>NoOp wrote:
>>Most WinXP apps run just fine in Win2K - but I never
>>could get Silverlight to run (think the threads regarding Olympics...)
>>on Win2K.
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>I know that this isn't what you want to hear but, . . .
>"anything that runs on xp
>"should" have no problems running on win2k
>seeing as though win2k is what xp is built on."
...unless M$ chooses to break things for backwards-compatibility.
(Silverlight is a M$ format
and can be expected to work only on M$'s *currently-supported* OSes)
support-seamonkey mailing list

Reply via email to