Re: AAAAAARGGG Again-Seamonkey 2 Deleted/removed itself??
BJD wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 15.12.2010 18:27, BJD wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 15.12.2010 17:42, BJD wrote: --- Original Message --- Ok, this is too much. Seamonkey 2 seems to have Deleted/removed itself?? In a previous post (12/6/10), I had just upgraded to Seamonkey version 2 and lost all but one of my profiles (S.Beaulieu was kind enough to post info on how to recover my other profiles. Last night, 12/14/10, I clicked on the Seamonkey desktop icon and nothing happened: I got a message saying that seamonkey.exe is not a valid application??? Thinking it was a 'congested computer problem',I rebooted -now the Seamonkey Icon was blank- and got the same result when I clicked on it. I followed the desktop shortcut found the seamonkey.exe file was 0 bytes! (see: http://pages.sbcglobal.net/bjweiss/SMfolder.jpg ) What's going on. How could Seamonkey get uninstalled or corrupted? Did it try and automatically upgrade itself? Can I recover from this or do I need to try a new install? Thanks in advance for any insight on this. ...Brian Interesting, are you running an AV application that may think it was a virus and removed the .exe file or rendered it useless? I have Symantec AV which does a small scan on reboot and maybe monitors email. (I'm not at my home computer right now so I'm not sure of the edition or settings). I also have Malwarebytes SUPERAntiSpyware (both are free versions, that have to be initiated manually). ...Brian I have the Pro version of SAS and I removed the trial of MWB but I've never had anything like this happen at any time. Thanks for the info. After checking my home laptop, I have Symantec AV Corporate Edition (ver 10). I checked the logs, etc. -- nothing in Quarantine, etc. (set to do a Quick Scan on computer Startup. SAS MWB: SAS last scan activity, November, 2010. MWB: Last activity, March, 2010. So I don't think any of these programs are the culprit. Fortunately, I still have Seamonkey version 1.1.9 on two other computers, so I still can extract some of the saved emails profile/newsgroup info. I'm hesitant to go ahead and do a new re-install of seamonkey 2 on this (WindowsXT,SP3) laptop at this point in time (of which I have none! I'm supposed to be doing Xmas online shopping but I'm having ATT-DSL problems at the same time, which I've been putting off dealing with -Just keep re-booting the Modem to get an new IP ... temproarily fixes the problem. Also, even to post to this group I have to VPN RDP to my work desktop (after rebooting the DSL modem one or more times...). Sorry for the rant... I've been using seamonkey because of the multiple profile feature (I started with Netscape Communicator, years ago...) ...Brian -- I have not had any recent problems, but I keep a copy of the Mozilla (Now Seamonkey) files from the programs directory. I just copy the whole thing to the D drive. Also the Seamonkey files from Documents Settings. Then if Seamonkey goes tits up I just re-install then copy the backup files over the new install files. I also do regular backups to a separate USB hard drive with Acronis. Call this belt and suspenders. -- Gerald Ross Cochran, GA I've got places to go... People to annoy. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PLEASE ID the operating system in Subject line ?
Is it possible that we can all return to identifying the OS we are using SeaMonkey on, perhaps in the Subject line ? It would assist both the user and others that can assist or comment if that was known right in the Subject line...something like: Subject: [Win] [Linux] [] [subject text] Perhaps exemplified... Subject: Linux It chases cats out of the room Even though the message body might EVENTUALLY give some hint as to what OS we are discussing or having a trouble with, why make all users HAVE to read deeply every message just to find out ? Just an outburst of potential common sense... Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: AAAAAARGGG Again-Seamonkey 2 Deleted/removed itself??
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:20, Gerald Ross g...@comsouth.net wrote: BJD wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 15.12.2010 18:27, BJD wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 15.12.2010 17:42, BJD wrote: --- Original Message --- Ok, this is too much. Seamonkey 2 seems to have Deleted/removed itself?? In a previous post (12/6/10), I had just upgraded to Seamonkey version 2 and lost all but one of my profiles (S.Beaulieu was kind enough to post info on how to recover my other profiles. Last night, 12/14/10, I clicked on the Seamonkey desktop icon and nothing happened: I got a message saying that seamonkey.exe is not a valid application??? Thinking it was a 'congested computer problem',I rebooted -now the Seamonkey Icon was blank- and got the same result when I clicked on it. I followed the desktop shortcut found the seamonkey.exe file was 0 bytes! (see: http://pages.sbcglobal.net/bjweiss/SMfolder.jpg ) What's going on. How could Seamonkey get uninstalled or corrupted? Did it try and automatically upgrade itself? Can I recover from this or do I need to try a new install? Thanks in advance for any insight on this. ...Brian Interesting, are you running an AV application that may think it was a virus and removed the .exe file or rendered it useless? I have Symantec AV which does a small scan on reboot and maybe monitors email. (I'm not at my home computer right now so I'm not sure of the edition or settings). I also have Malwarebytes SUPERAntiSpyware (both are free versions, that have to be initiated manually). ...Brian I have the Pro version of SAS and I removed the trial of MWB but I've never had anything like this happen at any time. Thanks for the info. After checking my home laptop, I have Symantec AV Corporate Edition (ver 10). I checked the logs, etc. -- nothing in Quarantine, etc. (set to do a Quick Scan on computer Startup. SAS MWB: SAS last scan activity, November, 2010. MWB: Last activity, March, 2010. So I don't think any of these programs are the culprit. Fortunately, I still have Seamonkey version 1.1.9 on two other computers, so I still can extract some of the saved emails profile/newsgroup info. I'm hesitant to go ahead and do a new re-install of seamonkey 2 on this (WindowsXT,SP3) laptop at this point in time (of which I have none! I'm supposed to be doing Xmas online shopping but I'm having ATT-DSL problems at the same time, which I've been putting off dealing with -Just keep re-booting the Modem to get an new IP ... temproarily fixes the problem. Also, even to post to this group I have to VPN RDP to my work desktop (after rebooting the DSL modem one or more times...). Sorry for the rant... I've been using seamonkey because of the multiple profile feature (I started with Netscape Communicator, years ago...) ...Brian -- I have not had any recent problems, but I keep a copy of the Mozilla (Now Seamonkey) files from the programs directory. I just copy the whole thing to the D drive. Also the Seamonkey files from Documents Settings. Then if Seamonkey goes tits up I just re-install then copy the backup files over the new install files. I also do regular backups to a separate USB hard drive with Acronis. Call this belt and suspenders. -- Gerald Ross Cochran, GA I've got places to go... People to annoy. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey Looking at the image that you have made it seems that you have backup files of everything in that folder. There is a file called seamonkey.exe.moz-backup. Just a guess, but copy everything out of that folder and then copy and rename all files ending moz-backup to their original names, that might bring you back Seamonkey, but in anycase try see what has caused that, since I do not believe it is in any way normal behaviour. It seems that there has been other cases like your see the link below: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2906910 -- Heikki Jussila freelance researcher and geographer - support-seamonkey mailing list - support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org - https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PLEASE ID the operating system in Subject line ?
Is it possible that we can all return to identifying the OS we are using SeaMonkey on, perhaps in the Subject line ? It would assist both the user and others that can assist or comment if that was known right in the Subject line...something like: Subject: [Win] [Linux] [] [subject text] Perhaps exemplified... Subject: Linux SM chases cats out of the room Even though the message body might EVENTUALLY give some hint as to what OS we are discussing or having a trouble with, why make all users HAVE to read deeply every message just to find out ? Just an outburst of potential common sense... Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
PLEASE ID the operating system in Subject line ?
Is it possible that we can all return to identifying the OS we are using SeaMonkey on, perhaps in the Subject line ? It would assist both the user and others that can assist or comment if that was known right in the Subject line...something like: Subject: [Win] [Linux] [] [subject text] Perhaps exemplified... Subject: Linux It chases cats out of the room Even though the message body might EVENTUALLY give some hint as to what OS we are discussing or having a trouble with, and even though the problem MIGHT also exist in other OS versions of SM, why make all users HAVE to read deeply every message just to find out ? Hopefully, just an outburst of potential common sense... Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: AAAAAARGGG Again-Seamonkey 2 Deleted/removed itself??
BJD wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 15.12.2010 18:27, BJD wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 15.12.2010 17:42, BJD wrote: --- Original Message --- Ok, this is too much. Seamonkey 2 seems to have Deleted/removed itself?? In a previous post (12/6/10), I had just upgraded to Seamonkey version 2 and lost all but one of my profiles (S.Beaulieu was kind enough to post info on how to recover my other profiles. Last night, 12/14/10, I clicked on the Seamonkey desktop icon and nothing happened: I got a message saying that seamonkey.exe is not a valid application??? Thinking it was a 'congested computer problem',I rebooted -now the Seamonkey Icon was blank- and got the same result when I clicked on it. I followed the desktop shortcut found the seamonkey.exe file was 0 bytes! (see: http://pages.sbcglobal.net/bjweiss/SMfolder.jpg ) What's going on. How could Seamonkey get uninstalled or corrupted? Did it try and automatically upgrade itself? Can I recover from this or do I need to try a new install? Thanks in advance for any insight on this. ...Brian Interesting, are you running an AV application that may think it was a virus and removed the .exe file or rendered it useless? I have Symantec AV which does a small scan on reboot and maybe monitors email. (I'm not at my home computer right now so I'm not sure of the edition or settings). I also have Malwarebytes SUPERAntiSpyware (both are free versions, that have to be initiated manually). ...Brian I have the Pro version of SAS and I removed the trial of MWB but I've never had anything like this happen at any time. Thanks for the info. After checking my home laptop, I have Symantec AV Corporate Edition (ver 10). I checked the logs, etc. -- nothing in Quarantine, etc. (set to do a Quick Scan on computer Startup. SAS MWB: SAS last scan activity, November, 2010. MWB: Last activity, March, 2010. So I don't think any of these programs are the culprit. Fortunately, I still have Seamonkey version 1.1.9 on two other computers, so I still can extract some of the saved emails profile/newsgroup info. I'm hesitant to go ahead and do a new re-install of seamonkey 2 on this (WindowsXT,SP3) laptop at this point in time (of which I have none! I'm supposed to be doing Xmas online shopping but I'm having ATT-DSL problems at the same time, Sometimes downloading a file is doing: 1. put a 0 length of the original file. 2. download the new file in another location. 3. Copy the new file over the 0 bytes- file. 4. Remove the new file in another location. It could be that the auto-update do step 1, step 2... but in the middle of the step 2 ...your ATT-DSL problems stop the process... leaving your seamonkey.exe empty. BTW, i go in Edit-Preferences-Advanced-Software Installation and there i reset *all* options. Note that a complete install of SM put some option true evenwhile not set before :-( Another thing, (nothing to do with your problem) i do is that i reset the Enable Internet E-mail Auto-Protect configure option in Symantec Anti-virus, to avoid a never-ending loop i got when downloding mails. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PLEASE ID the operating system in Subject line ?
On 12/16/10 5:23 AM, Joe Rotello wrote: Is it possible that we can all return to identifying the OS we are using SeaMonkey on, perhaps in the Subject line ? It would assist both the user and others that can assist or comment if that was known right in the Subject line...something like: Subject: [Win] [Linux] [] [subject text] Perhaps exemplified... Subject: Linux It chases cats out of the room Even though the message body might EVENTUALLY give some hint as to what OS we are discussing or having a trouble with, and even though the problem MIGHT also exist in other OS versions of SM, why make all users HAVE to read deeply every message just to find out ? Hopefully, just an outburst of potential common sense... Joe Yet I had to read each of your three messages to see if anything different appeared. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Page Icons
Almost all of my Web pages contain the following in the head section: link rel=shortcut icon href=DR.ICO type=image/x-icon link rel=icon href=DR.ICO type=image/x-icon These provide for an icon appearing in the SeaMonkey address area and an icon appended to anyone else's bookmark for the page. When I log headers via LiveHTTPheaders, why don't I see a log entry for the icon? When does SeaMonkey fetch the icon from the Web server? -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Page Icons
David E. Ross wrote: Almost all of my Web pages contain the following in thehead section: link rel=shortcut icon href=DR.ICO type=image/x-icon link rel=icon href=DR.ICO type=image/x-icon These provide for an icon appearing in the SeaMonkey address area and an icon appended to anyone else's bookmark for the page. When I log headers via LiveHTTPheaders, why don't I see a log entry for the icon? When does SeaMonkey fetch the icon from the Web server? When the cache says it's expired. Just like with any other external file (image, JS, CSS, ...). Expiration depends on the HTTP headers that are part of the initial response, which depend on the issuing server and perhaps the software/code used (e.g. in case of PHP), and the clocks of both the server and yours. Whether it's still in the cache depends on your cache size and the cache retention policy (like first-in-first-out or least-recently-used). Whether the cache is used depends on your settings. I would guess that using Shift+Reload bypasses all parts of cache usage, including this one. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Sporadic problem sending messages. Alert window Sending Messages remains open.
64 bit Windows 7 with SM 2.0.11 connected via DSL to ATT. It seems to have started after the 2.0.11 update. I have a POP mail account with Yahoo (where ever ATT sold us to) and an IMAP account at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. I have now had this happen on both accounts. Sending a message will put up a Sending Messages - With subject of the message alert box. Inside the box is a line labeled Status: delivering message or Status: Copy ... , a Progress: bar, and a Cancel button. - The alert gets to Status: Copy complete with the Progress: bar filling completely and indicating 100% But the alert window doesn't terminate, i.e. close. Checking the Sent folder shows the message is there, seemingly complete. Sending a test message to myself, seemingly has sent the message, because It appears in server INbox, and I can download it as a new message. But the Sending Messages ... alert hangs around until I X close or Cancel it! Anyone else experiencing this behaviour? What is likely causing the problem? and of more interest, HOW do I repair the problem cause? How do I determine that the message has in fact been sent completely and successfully? -- Rostyk ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sporadic problem sending messages. Alert window Sending Messages remains open.
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: (...) Sending a message will put up a Sending Messages - With subject of the message alert box. Inside the box is a line labeled Status: delivering message or Status: Copy ... , a Progress: bar, and a Cancel button. - The alert gets to Status: Copy complete with the Progress: bar filling completely and indicating 100% But the alert window doesn't terminate, i.e. close. (...) Anyone else experiencing this behaviour? Looks like this report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557007 What is likely causing the problem? and of more interest, HOW do I repair the problem cause? It needs to be fixed in the application. I'd guess there's no workaround. How do I determine that the message has in fact been sent completely and successfully? Tough call. In Thunderbird the Activity Manager might show it, but SeaMonkey doesn't have that (yet). I'd assume (but haven't checked) that the message is only saved in the Sent folder if the actual sending was successful. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PLEASE ID the operating system in Subject line ?
Joe Rotello wrote: Is it possible that we can all return to identifying the OS we are using SeaMonkey on, perhaps in the Subject line ? It would assist both the user and others that can assist or comment if that was known right in the Subject line...something like: Subject: [Win] [Linux] [] [subject text] Perhaps exemplified... Subject: Linux It chases cats out of the room Even though the message body might EVENTUALLY give some hint as to what OS we are discussing or having a trouble with, and even though the problem MIGHT also exist in other OS versions of SM, why make all users HAVE to read deeply every message just to find out ? Hopefully, just an outburst of potential common sense... I would think that most people that come here for help are people that have not needed help before. Unless a majority of the posts are formatted how you suggest, no one will figure it out prior to posting. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.11 Security Update
Bret Busby wrote: It is above all a question of workforce. I understand there are few people in the SM team. There may be no-one using Debian among them. Is there no person who uses Debian, in the Seamonkey Project? Or, at Mozilla.org, in the development project areas? I for one use Debian on my laptop, but testing/unstable, and not the distribution-provided packages for Mozilla software (SM/TB/FF), but releases and nightlies from ftp.mozilla.org, all installed somewhere below my home directory so I can use the automatic update mechanism. I don't know about others. E.g. KaiRo is using OpenSuSE AFAIK. Greetings, Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PLEASE ID the operating system in Subject line ?
Le 16/12/2010, Joe Rotello a supposé : Is it possible that we can all return to identifying the OS we are using SeaMonkey on, perhaps in the Subject line ? It would assist both the user and others that can assist or comment if that was known right in the Subject line...something like: Subject: [Win] [Linux] [] [subject text] Perhaps exemplified... Subject: Linux It chases cats out of the room Even though the message body might EVENTUALLY give some hint as to what OS we are discussing or having a trouble with, and even though the problem MIGHT also exist in other OS versions of SM, why make all users HAVE to read deeply every message just to find out ? Hopefully, just an outburst of potential common sense... Joe Is it also possible that people don't post three (or more) times the same message. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Copies of PLEASE IS the system...
On 12/16/2010 3:00 PM, support-seamonkey-requ...@lists.mozilla.org wrote: Yet I had to read each of your three messages to see if anything different appeared. -- David E. Ross Apologies for the extra copies. Almost time it's more to laugh...the Email kept reporting that lists.mozilla.org server kept bouncing the Email back. Didn't TELL me that the first two * actually * made it through, only that they were refused, or so the feedback made it seem. Anyway, in my insanity defense, I tried it the trusty third time, and it worked. Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: AAAAAARGGG Again-Seamonkey 2 Deleted/removed itself??
Ray_Net wrote: Sometimes downloading a file is doing: 1. put a 0 length of the original file. 2. download the new file in another location. 3. Copy the new file over the 0 bytes- file. 4. Remove the new file in another location. It could be that the auto-update do step 1, step 2... but in the middle of the step 2 ...your ATT-DSL problems stop the process... leaving your seamonkey.exe empty. If that's what the developers are doing, it's irresponsible and unsafe. The right way to do this is to download the entire installer and then run it locally. I can imagine a local power outage causing the installer to fail in mid-update, but I can't imagine the developers are so stupid as to do what you describe. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sporadic problem sending messages. Alert window Sending Messages remains open.
Jens Hatlak wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: (...) Sending a message will put up a Sending Messages - With subject of the message alert box. Inside the box is a line labeled Status: delivering message or Status: Copy ... , a Progress: bar, and a Cancel button. - The alert gets to Status: Copy complete with the Progress: bar filling completely and indicating 100% But the alert window doesn't terminate, i.e. close. (...) Anyone else experiencing this behaviour? Looks like this report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557007 Evenwhike the problem *is* reproductible ...there is still Vote numbers = *0* - So this bug will never be solved/corrected nor worked on. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PLEASE ID the operating system in Subject line ?
Joe Rotello wrote: Is it possible that we can all return to identifying the OS we are using SeaMonkey on, perhaps in the Subject line ? It would assist both the user and others that can assist or comment if that was known right in the Subject line...something like: Subject: [Win] [Linux] [] [subject text] Perhaps exemplified... Subject: Linux It chases cats out of the room Even though the message body might EVENTUALLY give some hint as to what OS we are discussing or having a trouble with, and even though the problem MIGHT also exist in other OS versions of SM, why make all users HAVE to read deeply every message just to find out ? Hopefully, just an outburst of potential common sense... Joe The common sense thing to do is replace the Header notation of the OS sending the original post and all threads to that post. We used to have that notation in earlier versions of SM. Michael ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sporadic problem sending messages. Alert window Sending Messages remains open.
Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: (...) Sending a message will put up a Sending Messages - With subject of the message alert box. Inside the box is a line labeled Status: delivering message or Status: Copy ... , a Progress: bar, and a Cancel button. - The alert gets to Status: Copy complete with the Progress: bar filling completely and indicating 100% But the alert window doesn't terminate, i.e. close. (...) Anyone else experiencing this behaviour? Looks like this report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557007 Evenwhike the problem *is* reproductible ...there is still Vote numbers = *0* - So this bug will never be solved/corrected nor worked on. We're supposed to VOTE on these bugs? This bug is merely annoying, once you realize that the message has actually gotten sent. I see it 8 - 10 times in my average week. But it's a REAL problem to people who haven't yet figured out that it's actually harmless ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sporadic problem sending messages. Alert window Sending Messages remains open.
Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Looks like this report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557007 Evenwhike the problem *is* reproductible ...there is still Vote numbers = *0* - So this bug will never be solved/corrected nor worked on. Actually, the number of votes doesn't really influence which bugs developers work on. Really important criteria (for actual bugs, excluding enhancements) are: Major feature broken, regression, data loss, security issue, ... that sort of things. In this case the bug is about MailNews, which means that there's a chance that it's also in Thunderbird which raises the chance that someone will work on it eventually. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sporadic problem sending messages. Alert window Sending Messages remains open.
Bill Spikowski wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: (...) Sending a message will put up a Sending Messages - With subject of the message alert box. Inside the box is a line labeled Status: delivering message or Status: Copy ... , a Progress: bar, and a Cancel button. - The alert gets to Status: Copy complete with the Progress: bar filling completely and indicating 100% But the alert window doesn't terminate, i.e. close. (...) Anyone else experiencing this behaviour? Looks like this report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557007 Evenwhike the problem *is* reproductible ...there is still Vote numbers = *0* - So this bug will never be solved/corrected nor worked on. We're supposed to VOTE on these bugs? This bug is merely annoying, once you realize that the message has actually gotten sent. I see it 8 - 10 times in my average week. But it's a REAL problem to people who haven't yet figured out that it's actually harmless To Jens: It looks like 557007, But: Those occurrences appear to be on an Apple Macintosh system. Mine are on 64 bit Windows 7 ultimate. So are people encountering it on various systems? One of my occurrences was with 3 attachments ~40k + ~40k + 2010k, and the copy progress bar got stuck at ~57%. So I don't know if the file was sent. The other was a small ~4k text file which appeared to have been sent (copy progress bar went to 100%, complete mess. in sent folder) Repeated tests sending to myself in both cases sent successfully. To Bill: But how does one know if the send did complete successfully in cases other than sending a CC to oneself and retrieving your copy of the mail from the remote mailbox? -- Rostyk ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Page Icons
On 12/16/10 7:48 AM, David E. Ross wrote: Almost all of my Web pages contain the following in the head section: link rel=shortcut icon href=DR.ICO type=image/x-icon link rel=icon href=DR.ICO type=image/x-icon These provide for an icon appearing in the SeaMonkey address area and an icon appended to anyone else's bookmark for the page. When I log headers via LiveHTTPheaders, why don't I see a log entry for the icon? When does SeaMonkey fetch the icon from the Web server? It appears that no logging occurs when a media object (e.g., an icon) is fetched from the local cache. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Location-Aware Browsing
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101123 SeaMonkey/2.0.11 I just did a search in Google for Supercuts. At the top of the list was a map of the area where I live, showing the location of the nearest Supercuts store to my house. I have the preference variable geo.enabled set to false. I have no cookies set for Supercuts. The only cookie I have for Google resulted from my setting my search preferences; in those preferences, I left my location blank. Why does it appear that I'm still getting location-aware browsing? -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?
Jane_Galt wrote: Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote : Jordon wrote: Jane_Galt wrote: Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots. Webshots doesn't like people that believe Glenn Beck tells the truth. anything at Fox news is suspect. Elect progressive candidates for every office - for jobs, security, democracy, and peace, vote Communist! - Progress and Democracy for Rhode Island., 1938 Jane, I objected to a post Chris made in response to one of your OT posts, but, really, this sort of lengthy diatribe does not belong here. Please put it in mozilla.general on this same server. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ DUMBWAITER: One who asks if the kids would care to order dessert. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PLEASE ID the operating system in Subject line ?
Joe Rotello wrote: Is it possible that we can all return to identifying the OS we are using SeaMonkey on, perhaps in the Subject line ? Not a bad idea at all, Joe. Can't tell how many times I've offered advice only to find the OP says something like: Thanks, but that doesn't apply to my OS. To which I reply something like: Well, if you'd have said so in the first place instead of forcing me to do a view source and try and figure that out ... BTW, don't hold your breath. :-D -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Location-Aware Browsing
David E. Ross wrote: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101123 SeaMonkey/2.0.11 I just did a search in Google for Supercuts. At the top of the list was a map of the area where I live, showing the location of the nearest Supercuts store to my house. I have the preference variable geo.enabled set to false. I have no cookies set for Supercuts. The only cookie I have for Google resulted from my setting my search preferences; in those preferences, I left my location blank. Why does it appear that I'm still getting location-aware browsing? Your address is broadcast to who ever you connect to (and more). Currently its: 76.173.11.77 IP Information - 76.173.11.77 Host name cpe-76-173-11-77.socal.res.rr.com Country United States United States Country CodeUS Region California CityAgoura Hills Postal Code 91301 Latitude34.1267 Longitude -118.7648 Area Code 818 DMA Code803 Also, make sure you clean your flash cookies because every flash site you have visited is stored on your computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
