Re: Progress Window Mockups

Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb: On 3/17/2010 12:16 PM, Martin F. wrote: Here you are: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552970 regards Thanks, and as promised patch is already written, just has to now run its course. Awesome, thanks. :-) Martin __

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Lance Courtland wrote: Martin F. wrote: Jens Hatlak schrieb: Martin F. wrote: btw: I'd suggest to open the menus by right-clicking. Left click (or at least left double-click) should open the file when (double)clicking on the file-name or the downloadpage when (double)clicking the download-loc

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Lance Courtland wrote: > Martin F. wrote: >> Jens Hatlak schrieb: >>> Basically I agree that the open/launch action should be triggered by a >>> double click, though. I'd just go another way by providing a visual >>> representation of the finished download through the system icon matching >>> the d

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Lance Courtland schrieb: What's a "twistie"? http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/3135/twisty.jpg ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Progress Window Mockups

On 3/17/2010 12:16 PM, Martin F. wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb: On 3/11/2010 6:16 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Martin F. wrote: Ah yeah, it doesn't seem to remember it's last coordinates/position, but always starts centered on the next download, "that sucks" ;-P I put it to a corner a dozen ti

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Martin F. wrote: Jens Hatlak schrieb: Martin F. wrote: btw: I'd suggest to open the menus by right-clicking. Left click (or at least left double-click) should open the file when (double)clicking on the file-name or the downloadpage when (double)clicking the download-location. After that the wi

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Jens Hatlak schrieb: Martin F. wrote: btw: I'd suggest to open the menus by right-clicking. Left click (or at least left double-click) should open the file when (double)clicking on the file-name or the downloadpage when (double)clicking the download-location. After that the window should close

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb: On 3/11/2010 6:16 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Martin F. wrote: Ah yeah, it doesn't seem to remember it's last coordinates/position, but always starts centered on the next download, "that sucks" ;-P I put it to a corner a dozen times a day because of that on every new do

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Martin F. wrote: Does that link there: indicate that scaling was implemented? For one thing, this was a proposal that wasn't accepted into the code in the end, for the other, we don't support scaling of any icons anywhere right

Re: Progress Window Mockups

On 3/11/2010 6:16 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Martin F. wrote: Ah yeah, it doesn't seem to remember it's last coordinates/position, but always starts centered on the next download, "that sucks" ;-P I put it to a corner a dozen times a day because of that on every new download. (regression to SM1.1.x

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Martin F. wrote: > Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb: > >> http://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/DLProgress_Redesign > > Does that link there: > > indicate that scaling was implemented? >

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb: > http://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/DLProgress_Redesign Does that link there: indicate that scaling was implemented? Or is it just bigger buttons

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: To summarize the two options: * Use one that KaiRo already submitted, which is/was partially implemented and a few vocally opposed. * DO NOT CHANGE A THING ABOUT HOW IT WAS IN SM 1.1 Choice 2 is woefully not go

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: To summarize the two options: * Use one that KaiRo already submitted, which is/was partially implemented and a few vocally opposed. * DO NOT CHANGE A THING ABOUT HOW IT WAS IN SM 1.1 Choice 2 is woefully not going to happen,

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: To summarize the two options: * Use one that KaiRo already submitted, which is/was partially implemented and a few vocally opposed. * DO NOT CHANGE A THING ABOUT HOW IT WAS IN SM 1.1 Choice 2 is woefully not going to happen, sorry. especially as

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: To summarize the two options: * Use one that KaiRo already submitted, which is/was partially implemented and a few vocally opposed. * DO NOT CHANGE A THING ABOUT HOW IT WAS IN SM 1.1 Choice 2 is woefully not going to happen, sorry. especially as there was no explan

Re: Progress Window Mockups

I have to admit, I actually expected more than two replies "as proposals" and at least ONE unique proposal. To summarize the two options: * Use one that KaiRo already submitted, which is/was partially implemented and a few vocally opposed. * DO NOT CHANGE A THING ABOUT HOW IT WAS IN SM 1.1 C

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have c

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, t

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop energ

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Dean Scott wrote: Ah HAA! So THAT's where the old "launch or run" button that appeared after download completed hid itself! I was so missing that feature. Yes, I understand the need for "security" for the more naive in not presenting them with a big, fat "run" button out in the open like it was

Re: Progress Window Mockups

On 2/26/2010 11:58 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandone

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Benoit Renard wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop energy" when he tried to ma

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop energy" when he tried to make improvements.

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Ah HAA! So THAT's where the old "launch or run" button that appeared after download completed hid itself! I was so missing that feature. Yes, I understand the need for "security" for the more naive in not presenting them with a big, fat "run" button out in the open like it was previously, BUT

Re: Progress Window Mockups

On 2/25/2010 9:52 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 2/25/2010 8:42 PM, Rufus wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, th

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 2/25/2010 8:42 PM, Rufus wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned

Re: Progress Window Mockups

On 2/25/2010 8:42 PM, Rufus wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop energy" when

Re: Progress Window Mockups

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop energy" when he tried to make improvements.

Re: Progress Window Mockups

On 2/25/2010 1:23 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop energy" when he tried to ma

Progress Window Mockups

Ok Here is the deal: A vocal minority of people who USE the progress windows don't like them as they stand. These people wish to have changes made. KaiRo, the original owner of this area has abandoned it due to "stop energy" when he tried to make improvements. *I* Am willing to pickup work