2.0.8. I have created duplicate named profiles on the win 7 machine to match the XP machine. Working from a cloned copy of the XP drive, I

Re: Problem with ol

On 11/3/10 2:26 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David E. Ross wrote: In any case, get rid of the /p, /li, /dd, and /dt tags. They are not needed. Their presence makes your page look like tag soup. I agree with the rest of what you wrote, except for the above. All elements should be

Re: I want to upgrade to 2.0xxx

Ray_Net wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: I’m on a stable SM 1.1.18 for the Mac now. Is there a recommended way to go directly to the latest v.2.0.10? Or, must I DO it in stages? What should I remove first, if anything? My approach will be: (i am under windowsXP) 1. Stop SM. 2. Copy somewhere

Re: Problem with ol

David E. Ross wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David E. Ross wrote: In any case, get rid of the /p, /li, /dd, and /dt tags. They are not needed. Their presence makes your page look like tag soup. I agree with the rest of what you wrote, except for the above. All elements should be