"You know that your node is
transmitting bad stuff ..."
No, you don't. That's just the point, and that's why I
find your whole argumentation rather doubtful. Well, that and
others:
1)You have not given a legal decision or precedent ,
whereby an ISP as a corporation gets protection as a
That you don't see any activelinks and you get many
'couldn't connect' errors is not surprising, on a newbie node. It just needs
more time to get integrated into the network, probably.
But, there have been reports of problems with OSX
and JVM 1.4.2. For all this, you can find more info on
What about the logs?
/N
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah
Silverman
Sent: den 24 augusti 2004 07:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] OS X Problems
Only in the browser window. The terminal session
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:09:42AM +0200, Newsbyte wrote:
We will have to wait on the real first precedent...but I think the legal status of
freenet and it's users is rather good. Technical imperfections, like the lack of an
extra layer of encryption on the storage seems rather a greater
I have yet to be convinced that
the law requires a layer of meaningless snake oil.
Then it's up to you that, a) it's not
snake oil and/or b) that it's not meaningless.
As I've explained before, I think it's
not a matter of if, but of when Mr. Riaa will begin with the same tactics as
they
Thanks,
-N
Howard White wrote:
Been here. Did this: 1) Re-install which every Mac OS X 10.3.X or 10.2.X
that you have on CD. I've done regular installs and Clean installs and
both seem to work fine when writing over what ever version of Mac OS X that
you have.
2) Then upgrade via Software Update
On 25 Aug 2004 at 0:32, Toad wrote:
The weakness is insoluble. Unless nodes run 24x7 for LONG periods, and
encrypt the entire store with an ephemeral key, thus wiping it on
startup.
I thought it was a stated goal of freenet to make it impossible to
have this kind of breach without an
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 08:23:43PM -0400, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
On 25 Aug 2004 at 0:32, Toad wrote:
The weakness is insoluble. Unless nodes run 24x7 for LONG periods, and
encrypt the entire store with an ephemeral key, thus wiping it on
startup.
I thought it was a stated goal of
