[freenet-support] Would someone please re-insert these files?

2005-08-11 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
I've had a helluva time trying to d/l these and i'd be gratefull for a re-insert by anyone who has them. File: xpcorp.ISO Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED],t0N0QCiz0-a~LL08UL4XtA Bytes: 512360448 File: WinXPPlus.ISO Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED],gNGGF1n0TvCRjdzgtA-NRA Bytes: Thank you.

RE: Campaigning for Open-Net [WAS Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,

2006-08-29 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
5 and 0, 7] On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:54:12 -0400, you wrote: If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic. Tell you

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-29 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:39:59 +0200, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware will not support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME people, I don't have a hell I suggest linux. There

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Freenet 0.7 build 953

2006-08-29 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:25:16 -0400, you wrote: On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:19, Matthew Toseland wrote: - Don't start the updater if the wrapper is broken I have problems with this one. I do not run the wrapper - I do want freenet to download new stable versions and then quit. I have

[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

2006-11-04 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at

Re: [freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

2006-11-07 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk

Re: [freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

2006-11-07 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store on startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow like it should, now

Re: [freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

2006-11-12 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:21:08 +, you wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:49:39AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -, Anonymous via Panta

Re: [freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

2006-11-12 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:22:02 +, you wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 03:11:34AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: first you have the damned thing

Campaigning for Open-Net [WAS Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,

2006-08-30 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
5 and 0, 7] On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:54:12 -0400, you wrote: > > If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps > unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their > files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic. Tell you

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-30 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:39:59 +0200, you wrote: > > nobody at geonosis.homelinux.net wrote: > > > Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware > > will not > > support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME > > people, I > > don't have a hell

[freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Freenet 0.7 build 953

2006-08-30 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:25:16 -0400, you wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:19, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > - Don't start the updater if the wrapper is broken > > I have problems with this one. I do not run the wrapper - I do want freenet > to > download new stable versions and then

[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

2006-11-04 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk//

[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

2006-11-08 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: > > You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -0000, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > > > Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk > > SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- >

[freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

2006-11-08 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: > > > > first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store on > > startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow like > > it

[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

2006-11-12 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:21:08 +, you wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:49:39AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: > > > > > > You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. > > > > &g

[freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

2006-11-12 Thread Anonymous via Panta Rhei
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:22:02 +, you wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 03:11:34AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) > >