Re: Status of SeaMonkey

»Q« wrote: In , Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Another oddity is that the Xref: header line for the above article is Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com mozilla.support.seamonkey:37378 As I wrote. My SM 1.1.14 reports 37227 articles in the group.

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote: Hi, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj a tapoté, le 04.03.2009 21:18: My SM 1.1.14 reports 37227 articles in the group. My Seamonkey 2.0a3 say exactly the same and certainly 37228 when this message will be posted. The first message i have is on 10.01.2006 0

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Stéphane Grégoire wrote: Hi, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj a tapoté, le 04.03.2009 21:18: My SM 1.1.14 reports 37227 articles in the group. My Seamonkey 2.0a3 say exactly the same and certainly 37228 when this message will be posted. The first message i have is on 10.01.2006 07:04. and Xref: number1.n

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Chris Ilias wrote: On 3/4/09 11:39 AM, _Seymour Wolfson_ spoke thusly: Someone told me that SeaMonkey is no longer being maintained. Is there any truth to that? No. They may have been thinking of the Mozilla Application Suite no longer being maintained by the Mozilla Foundation, which was cod

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

In , Stéphane Grégoire wrote: > The first message i have is on 10.01.2006 07:04. > and Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com mozilla.support.seamonkey:2 > > The first message on a newsgroup may be the message which create it. Yes, that is the case

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

In , Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: > Another oddity is that the Xref: header line for the above article is > Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com mozilla.support.seamonkey:37378 > As I wrote. My SM 1.1.14 reports 37227 articles in the group. $ date -

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: NoOp wrote: ... snip ,,, I recommend that you use the newsreader vs list to participate. That way you can easily review threads & posts from over a year ago. Subcribe to: news.mozilla.org This group: mozilla.support.seamonkey Dev

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Hi, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj a tapoté, le 04.03.2009 21:18: My SM 1.1.14 reports 37227 articles in the group. My Seamonkey 2.0a3 say exactly the same and certainly 37228 when this message will be posted. The first message i have is on 10.01.2006 07:04. and Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com mozil

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:06:12 -0800, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: My mozilla.support.seamonkey newsgroup only contains 37,371 messages at this time! I've only got 232 I think you mean 37,232 Now up to

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Keith Whaley wrote: NoOp wrote: ... snip ,,, I recommend that you use the newsreader vs list to participate. That way you can easily review threads & posts from over a year ago. Subcribe to: news.mozilla.org This group: mozilla.support.seamonkey Development: mozilla.dev.apps.

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:06:12 -0800, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: My mozilla.support.seamonkey newsgroup only contains 37,371 messages at this time! I've only got 232 I think you mean 37,232 Now up to 37,234 Phil no, I mean I only have

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:06:12 -0800, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: > Keith Whaley wrote: >> My mozilla.support.seamonkey newsgroup only contains 37,371 messages at >> this time! > I've only got 232 I think you mean 37,232 Now up to 37,234 Phil -- Philip Chee , http://flashblock.mozd

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Keith Whaley wrote: My mozilla.support.seamonkey newsgroup only contains 37,371 messages at this time! I've only got 232 -- *IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email help Emails to me may become public Notice: This posting is protected under the Free Speech Laws, which appl

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

NoOp wrote: On 03/04/2009 09:16 AM, Seymour Wolfson wrote: At 11:56 AM -0500 3/4/09, chicagofan wrote: Seymour Wolfson wrote: Someone told me that SeaMonkey is no longer being maintained. Is there any truth to that? If you read Robert Kaiser's post of just yesterday March 3, you will see

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

On 03/04/2009 09:16 AM, Seymour Wolfson wrote: > At 11:56 AM -0500 3/4/09, chicagofan wrote: >>Seymour Wolfson wrote: >>> Someone told me that SeaMonkey is no longer being maintained. >>> Is there any truth to that? >> >>If you read Robert Kaiser's post of just yesterday March 3, you will >>see

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Seymour Wolfson wrote: At 11:56 AM -0500 3/4/09, chicagofan wrote: Seymour Wolfson wrote: Someone told me that SeaMonkey is no longer being maintained. Is there any truth to that? If you read Robert Kaiser's post of just yesterday March 3, you will see that is not true. bj

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

At 11:56 AM -0500 3/4/09, chicagofan wrote: Seymour Wolfson wrote: Someone told me that SeaMonkey is no longer being maintained. Is there any truth to that? If you read Robert Kaiser's post of just yesterday March 3, you will see that is not true. bj === Since I just joine

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

On 3/4/09 11:39 AM, _Seymour Wolfson_ spoke thusly: Someone told me that SeaMonkey is no longer being maintained. Is there any truth to that? No. They may have been thinking of the Mozilla Application Suite no longer being maintained by the Mozilla Foundation, which was codenamed "seamonkey"

Re: Status of SeaMonkey

Seymour Wolfson wrote: Someone told me that SeaMonkey is no longer being maintained. Is there any truth to that? If you read Robert Kaiser's post of just yesterday March 3, you will see that is not true. bj ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support