Re: SeaMonkey Mail performance problems

2009-06-03 Thread Eugene Mitev
I fully agree with Moz Champion (Dan). F-PROT do not protect from 
attacks. I use Comodo firewall. For more than 10 years I havn't any 
intrusion.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Mail performance problems

2009-06-02 Thread flyguy

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) on 
what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz system 
running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM..  SeaMonkey mail 
performance, especially anything moving messages between folders, is 
really slow (like several seconds to move a message).  I've 
compressed folders and rebuilt indexes and no improvement.  I'm 
using F-PROT anti-virus.  CPU usage according to Task Manager is in 
the single-digit percentage range.


I run SeaMonkey at home with larger folders on a much older system 
with better performance -- but it is Windows XP and different 
anti-virus.


The system disk is defragmented frequently.

What else do I check?

Thanks,
Bob



Long shot, but try turning your anti-virus OFF completely and then 
moving messages... any improvement?


Such a test can indicate if it is anti-virus program releated or not. 
You can disconnect from the internet when you make the test if you 
have a mind to although its not really neccessary.


Well, turning off F-PROT's file system protection does indeed improve 
performance.


Bob


In that case I suggest leaving F-Prot off. It is not really protecting 
you fully in any case.


An anti-virus program is only as good as its 'definintions' file is, and 
regardless of how often it is updated, that file lags behind reality.
For example;  the I Love You virus, which infected over 30 million 
users (biggest infestation in history) was checked by many with the 
latest and greatest AV programs, and came back 'clean'. NONE of the AV 
programs extant at the time could detect the virus until their 
definitions files were updated, and that took three to seven days for 
the AV programs to do.


So, even with F-Prot running, and automatic updating, there is still a 3 
to 7 day 'window' in which you are not protected against a 'new' virus.


So how to protect yourself? Simple.

Do NOT open email attachments  (opening email is fine, just not the 
attachments )

 If you MUST open an attachment
 Save it to disk for a week
 Update your AV program, check the file
 Open/run the attachment

Do NOT open/run files from the web
If yoiu MUST open/run files from the web
Save it to disk for a week
   Update your AV program, check the file
Open/run the file

Use a firewall

Using such a system allows you to run, and be fully protected against 
all malware, regardless of how new it is.  The above system has 
protected ALL my computers since 1992 and has never failed. It has also 
been used by hundreds of users I advised and they never reported an 
infection (at least to me).


Aren't you still vulnerable to drive-by downloads when visiting a 
website, or is SM immune to those?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Mail performance problems

2009-06-02 Thread Moz Champion (Dan)

flyguy wrote:

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) 
on what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz 
system running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM..  SeaMonkey mail 
performance, especially anything moving messages between folders, 
is really slow (like several seconds to move a message).  I've 
compressed folders and rebuilt indexes and no improvement.  I'm 
using F-PROT anti-virus.  CPU usage according to Task Manager is in 
the single-digit percentage range.


I run SeaMonkey at home with larger folders on a much older system 
with better performance -- but it is Windows XP and different 
anti-virus.


The system disk is defragmented frequently.

What else do I check?

Thanks,
Bob



Long shot, but try turning your anti-virus OFF completely and then 
moving messages... any improvement?


Such a test can indicate if it is anti-virus program releated or 
not. You can disconnect from the internet when you make the test if 
you have a mind to although its not really neccessary.


Well, turning off F-PROT's file system protection does indeed improve 
performance.


Bob


In that case I suggest leaving F-Prot off. It is not really protecting 
you fully in any case.


An anti-virus program is only as good as its 'definintions' file is, 
and regardless of how often it is updated, that file lags behind reality.
For example;  the I Love You virus, which infected over 30 million 
users (biggest infestation in history) was checked by many with the 
latest and greatest AV programs, and came back 'clean'. NONE of the AV 
programs extant at the time could detect the virus until their 
definitions files were updated, and that took three to seven days for 
the AV programs to do.


So, even with F-Prot running, and automatic updating, there is still a 
3 to 7 day 'window' in which you are not protected against a 'new' virus.


So how to protect yourself? Simple.

Do NOT open email attachments  (opening email is fine, just not the 
attachments )

 If you MUST open an attachment
 Save it to disk for a week
 Update your AV program, check the file
 Open/run the attachment

Do NOT open/run files from the web
If yoiu MUST open/run files from the web
Save it to disk for a week
   Update your AV program, check the file
Open/run the file

Use a firewall

Using such a system allows you to run, and be fully protected against 
all malware, regardless of how new it is.  The above system has 
protected ALL my computers since 1992 and has never failed. It has 
also been used by hundreds of users I advised and they never reported 
an infection (at least to me).


Aren't you still vulnerable to drive-by downloads when visiting a 
website, or is SM immune to those?



[Tools--Options]*--Navigator--Downloads

Either choose Open the download manager or open a process dialog
in this manner you are kept informed at the very least.

You should also have a set place to download to as well

If a site attempts to download something, without asking first, then I 
would kill the download and leave said site. I would also report the 
site to its host.


In any case, even if it does by some strange circumstance get downloaded
then the rule still applies

Do NOT open/run files from the web


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Mail performance problems

2009-06-02 Thread Moz Champion (Dan)

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

flyguy wrote:

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) 
on what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz 
system running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM..  SeaMonkey mail 
performance, especially anything moving messages between folders, 
is really slow (like several seconds to move a message).  I've 
compressed folders and rebuilt indexes and no improvement.  I'm 
using F-PROT anti-virus.  CPU usage according to Task Manager is 
in the single-digit percentage range.


I run SeaMonkey at home with larger folders on a much older system 
with better performance -- but it is Windows XP and different 
anti-virus.


The system disk is defragmented frequently.

What else do I check?

Thanks,
Bob



Long shot, but try turning your anti-virus OFF completely and then 
moving messages... any improvement?


Such a test can indicate if it is anti-virus program releated or 
not. You can disconnect from the internet when you make the test if 
you have a mind to although its not really neccessary.


Well, turning off F-PROT's file system protection does indeed 
improve performance.


Bob


In that case I suggest leaving F-Prot off. It is not really 
protecting you fully in any case.


An anti-virus program is only as good as its 'definintions' file is, 
and regardless of how often it is updated, that file lags behind 
reality.
For example;  the I Love You virus, which infected over 30 million 
users (biggest infestation in history) was checked by many with the 
latest and greatest AV programs, and came back 'clean'. NONE of the 
AV programs extant at the time could detect the virus until their 
definitions files were updated, and that took three to seven days for 
the AV programs to do.


So, even with F-Prot running, and automatic updating, there is still 
a 3 to 7 day 'window' in which you are not protected against a 'new' 
virus.


So how to protect yourself? Simple.

Do NOT open email attachments  (opening email is fine, just not the 
attachments )

 If you MUST open an attachment
 Save it to disk for a week
 Update your AV program, check the file
 Open/run the attachment

Do NOT open/run files from the web
If yoiu MUST open/run files from the web
Save it to disk for a week
   Update your AV program, check the file
Open/run the file

Use a firewall

Using such a system allows you to run, and be fully protected against 
all malware, regardless of how new it is.  The above system has 
protected ALL my computers since 1992 and has never failed. It has 
also been used by hundreds of users I advised and they never reported 
an infection (at least to me).


Aren't you still vulnerable to drive-by downloads when visiting a 
website, or is SM immune to those?



[Tools--Options]*--Navigator--Downloads

Either choose Open the download manager or open a process dialog
in this manner you are kept informed at the very least.

You should also have a set place to download to as well

If a site attempts to download something, without asking first, then I 
would kill the download and leave said site. I would also report the 
site to its host.


In any case, even if it does by some strange circumstance get downloaded
then the rule still applies

Do NOT open/run files from the web





Sorry, forgot the addendum

*varies by OS
Linux
[Edit--Preferences]
Mac
[SeaMonkey--Preferences]
Windows as above
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Mail performance problems

2009-05-21 Thread Ray_Net

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) on 
what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz system 
running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM..  SeaMonkey mail 
performance, especially anything moving messages between folders, is 
really slow (like several seconds to move a message).  I've 
compressed folders and rebuilt indexes and no improvement.  I'm 
using F-PROT anti-virus.  CPU usage according to Task Manager is in 
the single-digit percentage range.


I run SeaMonkey at home with larger folders on a much older system 
with better performance -- but it is Windows XP and different 
anti-virus.


The system disk is defragmented frequently.

What else do I check?

Thanks,
Bob



Long shot, but try turning your anti-virus OFF completely and then 
moving messages... any improvement?


Such a test can indicate if it is anti-virus program releated or not. 
You can disconnect from the internet when you make the test if you 
have a mind to although its not really neccessary.


Well, turning off F-PROT's file system protection does indeed improve 
performance.


Bob


In that case I suggest leaving F-Prot off. It is not really protecting 
you fully in any case.


An anti-virus program is only as good as its 'definintions' file is, and 
regardless of how often it is updated, that file lags behind reality.
For example;  the I Love You virus, which infected over 30 million 
users (biggest infestation in history) was checked by many with the 
latest and greatest AV programs, and came back 'clean'. NONE of the AV 
programs extant at the time could detect the virus until their 
definitions files were updated, and that took three to seven days for 
the AV programs to do.


So, even with F-Prot running, and automatic updating, there is still a 3 
to 7 day 'window' in which you are not protected against a 'new' virus.


So how to protect yourself? Simple.

Do NOT open email attachments  (opening email is fine, just not the 
attachments )

 If you MUST open an attachment
 Save it to disk for a week
 Update your AV program, check the file
 Open/run the attachment

Do NOT open/run files from the web
If yoiu MUST open/run files from the web
Save it to disk for a week
   Update your AV program, check the file
Open/run the file

Use a firewall

Using such a system allows you to run, and be fully protected against 
all malware, regardless of how new it is.  The above system has 
protected ALL my computers since 1992 and has never failed. It has also 
been used by hundreds of users I advised and they never reported an 
infection (at least to me).


You can leave F-Prot off until you really need it, such as checking 
files/attachments just before opening or running after the week 'save' 
of course.


Good consels  in my AV, i can disable the Internet E-Mail 
Auto-Protect protection ... not really needed because the protection 
works before the run of something. (may be that the disabled check works 
only during the download of the e-mail and have noting to do with the 
current issue)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Mail performance problems

2009-05-20 Thread Bob Fleischer

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) on 
what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz system 
running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM..  SeaMonkey mail 
performance, especially anything moving messages between folders, is 
really slow (like several seconds to move a message).  I've compressed 
folders and rebuilt indexes and no improvement.  I'm using F-PROT 
anti-virus.  CPU usage according to Task Manager is in the 
single-digit percentage range.


I run SeaMonkey at home with larger folders on a much older system 
with better performance -- but it is Windows XP and different anti-virus.


The system disk is defragmented frequently.

What else do I check?

Thanks,
Bob



Long shot, but try turning your anti-virus OFF completely and then 
moving messages... any improvement?


Such a test can indicate if it is anti-virus program releated or not. 
You can disconnect from the internet when you make the test if you have 
a mind to although its not really neccessary.


Well, turning off F-PROT's file system protection does indeed improve 
performance.


Bob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Mail performance problems

2009-05-20 Thread Moz Champion (Dan)

Bob Fleischer wrote:

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) on 
what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz system 
running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM..  SeaMonkey mail 
performance, especially anything moving messages between folders, is 
really slow (like several seconds to move a message).  I've 
compressed folders and rebuilt indexes and no improvement.  I'm using 
F-PROT anti-virus.  CPU usage according to Task Manager is in the 
single-digit percentage range.


I run SeaMonkey at home with larger folders on a much older system 
with better performance -- but it is Windows XP and different 
anti-virus.


The system disk is defragmented frequently.

What else do I check?

Thanks,
Bob



Long shot, but try turning your anti-virus OFF completely and then 
moving messages... any improvement?


Such a test can indicate if it is anti-virus program releated or not. 
You can disconnect from the internet when you make the test if you 
have a mind to although its not really neccessary.


Well, turning off F-PROT's file system protection does indeed improve 
performance.


Bob


In that case I suggest leaving F-Prot off. It is not really protecting 
you fully in any case.


An anti-virus program is only as good as its 'definintions' file is, and 
regardless of how often it is updated, that file lags behind reality.
For example;  the I Love You virus, which infected over 30 million 
users (biggest infestation in history) was checked by many with the 
latest and greatest AV programs, and came back 'clean'. NONE of the AV 
programs extant at the time could detect the virus until their 
definitions files were updated, and that took three to seven days for 
the AV programs to do.


So, even with F-Prot running, and automatic updating, there is still a 3 
to 7 day 'window' in which you are not protected against a 'new' virus.


So how to protect yourself? Simple.

Do NOT open email attachments  (opening email is fine, just not the 
attachments )

 If you MUST open an attachment
 Save it to disk for a week
 Update your AV program, check the file
 Open/run the attachment

Do NOT open/run files from the web
If yoiu MUST open/run files from the web
Save it to disk for a week
   Update your AV program, check the file
Open/run the file

Use a firewall

Using such a system allows you to run, and be fully protected against 
all malware, regardless of how new it is.  The above system has 
protected ALL my computers since 1992 and has never failed. It has also 
been used by hundreds of users I advised and they never reported an 
infection (at least to me).


You can leave F-Prot off until you really need it, such as checking 
files/attachments just before opening or running after the week 'save' 
of course.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SeaMonkey Mail performance problems

2009-05-19 Thread Bob Fleischer
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) on 
what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz system 
running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM..  SeaMonkey mail performance, 
especially anything moving messages between folders, is really slow 
(like several seconds to move a message).  I've compressed folders and 
rebuilt indexes and no improvement.  I'm using F-PROT anti-virus.  CPU 
usage according to Task Manager is in the single-digit percentage range.


I run SeaMonkey at home with larger folders on a much older system with 
better performance -- but it is Windows XP and different anti-virus.


The system disk is defragmented frequently.

What else do I check?

Thanks,
Bob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Mail performance problems

2009-05-19 Thread Moz Champion (Dan)

Bob Fleischer wrote:
I have been running the latest releases of SeaMonkey (now 1.1.16) on 
what should be a rather hot system -- a Core 2 quad 3.0 GHz system 
running Vista Business 64-bit in 8 GB RAM..  SeaMonkey mail performance, 
especially anything moving messages between folders, is really slow 
(like several seconds to move a message).  I've compressed folders and 
rebuilt indexes and no improvement.  I'm using F-PROT anti-virus.  CPU 
usage according to Task Manager is in the single-digit percentage range.


I run SeaMonkey at home with larger folders on a much older system with 
better performance -- but it is Windows XP and different anti-virus.


The system disk is defragmented frequently.

What else do I check?

Thanks,
Bob



Long shot, but try turning your anti-virus OFF completely and then 
moving messages... any improvement?


Such a test can indicate if it is anti-virus program releated or not. 
You can disconnect from the internet when you make the test if you have 
a mind to although its not really neccessary.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey