On 6/28/2015 11:57 PM, cmcadams wrote:
...
A few things with respect to the HTML emails: keyboard cursor functions.
Press PageDown, for instance, or CTRL_PageDown, and it can leap to the
top (or anyplace), and not that predictably. It seems to depend on the
material.
In 2.26.1, when you
Ant wrote:
...
I am using a Tinderbox build of SM 2.35. It works pretty well. The
only real problem I had was YouTube sending HTML5 videos instead of
Flash. There is an extension that can fix that.
Which extension is that? Mine always use Flash. I think my YouTube
account is set to use
Ant wrote:
On 6/27/2015 1:01 AM, cmcadams wrote:
...
I don't check for updates at present. I see them in passing, but I'm not
interested. One of my very specific reasons for staying with 2.26.1
has to do with how the HTML email editor still functions. As opposed to
the non-functioning evident
...
I am using a Tinderbox build of SM 2.35. It works pretty well. The
only real problem I had was YouTube sending HTML5 videos instead of
Flash. There is an extension that can fix that.
Which extension is that? Mine always use Flash. I think my YouTube
account is set to use Flash so I can
...
I don't remember what I used.
Might have been via BBS.
Ah... yea, I think there was some sort of cat... puma, tiger, or
something.
Lynx, perhaps? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynx_%28web_browser%29
First released in 1992 according to Wikipedia, but it's a cat from the
right era and I
On 6/27/2015 1:01 AM, cmcadams wrote:
...
I don't check for updates at present. I see them in passing, but I'm not
interested. One of my very specific reasons for staying with 2.26.1
has to do with how the HTML email editor still functions. As opposed to
the non-functioning evident in later
WaltS48 wrote:
On 06/25/2015 09:10 PM, cmcadams wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I
can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade, because my
short term
memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the steps to
Ray Davison wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade,
That is why I don't upgrade. I install the new without effecting the
previous. Sometimes the new has problems, or
Paul in Houston TX wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 26/06/2015 8:48 AM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Snip
That has not happened to me since 1991.
1991!! What did you use back then Mosaic or something?? (I can
only go back as far as
Netscape Navigator 0.9 in 1995 or 1996!)
Good question.
I don't
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Paul in Houston TX wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 26/06/2015 8:48 AM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Snip
That has not happened to me since 1991.
1991!! What did you use back then Mosaic or something?? (I can
only go back as far as
Netscape Navigator
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Be careful using the same profile between different versions. Sometimes
a newer version introduces a new format for some of the files in the
profile.
My files began life in Netscape. I only recall once in recent times
when I needed different
chicagofan wrote:
hawker wrote:
On 6/25/2015 5:06 PM, chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade,
because my short term memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten
the
steps
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade,
because my short term memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the
steps to upgrade [safely]. I'm assuming instructions will still
Daniel wrote:
On 26/06/2015 8:48 AM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Snip
That has not happened to me since 1991.
1991!! What did you use back then Mosaic or something?? (I can only go
back as far as
Netscape Navigator 0.9 in 1995 or 1996!)
Good question.
I don't remember what I used.
On 6/25/2015 5:06 PM, chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade,
because my short term memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the
steps to upgrade [safely]. I'm assuming
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade,
because my short term memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the
steps to upgrade [safely]. I'm assuming
But, to answer your question, I am using 2.33, on W7U-64, and have no
issues.
v2.33.1 gave you issues? For me, I use v2.33.1 to be updated and secured.
--
Ants never lend, ants never borrow. --unknown
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \
On 26/06/2015 8:48 AM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Snip
That has not happened to me since 1991.
1991!! What did you use back then Mosaic or something?? (I can only
go back as far as Netscape Navigator 0.9 in 1995 or 1996!)
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade,
because my short term memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the
steps to upgrade [safely]. I'm assuming instructions will still be at
the site
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade,
because my short term memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the
steps to upgrade [safely]. I'm assuming instructions will still
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many problems
I can't
keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade, because my short term
memory is so
pathetic, and I've also forgotten the steps to upgrade [safely]. I'm assuming
instructions
will
On 06/25/2015 09:10 PM, cmcadams wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I
can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade, because my
short term
memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the steps to upgrade
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many
problems I can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade,
That is why I don't upgrade. I install the new without effecting the
previous. Sometimes the new has problems, or maybe you just
chicagofan wrote:
What is the most reliable version available now? I've read of so many problems
I
can't keep up with them, and I've been afraid to upgrade, because my short term
memory is so pathetic, and I've also forgotten the steps to upgrade [safely].
I'm
assuming instructions will still
24 matches
Mail list logo
