Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Not complaining, but your answer sounds a lot like we're doing it now
in a much less efficient way, but look how fast we do it.
Well, then it sounds wrong. What he probably wanted to say is that the
redesigned profile handling we inherited from the
In news:jbedndubkfqs6nrwnz2dnuvz_j5i4...@mozilla.org,
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote:
On that topic, could SM have a feature to open a new profile in
another window *without* shutting down? Yes, if you do something dumb
with shared folders your can hurt yourself...
Depending on whether
Philip Chee wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:43:19 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
And as I indicated before, the issue is not merely backups. The size of
just SeaMonkey 2.0.1 seems to slow the changing of profiles.
Nothing to do with the size of the profile. The underlying gecko toolkit
we are
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Not complaining, but your answer sounds a lot like we're doing it now
in a much less efficient way, but look how fast we do it.
Well, then it sounds wrong. What he probably wanted to say is that the
redesigned profile handling we inherited from the newer Mozilla
On 02/01/2010 13:44, David E. Ross wrote:
places.sqlite 2.1 MB
You could try vacuuming the places database.
What does that mean and how do I do it?
http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/08/vacuum-firefox-databases-for-better-performance-now-with-no-restart/
Some background:
Philip Chee wrote:
On 02/01/2010 13:44, David E. Ross wrote:
places.sqlite 2.1 MB
You could try vacuuming the places database.
What does that mean and how do I do it?
http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/08/vacuum-firefox-databases-for-better-performance-now-with-no-restart/
Some
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:17:14 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
For users that are not techno nerds. what exactly does this procedure
do. and does it damage anything you have setup in SM to make it work
like you want. ? I've saved the code to try after I find out exactly
what it does.
Follow the
On 1/2/2010 7:16 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:17:14 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
For users that are not techno nerds. what exactly does this procedure
do. and does it damage anything you have setup in SM to make it work
like you want. ? I've saved the code to try after I
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:53:57 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
I noticed that my most-used profile in 2.0.1 contains four files each of
which exceeds 1 MB in size. The largest file in the corresponding
1.1.18 profile was 240 KB.
You do not say what these four files are. It would also help if you
On 1/1/2010 5:51 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:53:57 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
I noticed that my most-used profile in 2.0.1 contains four files each of
which exceeds 1 MB in size. The largest file in the corresponding
1.1.18 profile was 240 KB.
You do not say what these
On 1/1/2010 9:06 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/1/2010 5:51 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:53:57 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
I noticed that my most-used profile in 2.0.1 contains four files each of
which exceeds 1 MB in size. The largest file in the corresponding
1.1.18
David E. Ross wrote:
By the way, I have four different SeaMonkey profiles. Thus, the 8+
times increase in the size of each profile is indeed significant.
Note also that since SM 2 does not replace SM 1 (it installs as a new
program, and creates new profiles independent of the old ones),
On 1/1/2010 7:31 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
By the way, I have four different SeaMonkey profiles. Thus, the 8+
times increase in the size of each profile is indeed significant.
Note also that since SM 2 does not replace SM 1 (it installs as a new
program, and
On 1/1/2010 7:40 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/1/2010 7:31 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
By the way, I have four different SeaMonkey profiles. Thus, the 8+
times increase in the size of each profile is indeed significant.
Note also that since SM 2 does not replace SM 1
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:06:53 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/1/2010 5:51 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:53:57 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
I noticed that my most-used profile in 2.0.1 contains four files each of
which exceeds 1 MB in size. The largest file in the
On 1/1/2010 8:34 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:43:19 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
And as I indicated before, the issue is not merely backups. The size of
just SeaMonkey 2.0.1 seems to slow the changing of profiles.
Nothing to do with the size of the profile. The underlying
On 1/1/2010 7:49 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:06:53 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/1/2010 5:51 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:53:57 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
I noticed that my most-used profile in 2.0.1 contains four files each of
which exceeds 1 MB in
17 matches
Mail list logo
