Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-20 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zenon Panoussis wrote: | | Toad wrote: | | The thing is, the lack of search capabilities reduces | the useability of freenet | | | Of course. There are ways to implement search, however. Sooner or later | somebody will implement a good spider based

RE: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-20 Thread Niklas Bergh
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zenon Panoussis Sent: den 20 juli 2004 05:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Load I wrote: Taking what you say here for granted, the entire discussion up to this

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-20 Thread Toad
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 11:50:02PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote: Indeed. Thus we have NIMs, FreeMail and Frost within Freenet, and outside it we have Mixmaster remailers, IIP, I2P, various kinds of proxies and so on. Sadly some people use hushmail too, which is not exactly the safest option.

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-20 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:14:49AM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote: I wrote: Taking what you say here for granted, the entire discussion up to this point is probably a meaningless exchange based on some misunderstanding on my part. But what? [URIs from logs] Would be interested to see

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-20 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:33:30AM -0500, David Masover wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zenon Panoussis wrote: | | Toad wrote: | | The thing is, the lack of search capabilities reduces | the useability of freenet | | | Of course. There are ways to implement

[freenet-support] Re: A severe freenet exploit?? - or just FUD?

2004-07-20 Thread Newsbyte
If the exploit is that low level, I don't really see how it could work,except perhaps by exploiting a remote execution hole in the hostoperating system (or JVM). Hmm..well, that may be a bit too much of 'brushing off'. Whether or not is is a fault in Freenet itself or in the JVM/OS,

[freenet-support] Anyone got Blackdown on

2004-07-20 Thread Toad
I need the output of: java -version 21 | head -n 1 | sed s/java version \\(.*\)\/\1/ on Blackdown, in order to fix the start-freenet.sh script to use NPTL where the JVM is 1.4.2 (I have Sun 1.5.0beta). -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey -

Re: [freenet-support] Anyone got Blackdown on

2004-07-20 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | I need the output of: | java -version 21 | head -n 1 | sed s/java version \\(.*\)\/\1/ | on Blackdown, in order to fix the start-freenet.sh script to use NPTL where the | JVM is 1.4.2 (I have Sun 1.5.0beta). 1.4.1 I'm on Blackdown, and

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-20 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:33:30AM -0500, David Masover wrote: | |Unfortunately, I can't work on this at all right now. My freenet node |looks fine, only I get a connection close from FProxy the instant I try |connecting -- that is, 0

[freenet-support] Routing problem?/Connectivity not working

2004-07-20 Thread harmon
***Ive been connected to the freenet project now for a little under 24 hours, though i've had to restart the demon three times in that time to fine-tune the configuration (allowing hosts, changing to a 1.5gb local store, and tweak the max connection limit) ***A couple problems so far.. All 4