Michal Charemza wrote:
!DOCTYPE, instead of
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC blah blah
Is this due to fproxy's anonymity filter? If so, why does it
remove/shorten them? Also, I've noticed that the default gateway page
does have a full doctype tag, why, if
Yes, because you could harvest the visitors'
!DOCTYPE, instead of
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC blah blah
The test site I inserted into my own node did have a full doctype tag
when I wrote it, but it didn't when I retrieved it, it just had !DOCTYPE.
Is this due to fproxy's anonymity filter? If so, why does it
remove/shorten them? Also,
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, this bug is really somewhere inside freenet. Either the accept()
call was not handled quick enough (dunno how accept is called in nio)
or Fred really closes open sockets without having sent any data.
Consistently? Can you write me a test case?
Since it
On Sunday 14 March 2004 09:35 pm, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
I'm getting way too many RNF/DNFs so any way to expand the available
routing would be a welcome thing either node. about 60% of the time it
doesn't even get off the originating node. I've tried putting each
other's node's ref
On 15 Mar 2004 at 14:10, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
Michal Charemza wrote:
!DOCTYPE, instead of
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC blah blah
Is this due to fproxy's anonymity filter? If so, why does it
remove/shorten them? Also, I've noticed that the default gateway page
does have a full doctype
