On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:09:42AM +0200, Newsbyte wrote: > We will have to wait on the real first precedent...but I think the legal status of > freenet and it's users is rather good. Technical imperfections, like the lack of an > extra layer of encryption on the storage seems rather a greater problem, IMHO.
I have yet to be convinced that the law requires a layer of meaningless snake oil. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
