David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/25/11 6:13 AM, Larry wrote:
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of users.
Why isn't anyone working on
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at
all.
No question SeaMonkey is loosing users because of this, lots of
users.
Why isn't
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:27:47 +0200, Philipp van Hüllen wrote:
Robert Gault schrieb:
The subject pretty much says it all but just to avoid confusion, I want
the acceptable entries as search terms in the browser, about:xx .
What/where is the list of all legal xx
Henry wrote:
It's time for Seamonkey to just do security and stability releases like
IE8 does instead of having to update new versions all the time. It's
confusing and scary. I'm still back at Mozilla 1.78 for my email and
newsgroups and use IE8 for my browser because after following this group
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/25/11 10:19 AM, Larry wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/25/11 6:13 AM, Larry wrote:
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is visble at all.
No question
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is
visble at all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users
because of this, lots of
Sometime late yesterday I became unable to send mail from most of my
accounts in seamonkey. The issue persists today. I get the following
error message,
An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded: From
address not verified - see
NoOp wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is
visble at all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users
because of this,
NoOp wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:43 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/24/11 9:59 AM, Sandy wrote:
Otto Wyss wrote:
This has been mentioned several times yet no progress is
visble at all. No question SeaMonkey is loosing users
because of this,
Well, not always, but several times a day SeaMonkey 2.4.1 will just hang
(and not recover) immediately after a download.
I've never seen this with previous versions.
Bob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Sorry, I accidentally posted this as a reply to another thread, bad form
on my part. Obviously, I am able to post in a newsgroup, so that
functionality is not affected by the problem,
LMH
LMH wrote:
Sometime late yesterday I became unable to send mail from most of my
accounts in seamonkey.
WLS wrote:
76 lines of regurgitated context, followed by
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Is it really, Really, REALLY necessary to recirculate 76 lines
of previously circulated correspondence, nested to a depth of
eight levels, simply in order to adduce this one simple fact ?
Do
LMH a écrit :
An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded: From
address not verified - see
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/original/manage/sendfrom-07.html.
Please verify that your email address is correct in your Mail
preferences and try again.
I've encountered
S. Beaulieu a écrit :
Trouble is, they now require that all emails originating from a Yahoo
email address go out through a connection using the same email address.
I forgot to add that that's exactly why you can still send mail from
your admin address: it matches the SMTP.
S.
WLS wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
I'll now install 2.5.3 check the difference.
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Ummm 2.5b3:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111012
Firefox/8.0 SeaMonkey/2.5
___
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
WLS wrote:
76 lines of regurgitated context, followed by
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Is it really, Really, REALLY necessary to recirculate 76 lines
of previously circulated correspondence, nested to a depth of
eight levels, simply in
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
WLS wrote:
76 lines of regurgitated context, followed by
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Is it really, Really, REALLY necessary to recirculate 76 lines
of previously circulated correspondence, nested to a depth of
eight levels, simply in
NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions
with the powers to be here (read that as the list mom) over me
requesting others trim etc. (Archives).
Hard to imagine how
On 10/26/2011 1:55 PM NoOp submitted the following:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
WLS wrote:
76 lines of regurgitated context, followed by
There is a 2.5.3, or do you mean 2.5b3?
Is it really, Really, REALLY necessary to recirculate 76 lines
of previously circulated
On 10/26/2011 11:05 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions
with the powers to be here (read that as the list mom)
NoOp wrote:
Please don't send me direct email, or cc me on your replies - unless of
course you purposely intend to take this discussion off group/list. I
read the newsgroup just fine don't need additional copies. Thanks.
Since I /did/ send it to you (you being NoOp, despite this
reply
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Since I /did/ send it to you (you being NoOp, despite this
reply being sent to the list), and did /not/ send it to the list,
it would seem reasonable for you to infer that I /did/ intend to take
the discussion off list.
Apologies, on checking my sent
Thanks for the info, I was able to fix the issue using your
instructions. If I had seen the dropdown where you associate an email
with an outgoing SMTP server, I may have figured this out earlier. I
actually tried entering a matching SMTP username, but I didn't know that
I needed to associate
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Re: SeaMonkey is loosing users -- that would be losing g, loosing means
un-tightening.
No, that's loosening; loosing is the action of
releasing something, as in to loose the dogs of war.
Philip Taylor (who sees
On 10/26/2011 11:45 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Since I /did/ send it to you (you being NoOp, despite this
reply being sent to the list), and did /not/ send it to the list,
it would seem reasonable for you to infer that I /did/
LMH wrote:
... The tech actually told me to delete the account and re-create it
to see if that would help. DELETE MY BUSINESS EMAIL ACCOUNT!!! Why
does he think I use an email client instead of web mail in the first
place? Maybe because my email is the most important thing I need for
my
I took 1 st a href=http://goodfinance-blog.com;loans/a when I was 32 and
this aided my family very much. However, I need the sba loan also.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Interviewed by CNN on 26/10/2011 15:53, S. Beaulieu told the world:
So, basically, the solution is to add a separate SMTP server for each of
your addresses in Seamonkey, making sure to link each address to its
proper SMTP.
Actually, I never understood the reasoning behind making the SMTP
On 10/26/2011 02:25 PM, HammondRosa22 wrote:
spam
http://www.projecthoneypot.org/ip_91.212.226.143
Blocking/filtering 91.212.226. on news.mozilla.org will help clear this up.
Do we get giganews to do this, or can a moderator do it?
___
support-seamonkey
NoOp:
Blocking/filtering 91.212.226. on news.mozilla.org will help clear this up.
Do we get giganews to do this, or can a moderator do it?
Yesterday i have set up a filter for this. Works. :)
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fi111027.png (18 KB)
Hartmut
On 10/26/2011 04:39 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
Blocking/filtering 91.212.226. on news.mozilla.org will help clear this up.
Do we get giganews to do this, or can a moderator do it?
Yesterday i have set up a filter for this. Works. :)
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fi111027.png (18
NoOp:
I filter using the entire server (news.mozilla.org) for 91.212.226.
and that does indeed work.
I am using this rule:
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fi111027-b.png (16 KB)
Time will tell if modifications are needed. For a very long time i have
not used Filter Log and now observed,
According to my analysis, billions of people on our planet get the a
href=http://goodfinance-blog.com;loan/a at various creditors. Thence,
there's a good possibility to find a consolidation loan in any country.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On 10/26/2011 05:17 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
I filter using the entire server (news.mozilla.org) for 91.212.226.
and that does indeed work.
I am using this rule:
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/fi111027-b.png (16 KB)
You'd be better served by filtering on:
UserIpAddress:
NoOp:
On 10/26/2011 05:17 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
For a very long time i have not used Filter Log and now observed,
that this log will only be updated after a restart of SM. Bug.
The log should be constantly updated, regardless of restart.
So it should be, but is not. I have asked for
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions with
the powers to be here (read that as the list mom) over me requesting
others trim etc. (Archives).
Do
On 11-10-26 7:03 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 10/26/2011 02:25 PM, HammondRosa22 wrote:
spam
http://www.projecthoneypot.org/ip_91.212.226.143
Blocking/filtering 91.212.226. on news.mozilla.org will help clear this up.
Do we get giganews to do this, or can a moderator do it?
I can remove them after the
On 11-10-25 6:10 PM, Luke Bolt wrote:
I have stopped using firefox 7.0.1 in ubuntu 11.10 it locks
up(slows to a crawl is more accurate but same frustration) after a few
minutes. I have no problems running the latest google chrome
browser. I am on an older p4 2.0 system with 2 gig of ram.
BeeJ presented the following explanation :
Before I waste my time with SeaMonkey, has anyone set up multiple NewsGroups
on SeaMonkey?
Does it all play correctly?
I tried with Thunderbird (latest download) on Win7Pro 64 and it mangled
everything newsgroup related.
I loaded one newsgroup
On 10/26/2011 06:00 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions with
the powers to be here (read that as the list mom) over
On 11-10-26 9:21 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 10/26/2011 06:00 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty nasty discussions with
the powers to be here
On 10/26/2011 07:56 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-10-26 9:21 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 10/26/2011 06:00 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-10-26 1:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Well... I usually snip/trim according to:
http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html
But in the past I've gotten into some pretty
I have no real interest in cloud hosting, I much prefer a plain old
basic server with a plain old basic backup. Is there a more traditional
outfit out there that folks have had good success with.
LMH
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
LMH wrote:
... The tech actually told me to delete the account
I have no real interest in cloud hosting, I much prefer a plain old
basic server with a plain old basic backup. Is there a more traditional
outfit out there that folks have had good success with.
LMH
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
LMH wrote:
... The tech actually told me to delete the account
This setup makes a bit more sense in some ways, but it was never an
issue before yesterday. You used the same outgoing SMTP server for all
of your accounts, as long as the address was from the same domain. I
guess yahoo decided to change that without telling anyone. Now that
every email
46 matches
Mail list logo
