|
>I have yet to be convinced that
the law requires a layer of meaningless snake oil.
Then it's up to you that, a) it's not
snake oil and/or b) that it's not meaningless.
As I've explained before, I think it's
not a matter of if, but of when Mr. Riaa will begin with the same tactics as
they do now on the regular internet. You claim it's not that easy, and I believe
you on your word, but Mr.Riaa and his ilk are not ALL stupid ninkenpoops, even
if they act like they are most of the time. Finding out the CHKs is not
THAT difficult, that it's beyond the means they have.
As you said yourself: nothing is
totally safe and secure; it allways depends on what means someone has and effort
he is prepared to do for breaking the security.
Currently, it's well within the means
of Mr.Riaa to use the same tactics as he is already doing, even when it's
harder. This means, that it's well within their means to make it very annoying
for the users, which ofcourse will reflect badly on Freenet, and it's
usefulness.
I predict this will happen as soon as
Freenet becomes wildly used. It is a too obvious weakness to miss, and too
obvious to let it stand. Sooner or later, we will have to deal with it.
(I prefer sooner).
|
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
