Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-08 Thread JeffM
NoOp wrote:
Most WinXP apps run just fine in Win2K - but I never
could get Silverlight to run (think the threads regarding Olympics...)
on Win2K.

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
I know that this isn't what you want to hear but, . . .
anything that runs on xp
should have no problems running on win2k
seeing as though win2k is what xp is built on.
http://club.cdfreaks.com/f3/how-run-xp-only-app-under-windows-2000-a-139888/

...unless M$ chooses to break things for backwards-compatibility.
(Silverlight is a M$ format
and can be expected to work only on M$'s *currently-supported* OSes)
http://google.com/search?q=cache:u9rayVTRzj0J:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silverlight+Moonlight+inc+inc+inc+*-2000+*-XP+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-antitrust-*-*-*-*-*-*#Compatibility
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-08 Thread Benoit Renard

Jim S wrote:

Why are you/they faffing about with 1.1.anything when 2.0a2 actually works
better?


I don't know about you, but I don't like my suite to eat my e-mail. 
Basically, it's not stable.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj

--(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws

Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses
six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch
is a critical JavaScript flaw affecting Firefox's layout engine;
it could be exploited to crash the browser and possibly run malicious
code.
The vulnerability also affects the Thunderbird email client and
SeaMonkey Internet Suite.
Other vulnerabilities include cross-site scripting and a problem
with tab restoration that could be exploited to steal local files.

Internet Storm Center:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5800
http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/901
http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Firefox-3-0-6-fixes-vulnerabilities--/news/112555
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,100189,39610692,00.htm
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-01.html
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html#firefox3.0.6
--
Rostyk
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread Daniel

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

--(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws

Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses
six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch
is a critical JavaScript flaw affecting Firefox's layout engine;
it could be exploited to crash the browser and possibly run malicious
code.
The vulnerability also affects the Thunderbird email client and
SeaMonkey Internet Suite.
Other vulnerabilities include cross-site scripting and a problem
with tab restoration that could be exploited to steal local files.

Internet Storm Center:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5800
http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/901
http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Firefox-3-0-6-fixes-vulnerabilities--/news/112555 


http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,100189,39610692,00.htm
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-01.html
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html#firefox3.0.6 



In my thread about replying whilst off-line using SM, NoOp has said that 
he tested it using SM 1.1.15pre (and it did suffer from the problem!! SM 
2.0a3 is o.k. though), so I'm guessing this means, Yes, we are about to 
have SM 1.1.15


Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 2/7/2009 7:01 PM, Daniel typed the following:
 Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
 --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws

 Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses
 six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch
 is a critical JavaScript flaw affecting Firefox's layout engine;
 it could be exploited to crash the browser and possibly run malicious
 code.
 The vulnerability also affects the Thunderbird email client and
 SeaMonkey Internet Suite.
 Other vulnerabilities include cross-site scripting and a problem
 with tab restoration that could be exploited to steal local files.

 Internet Storm Center:
 http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5800
 http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/901
 http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Firefox-3-0-6-fixes-vulnerabilities--/news/112555

 http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,100189,39610692,00.htm
 http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-01.html
 http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html#firefox3.0.6

 
 In my thread about replying whilst off-line using SM, NoOp has said that
 he tested it using SM 1.1.15pre (and it did suffer from the problem!! SM
 2.0a3 is o.k. though), so I'm guessing this means, Yes, we are about to
 have SM 1.1.15
 
 Daniel

I don't see a 1.1.15 on the nightlies.

Ed
-- 
All mail is checked by avast! Antivirus
Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

If crime fighters fight crime and fire fighters
fight fire, what do freedom fighters fight?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread Jim S
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:05:23 -0500, BeeNeR wrote:

 On or about 2/7/2009 7:01 PM, Daniel typed the following:
 Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
 --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws

 Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses
 six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch
 is a critical JavaScript flaw affecting Firefox's layout engine;
 it could be exploited to crash the browser and possibly run malicious
 code.
 The vulnerability also affects the Thunderbird email client and
 SeaMonkey Internet Suite.
 Other vulnerabilities include cross-site scripting and a problem
 with tab restoration that could be exploited to steal local files.

 Internet Storm Center:
 http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5800
 http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/901
 http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Firefox-3-0-6-fixes-vulnerabilities--/news/112555

 http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,100189,39610692,00.htm
 http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-01.html
 http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html#firefox3.0.6

 
 In my thread about replying whilst off-line using SM, NoOp has said that
 he tested it using SM 1.1.15pre (and it did suffer from the problem!! SM
 2.0a3 is o.k. though), so I'm guessing this means, Yes, we are about to
 have SM 1.1.15
 
 Daniel
 
 I don't see a 1.1.15 on the nightlies.
 
 Ed

Why are you/they faffing about with 1.1.anything when 2.0a2 actually works
better? 
Well for me it does.
-- 
Jim S
Tyneside UK
 www.jimscott.co.uk
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj

Jim S wrote:

On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:05:23 -0500, BeeNeR wrote:


On or about 2/7/2009 7:01 PM, Daniel typed the following:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

--(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws

Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses
six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch
is a critical JavaScript flaw affecting Firefox's layout engine;
it could be exploited to crash the browser and possibly run malicious
code.
The vulnerability also affects the Thunderbird email client and
SeaMonkey Internet Suite.
Other vulnerabilities include cross-site scripting and a problem
with tab restoration that could be exploited to steal local files.

Internet Storm Center:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5800
http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/901
http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Firefox-3-0-6-fixes-vulnerabilities--/news/112555

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,100189,39610692,00.htm
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-01.html
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html#firefox3.0.6


In my thread about replying whilst off-line using SM, NoOp has said that
he tested it using SM 1.1.15pre (and it did suffer from the problem!! SM
2.0a3 is o.k. though), so I'm guessing this means, Yes, we are about to
have SM 1.1.15

Daniel

I don't see a 1.1.15 on the nightlies.

Ed


Why are you/they faffing about with 1.1.anything when 2.0a2 actually works
better? 
Well for me it does.


Because I'm using Win98se and 2.xxx is promised not to work with Win98!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread NoOp
On 02/07/2009 05:05 PM, BeeNeR wrote:

 
 I don't see a 1.1.15 on the nightlies.
 
 Ed

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/?C=M;O=D
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-mozilla1.8/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread BeeNeR
On or about 2/7/2009 9:45 PM, NoOp typed the following:
 On 02/07/2009 05:05 PM, BeeNeR wrote:
 
 I don't see a 1.1.15 on the nightlies.

 Ed
 
 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/?C=M;O=D
 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-mozilla1.8/

Guess I should have been clearer.  I don't see any candidates-1.1.15/
on the nightlies.

Ed
-- 
All mail is checked by avast! Antivirus
Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

The human body is the best picture of the human soul.
  –Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:


Because I'm using Win98se and 2.xxx is promised not to work with Win98!


have you checked out this?:


Didn't know about this. But now I have filed the references,
and will check it out. Probably when SM2.x comes out.


http://x86.neostrada.pl/KernelEx/
http://www.msfn.org/board/KernelEx-v035-released-t71476.html

They claim that using this kernel will allow you to run XP programs on 
win98



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread NoOp
On 02/07/2009 06:47 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
 Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
 
 Because I'm using Win98se and 2.xxx is promised not to work with Win98!
 
 have you checked out this?:
 
 http://x86.neostrada.pl/KernelEx/
 http://www.msfn.org/board/KernelEx-v035-released-t71476.html
 
 They claim that using this kernel will allow you to run 
 XP programs on win98
 

[we are now OT, but I have to ask] Know of one that will do the same
with Win2KPro? Most WinXP apps run just fine in Win2K - but I never
could get Silverlight to run (think the threads regarding Olympics...)
on Win2K.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:01:17 +1100, Daniel wrote:
 Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
 --(February 4, 2009) Firefox Update Fixes Six Flaws
 
 Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox that addresses
 six vulnerabilities in the browser. The most serious of the batch
 is a critical JavaScript flaw affecting Firefox's layout engine;
 it could be exploited to crash the browser and possibly run malicious
 code.
 The vulnerability also affects the Thunderbird email client and
 SeaMonkey Internet Suite.
 Other vulnerabilities include cross-site scripting and a problem
 with tab restoration that could be exploited to steal local files.
 
 Internet Storm Center:
 http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5800
 http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/901
 http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Firefox-3-0-6-fixes-vulnerabilities--/news/112555
  
 
 http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,100189,39610692,00.htm
 http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-01.html
 http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html#firefox3.0.6
  

 In my thread about replying whilst off-line using SM, NoOp has said that 
 he tested it using SM 1.1.15pre (and it did suffer from the problem!! SM 
 2.0a3 is o.k. though), so I'm guessing this means, Yes, we are about to 
 have SM 1.1.15

We are waiting for the relevant patches to land on the 1.8.1 branch. I
think that there is one remaining that bz gave an r- so that patch will
have to be re-worked.

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
[ ]Member: International Brotherhood of Tagline Thieves!
* TagZilla 0.066.6

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Does this mean we're about to have SM 1.1.15?

2009-02-07 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo

NoOp wrote:

On 02/07/2009 06:47 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:


Because I'm using Win98se and 2.xxx is promised not to work with Win98!

have you checked out this?:

http://x86.neostrada.pl/KernelEx/
http://www.msfn.org/board/KernelEx-v035-released-t71476.html

They claim that using this kernel will allow you to run 
XP programs on win98




[we are now OT, but I have to ask] Know of one that will do the same
with Win2KPro? Most WinXP apps run just fine in Win2K - but I never
could get Silverlight to run (think the threads regarding Olympics...)
on Win2K.


I know that this isn't what you want to hear but, . . . 
anything that runs on xp should have no problems 
running on win2k seeing as though win2k is what xp is 
built on. 
http://club.cdfreaks.com/f3/how-run-xp-only-app-under-windows-2000-a-139888/


Otherwise, I have no idea.  Perhaps you should post 
something on some sort of windows forum.  There's many.


--
*IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email 
help Emails to me may become public


Notice: This posting is protected under the Free Speech 
Laws, which applies everywhere in the FREE world, 
except for some strange reason, not to the mozilla.org 
newsgroup servers, where your posting may get you banned.


Peter Potamus  His Magic Flying Balloon:
http://melaman2.com/cartoons/singles/mp3/p-potamus.mp3
http://www.toonopedia.com/potamus.htm
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey