Phillip Jones wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/23/2010 4:55 AM, Daniel wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now,
and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/23/2010 4:55 AM, Daniel wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB
Daniel wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/23/2010 4:55 AM, Daniel wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is not CPU, it's memory,
Phillip Jones avait prétendu :
Daniel wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/23/2010 4:55 AM, Daniel wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Phillip Jones avait prétendu :
Daniel wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/23/2010 4:55 AM, Daniel wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using
Phillip Jones avait prétendu :
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Phillip Jones avait prétendu :
Daniel wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/23/2010 4:55 AM, Daniel wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all that much. Mine
is using 340MB for example.
Dans son message précédent, chicagofan a écrit :
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 7:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is
On 2/23/2010 4:55 AM, Daniel wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all that
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Dans son message précédent, chicagofan a écrit :
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 7:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 7:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Dans son message précédent, chicagofan a écrit :
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 7:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now,
and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is
Paul B. Gallagher a écrit :
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Dans son message précédent, chicagofan a écrit :
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 7:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher a écrit :
On my R40 Thinkpad (256MB ram) and with your link loaded, SM 2.0.3
takes only 38,6MB as seen in Task Manager.
How about if you browse around for a while and load up the cache, is
it still only 38.6 MB? Or is that only on startup?
h
I've used SM on Hallmark before, but I've spent hours today trying to
get an edited sympathy card to process and continue.
I'm using WinXP,SP2 and I emptied my SM cache, restarted the browser,
and even my PC, and also checked my CPU usage. The CPU usage spiked
occasionally, but not
chicagofan wrote:
I've used SM on Hallmark before, but I've spent hours today trying to
get an edited sympathy card to process and continue.
I'm using WinXP,SP2 and I emptied my SM cache, restarted the browser,
and even my PC, and also checked my CPU usage. The CPU usage spiked
occasionally,
robert.ga...@att.net wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
I've used SM on Hallmark before, but I've spent hours today trying to
get an edited sympathy card to process and continue.
I'm using WinXP,SP2 and I emptied my SM cache, restarted the browser,
and even my PC, and also checked my CPU usage. The CPU
chicagofan wrote:
robert.ga...@att.net wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
I've used SM on Hallmark before, but I've spent hours today trying to
get an edited sympathy card to process and continue.
I'm using WinXP,SP2 and I emptied my SM cache, restarted the browser,
and even my PC, and also checked my
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all that much. Mine
is using 340MB for example. But then my machine has 2GB total
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all that much. Mine
is using 340MB for example. But then my
On 2/22/2010 7:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all that much. Mine
is
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 7:37 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 2/22/2010 6:40 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Just for the heck of it, I checked my CPU usage again just now, and it
showed SM using 177MB. Is that normal?
bj
177MB is not CPU, it's memory, and 177MB doesn't seem all
22 matches
Mail list logo
