Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/mastectomy-option-treating-breast-cancer-article-1.1513829 Content Encoding Error The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Hartmut Figge
Paul B. Gallagher: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/mastectomy-option-treating-breast-cancer-article-1.1513829 Content Encoding Error WFM in SM 2.25a1. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Jim Taylor
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/mastectomy-option-treating-breast-cancer-article-1.1513829 Content Encoding Error The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Connie wrote: On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? Displays OK in Palemoon and my elderly version of SM. I'll have to set up my test machine to see if I get the same problems as others are experiencing with the newer

Re: does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?

2013-11-12 Thread Trane Francks
On 11/12/13 2:25 PM +0900, Dennis wrote: Dennis wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 11/12/13 8:10 AM +0900, goodwin wrote: On 11/11/2013 09:54 AM, HilsB wrote: HilsB wrote: Yes it does - if anything a little faster. A few bits of advice - 1) backup everything 2)Close down all programmes 3)

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Trane Francks
On 11/12/13 7:05 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/mastectomy-option-treating-breast-cancer-article-1.1513829 Content Encoding Error The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it

Re: does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?

2013-11-12 Thread WaltS
On 11/12/2013 12:25 AM, Dennis wrote: Dennis wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 11/12/13 8:10 AM +0900, goodwin wrote: On 11/11/2013 09:54 AM, HilsB wrote: HilsB wrote: Yes it does - if anything a little faster. A few bits of advice - 1) backup everything 2)Close down all programmes 3) allow a

Re: does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?

2013-11-12 Thread Geoff Welsh
Trane Francks wrote: On 11/12/13 2:25 PM +0900, Dennis wrote: Dennis wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 11/12/13 8:10 AM +0900, goodwin wrote: On 11/11/2013 09:54 AM, HilsB wrote: HilsB wrote: Yes it does - if anything a little faster. A few bits of advice - 1) backup everything 2)Close down

Create message filter from Subject: field ?

2013-11-12 Thread Philip Taylor
If, say, I want to auto-delete all further messages with the subject containing does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?, there appears to be no short-cut way to achieve this. I can click on a From: field and filter by sender, but not on a Subject: field and filter by subject. Oversight, or am I

Re: Create message filter from Subject: field ?

2013-11-12 Thread WaltS
Philip Taylor wrote: If, say, I want to auto-delete all further messages with the subject containing does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?, there appears to be no short-cut way to achieve this. I can click on a From: field and filter by sender, but not on a Subject: field and filter by

Re: Create message filter from Subject: field ?

2013-11-12 Thread Philip Taylor
WaltS wrote: Click on the From in the filter creation dialog box. If, following your suggestion, I click on the option selector corresponding to From in the filter creation dialogue box and change the selection criterion to Subject, the contents of the data field remain set to the contents of

Re: Create message filter from Subject: field ?

2013-11-12 Thread JAS
Philip Taylor wrote: If, say, I want to auto-delete all further messages with the subject containing does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?, there appears to be no short-cut way to achieve this. I can click on a From: field and filter by sender, but not on a Subject: field and filter by

Re: Create message filter from Subject: field ?

2013-11-12 Thread WaltS
Philip Taylor wrote: WaltS wrote: Click on the From in the filter creation dialog box. If, following your suggestion, I click on the option selector corresponding to From in the filter creation dialogue box and change the selection criterion to Subject, the contents of the data field

Re: Wierd Task Bar presentation

2013-11-12 Thread regz91
Daniel wrote: regz91 wrote: Daniel wrote: No, I like the taskbar previews, but I want to go back to just one for the browser, no matter how many tabs I have open in the browser, not a preview for each tab that I have open. Or are you suggesting that by changing that pref, I will only have

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
WaltS wrote: On 11/12/2013 12:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Connie wrote: On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? Displays OK in Palemoon and my elderly version of SM. I'll have to set up my

Re: does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?

2013-11-12 Thread PhillipJones
WaltS wrote: On 11/11/2013 09:11 PM, PhillipJones wrote: goodwin wrote: On 11/11/2013 09:54 AM, HilsB wrote: HilsB wrote: Yes it does - if anything a little faster. A few bits of advice - 1) backup everything 2)Close down all programmes 3) allow a few hours. academic question only - what

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread hawker
On 11/12/2013 1:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: WaltS wrote: On 11/12/2013 12:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Connie wrote: On 12/11/2013 10:05, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: IE displays this page fine, SM refuses. Any workaround? Displays OK in Palemoon and my

Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2013-11-12 Thread brian . masinick
I am currently using the following Seamonkey Nightly Build: You are currently on the nightly update channel. See a list of contributors to the Mozilla Project. Read the licensing information for this product. Read the release notes for this version. See the build configuration used for this

Re: Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2013-11-12 Thread Philip Taylor
I don't pretend to understand the Seamonkey release programme at all, but browsing : http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/ seems to shew a lot of things more recent than September 19th. Are, perhaps, any of the things shewn the thing(s) for which you are seeking ?

Re: Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2013-11-12 Thread Philip Taylor
Well, I did say I did not pretend to understand the Seamonkey release programme, but in addition the only mention of a specific need for a Linux version was in the User-Agent string that you cited : User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24a1

Re: Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2013-11-12 Thread brian . masinick
Sorry, I mentioned Linux systems in the title; neither x86 nor xa64 builds have been functional in the 2.24a1 and 2.25a1 nightly builds since September 19. I hope that someone can take a look, let us know what's wrong and whether we can expect to have nightly builds for Linux systems once

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
hawker wrote: On 11/12/2013 1:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have ABP 2.4, about:addons says Ads were yesterday! Double-checked custom filters, nothing relevant. My initial testing included clearing private data before reloading; spec includes cache and cookies (everything but browsing

Re: Invalid or unsupported form of compression?

2013-11-12 Thread hawker
On 11/12/2013 5:07 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: hawker wrote: On 11/12/2013 1:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have ABP 2.4, about:addons says Ads were yesterday! Double-checked custom filters, nothing relevant. My initial testing included clearing private data before reloading; spec

Re: Please explain why Seamonkey Nightly is no longer building for Linux systems

2013-11-12 Thread Jens Hatlak
brian.masin...@gmail.com wrote: Build identifier: 20130919003001 This build works very well, but it has also been static since September 19. I also notice that Aurora builds for all platforms ceased updates after October 28. Are there build issues, lack of resources, or what? AFAIK the

Re: does SM 2.22 work on OS X Mavericks?

2013-11-12 Thread Trane Francks
On 11/13/13 8:27 AM +0900, Dennis wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 11/12/13 2:25 PM +0900, Dennis wrote: Dennis wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 11/12/13 8:10 AM +0900, goodwin wrote: On 11/11/2013 09:54 AM, HilsB wrote: HilsB wrote: Yes it does - if anything a little faster. A few bits of

Just Discovered the M key for email

2013-11-12 Thread Erness Wild
This is great, press M key on any message and it becomes bold or regular text. Nice. -- Takes more than talk to get things done. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Just Discovered the M key for email

2013-11-12 Thread Rufus
Erness Wild wrote: This is great, press M key on any message and it becomes bold or regular text. Nice. Toggles Mark as Read - there's a menu item for the key command under Message-Mark. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Just Discovered the M key for email

2013-11-12 Thread regz91
Erness Wild wrote: This is great, press M key on any message and it becomes bold or regular text. Nice. To see list of shortcuts for mail component press F1== will open a help window == navigate to SeaMonkey Keyboard Shortcuts on the left pane == Mail Newsgroups Shortcuts -- GNOME 3.6.2