Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread Ian Clarke
On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happensto be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no mainnetwork. There might be now, but the idea of the way it currently issetup is to allow small groups to connect

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread diddler4u
Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main network. There might be now, but the idea of the way it currently is setup is to allow small groups to connect without connecting to everyone else. That is

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread urza9814
Through the opennet. Which won't exist for, like, a year. Hmmm. On 8/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >>to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >>network. There might be

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread Evan Daniel
On 8/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >>to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >>network. There might be now, but the idea of the way it currently is >>setup is to allow smal

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread urza9814
Yea, but you don't know all the nodes in the network, you just know the ones your connected to. So if one of those links between the networks goes down, half your downloads stall out and die. And wouldn't that put a pretty big strain on certain computers? I mean, if you get this global network of

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread diddler4u
I agree. I wouldn't want to be the only connection between 2 networks, or even one of a small few. I simply don't have the bandwidth. Maybe a T1 or T3 could handle it, but not what 90+% of the people using freenet would have to work with. As I follow these threads I begin to see a core group o

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread Nicholas Sturm
When I opened the message below all that displayed was an icon. When I attempted to save the icon all hell broke loose. My mail client was closed. After some attempts I was able to reboot and the spamblocker (earthlink) had examined the message and found nothing suspicious. However now I found

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread Ian Clarke
8 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060826/7b424f61/attachment.html>

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread diddle...@hotmail.com
>>Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens >>to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main >>network. There might be now, but the idea of the way it currently is >>setup is to allow small groups to connect without connecting to >>everyone else.

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread urza9...@gmail.com
Through the opennet. Which won't exist for, like, a year. Hmmm. On 8/26/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com wrote: > >>Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens > >>to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main > >>network. There might be now, but

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread Evan Daniel
On 8/26/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com wrote: > >>Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens > >>to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main > >>network. There might be now, but the idea of the way it currently is > >>setup is to allow small grou

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread urza9...@gmail.com
Yea, but you don't know all the nodes in the network, you just know the ones your connected to. So if one of those links between the networks goes down, half your downloads stall out and die. And wouldn't that put a pretty big strain on certain computers? I mean, if you get this global network of s