Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-15 Thread Wayne Mery
On 6/9/2009 9:30 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Yes, it is, we cannot release a stable SeaMonkey release without a stable mail/news backend, which we only will have once Thunderbird 3 goes into at least RC phase. That said, we'll have a first beta of SM2 in the next few weeks,

Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-10 Thread Daniel
David Wilkinson wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: AFAIK it's only for searching, not for actually storing/driving any actual information like read/unread state, so it probably won't affect that. There are plans for fixing this (for the next release after TB3/SM2), but the "gloda" index for search ha

Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-10 Thread David Wilkinson
Robert Kaiser wrote: AFAIK it's only for searching, not for actually storing/driving any actual information like read/unread state, so it probably won't affect that. There are plans for fixing this (for the next release after TB3/SM2), but the "gloda" index for search has no influence on that f

Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-10 Thread Robert Kaiser
David Wilkinson wrote: Thanks. Will this indexing get rid of the annoying feature where a cross-posted news message that is read in one group is not seen as read in another? AFAIK it's only for searching, not for actually storing/driving any actual information like read/unread state, so it pro

Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-09 Thread Jens Hatlak
John wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: I'm sure there will be many good things in SM2, but for me the most important order of business is getting the FireFox 3 rendering engine. Already there are several sites I use (one in particular) that do not render well in SM1.x. Expanding on this question

Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-09 Thread John
David Wilkinson wrote: I'm sure there will be many good things in SM2, but for me the most important order of business is getting the FireFox 3 rendering engine. Already there are several sites I use (one in particular) that do not render well in SM1.x. Expanding on this question, I hope that

Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-09 Thread David Wilkinson
Robert Kaiser wrote: Yes, it is, we cannot release a stable SeaMonkey release without a stable mail/news backend, which we only will have once Thunderbird 3 goes into at least RC phase. That said, we'll have a first beta of SM2 in the next few weeks, a second beta a few weeks later and then a

Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-08 Thread Robert Kaiser
David Wilkinson wrote: So my question is: Is the release of SM2 being delayed until Thunderbird 3 is finished? Yes, it is, we cannot release a stable SeaMonkey release without a stable mail/news backend, which we only will have once Thunderbird 3 goes into at least RC phase. That said, we'l

Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-08 Thread David Wilkinson
dominique wrote: I personally find the current SM2 nightlies at a very high level of quality (a good beta, compared to some other open source dev...), thanks to the work of the whole team ! Although this work is still referred to as "alpha", it is very usable and reliable. dominique: I don't

Re: SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-08 Thread dominique
David Wilkinson wrote, On 6/8/2009 1:55 PM: I'm sure there will be many good things in SM2, but for me the most important order of business is getting the FireFox 3 rendering engine. Already there are several sites I use (one in particular) that do not render well in SM1.x. So my question is: Is

SeaMonkey 2 and Thunderbird 3

2009-06-08 Thread David Wilkinson
I'm sure there will be many good things in SM2, but for me the most important order of business is getting the FireFox 3 rendering engine. Already there are several sites I use (one in particular) that do not render well in SM1.x. So my question is: Is the release of SM2 being delayed until Thu