Re: adblock ?

On 2021-02-01 04:07, rjkrjk wrote: some websites I visit seem to indicate  Im suing some version of Adblock and want me to update it, and allow me to continue I check my Ad On Manger, there are no pgms installed Some sites mistakenly interpret various forms of tracking protection as ad

Re: Does the Acrobat DC plug in no longer work in SM 2.53? Other broken helper apps

On 2020-05-25 21:09, Hawker wrote: Since updating to SM 2.53 I'm having "helper app" issues. The most annoying is that PDFs no longer open in the browser. Going to the helper app, I set it to open in SM or always ask but it stays on always ask. I seem to remember reading this this version was

Re: No empty master password allowed in FIPS Software Security Device

On 2020-03-14 20:40, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: - There doesn't seem to be any problem setting a master password in 2.53.1 once the profile has been converted.  Having done so, I assume it is actually encrypting the saved passwords (though it would

Re: Is there a way to know which extensions may break when upgrading?

On 2020-03-08 04:43, Daniel wrote: If "I mostly use SeaMonkey for email and newsgroups" why not use Thunderbird in place of SeaMonkey?? That would save using resources on the unused Browser portion of SM! Eventually that will probably be necessary, but as long as SeaMonkey works, there's

Re: Is there a way to know which extensions may break when upgrading?

On 2020-03-06 18:09, Ant wrote: You could share what extensions you have and we can tell you. Here's mine: The most important ones for me are: * JunQuilla 1.0.4 * Adblock Plus 2.9.1 (which the 2.53.1 release notes say is problematic, but someone else in this thread is also using) *

Is there a way to know which extensions may break when upgrading?

There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that work in 2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been posting here. I can't say I'm surprised, given that the developers have to try to maintain compatibility with an obsolete extension system while grafting in

Re: No empty master password allowed in FIPS Software Security Device

On 2020-03-05 15:17, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Check the password manager in the upgraded install. At least until recently this didn't work. I tested only on Windows and left the new password blank e.g no chars entered. This worked fine for me. Can a master password be set after the

Re: Secure Connection Failed

On 2019-10-14 02:43, Ray_Net wrote: An error occurred during a connection to www.seamonkey-project.org. The OCSP server experienced an internal error. I've seen that error before, though only very infrequently. I'm inclined to believe that it's exactly what the message says - a problem on

Re: All extensions allegedly broken under Firefox

On 2019-05-04 13:39, David E. Ross wrote: SeaMonkey does not require extensions to be signed, at least in the current end-user release 2.49.4. Which is largely a moot point since there have been few if any updates to most of these extensions for SeaMonkey's obsolete extension system for

Re: Should the size of the memory cache be a setting in preferences?

On 2019-02-25 13:01, Dirk Munk wrote: For many people the browser is their primary application, so making it run as smoothly as possible is quite a logical pursuit. Frankly, if a user's concern is having a browser that runs as smoothly as possible, SeaMonkey is not the right browser.

Re: Should the size of the memory cache be a setting in preferences?

On 2019-02-25 08:09, Dirk Munk wrote: However, there's also a memory cache in RAM, and the size of that cache can only be changed by tweaking the configuration file. I've noticed that increasing the memory cache can certainly increase the speed of Seamonkey, and can also avoid freezing

Re: "Updating everyone…" --SeaMonkey Project Blog on 12/19/2018...

On 2018-12-24 20:02, Ray_Net wrote: I totally agree with you, but do you think that a group of volunteers will be able to take this big step? It doesn't sound promising, does it? But then again, I thought something similar when SeaMonkey 1.x kept dragging on with nothing but

Re: "Updating everyone…" --SeaMonkey Project Blog on 12/19/2018...

On 2018-12-23 19:04, Nuno Silva wrote: On 2018-12-22, user@domain.invalid wrote: [...] Because without an up to date engine Seamonkey will not be able to appeal to new users and long time users will slowly move on as well. I.e. in my optinion Seamonkey would not have a future without an

Re: "Updating everyone…" --SeaMonkey Project Blog on 12/19/2018...

On 2018-12-18 20:13, Ant wrote: https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2018/12/19/updating-everyone/ Thank you to everyone who has been working on this project. I understand that it's a huge task and the pay sucks :-) and I really do appreciate it. For what it's worth, here's my opinion on

Re: 32bit & 64bit SM questions.

On 2018-10-22 04:49, Daniel wrote: FRG, I've seen "l10n builds", and the problems with it, mentioned for years. *What is it* ?? A Real World language?? A Programming language?? What?? An abbreviation of localization. The 10 stands for the ten letters left out between the l and the n.

Re: Wishlist of things I'd like to see

On 2018-06-25 00:04, Daniel wrote: Steve, did you close the Browser or did you close SeaMonkey totally?? I totally closed Seamonkey. Anyway, since one of the developers has since posted that this preference has never done anything in the browser, now we know why it didn't work :-)

Re: Wishlist of things I'd like to see

On 2018-06-24 05:24, Daniel wrote: sean wrote on 24/06/2018 7:49 AM: browser.tabs.closeButtons;3 Sean according to http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_entries#Browser. you want that set to 1 Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to work, at least in 2.49.3; I set it to 1, closed the

Re: Disabling SSL/TLS protocols to safeguard payment data

On 2018-06-09 10:57, Richard Owlett wrote: On 06/09/2018 09:29 AM, Steve Dunn wrote: On 2018-06-08 15:02, Andy K wrote: In about:config, set security.tls.version.min to 2 to prevent protocols lower than TLS 1.1 from being used.  This is fine if you only use the browser to access sites

Re: Disabling SSL/TLS protocols to safeguard payment data

On 2018-06-08 15:02, Andy K wrote: June 30, 2018 is the deadline for disabling SSL/early TLS and implementing a more secure encryption protocol – TLS 1.1 or higher (TLS v1.2 is strongly encouraged) in order to meet the PCI Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) for safeguarding payment data. [...]

Re: SeaMonkey version 2.49.3 Browser won't load Google and youtube sites

On 2018-05-22 07:04, dirk wrote: I recently installed SeaMonkey version 2.49.3, but thr browser won't load Google and youtube sites, saying it is not safe It works for me. When you look at the certificates, what's wrong with them? Wrong site? Wrong validity date(s)? Are you, by any

Re: SM 2.493 user name/passwords not remembered any longer

On 2018-05-17 09:07, rjkrjk wrote: win7/64  6gb system updated SM last night to 2.493 situation signing in to ebay typically I right click and the several accts that I have show up NONE show up now there seems to be a disconnect between the user names/passwords previously used with SM 2.49

Re: Change User Agent for one domain only

On 2018-03-07 12:13, Hawker wrote: I am currently using User Agent Switcher. I've never used that extension so I can't help you with it. But it's not the only way to fiddle with the user agent string. What I mostly want to do is have all Google domain use default to the current FireFox UA

Re: A question regarding junk mail

On 2017-12-13 18:48, Zeb Carter wrote: I receive email from pensacon.com (sci fi convention is Pensacola, FL). Seamonkey thinks it's a scam or junk mail even though I do have the address in my addressbook (newslet...@pensacon.com). How do I get SM to stop flagging it? I hit the ignore warning

Re: SeaMonkey 2.49.1 (Windows) freezes

On 2017-12-02 21:03, NoOp wrote: Have anyone else had SM 2.49.1 (Windows) freeze on them? I haven't had this problem. Like you, I'm using the same profile I've been using for years. Unlike you, I haven't used any pre-release (alpha, beta, dev, whatever) versions and then gone back down

Re: There's a "video war" going on, and we users are the victims

On 2017-08-22 10:20, null wrote: WaltS48 wrote: Do you have HTML5 support? What is checked there? Using SM, The page asks the question "What does this browser support?" The following boxes are ticked : HTMLVideoElement Media Source Extensions WebM VP8 MSE &

Re: No more plugin check?

On 2017-08-03 04:17, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: doesn't check plugins anymore, just promotes Firefox. Firefox removed the link to that page on their about:plugins page a few versions ago. I'm not surprised if this page no longer works properly

Re: How to disable HTML5 auto play?

On 2017-08-02 08:45, Ray_Net wrote: I had under 2.46 disbabled the auto-play .. AND the result is : When I try to start the video ... NOWAY ! the video would not start - never I have the same experience. If autoplay is disabled, at least some videos will not start even when you click

Re: adblocker in Seamonkey automatically

On 2017-07-27 09:33, Gerd Schweizer wrote: Is ist possible, that there is an automatic Adblocker in Seamonkey 1.46? Why i ask is: There is a way to get Navi updates from the server of an automobile firm. Their Website tells me, the download is finished even though nothing has happened. No,

Re: Facebook Login

On 2017-07-14 11:09, Tom Pamin wrote: All of a sudden, I have to login to Facebook with SM 2.46 every time I turn on my PC or laptop. Never had to before - I was already logged in. Any ideas? Did you change your cookie permissions? I'd expect that Facebook, like other sites, stores a big

Re: WYSIWYG printing?

On 2017-03-05 01:02, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Many website nowadays have their own "Print" buttons that deliver what the designers consider "printer-friendly" versions of their pages. But even if I ignore those and use SeaMonkey's own "Print" function, many sites outsmart me by serving their

Re: Security warning - want to turn it off.

On 2017-02-22 09:56, JAS wrote: Should a person have TLS 1.0 checked or not? In an ideal world, off, as TLS 1.0 has known security problems. In the real world, though, you'll probably find that you can't connect to some sites if this is off; there are still some older Web servers

Re: Security warning - want to turn it off.

On 2017-02-22 02:02, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: I happens when I enter a zip code in the location box at: https://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=hgx=N0R=yes It's exactly what the warning message says it is: anything you enter in this form gets sent back to the server unencrypted. Here,

Re: SSL_ERROR_NO_CYPHER_OVERLAP on videosift.com web site

On 2017-01-26 03:12, Ant wrote: As you guys know, both Gecko based web browsers are the (lat/new)est stable versions which I told them. "Can't they be made to also support modern protocols?" is what they asked. So, I am asking you guys on how to resolve/fix this security connection issue.