[freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

le Toolbar? Is that a requirement for running Freenet-tweaked Firefox? Thanks = Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freene

Re: [freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

nstalls an extra copy of Firefox for convinience purposes. It doesn't depend on it, so you can safely reinstall you normal Firefox. To access freenet go to http://localhost:/ at any of the web browsers on your machine. This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Se

[freenet-support] insecure mode and port forwarding

cted to ca. 13 nodes. I currently don't forward any ports through my hardware firewall, and I hesitate to do so without understanding the security implications. I'd appreciate suggestions for further reading re both issues. Thanks again. = Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[freenet-support] update and more questions

for at least a few weeks per instance? Also, I'd appreciate guidance re optimal CPU, memory, storage and bandwidth settings. The server has two 3.6 GHz Xeons and 4 Gb RAM, and I could spare 100 Gb RAID 10 storage and maybe 50 KiB/sec output bandwidth. = Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

At 06:18 AM 4/29/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 29 April 2008 03:44, Jim Cook wrote: > > Thank you again, Matthew (and Volodya) for your patience with my > > naive questions. Regarding the Firefox issue, I've foun

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

At 01:11 PM 4/30/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Wednesday 30 April 2008 00:27, Jim Cook wrote: > > At 06:18 AM 4/29/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > >> Old Signed by an unknown key > > > > > >On Tuesday

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

nonpersistent mode as an > > additional safeguard. But I do appreciate how doing that would > > partially defeat Freenet's data routing and retention logic. Anyway, > > I'm now thinking that running an encrypted virtual machine may be an > > acceptable

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

#1145. Within a few hours after the update, the node dropped all connections, and wouldn't reconnect until I stopped and restarted. I'll e-mail log excerpts off list. = Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Freenet and Tor

en Freenet nodes." That sounds cool. But is it feasible, given that Freenet uses UDP and Tor uses TCP? I've read on Freenet's website the possible ways to anonymize internode connections, and saw no mention of Tor. = Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet and Tor

At 09:18 AM 5/6/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 06 May 2008 02:49, Jim Cook wrote: > > Tor's FAQ notes ... > > > > "Tor and Freenet work on different levels: Tor is about transport, > > and Freenet is about

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

At 09:17 AM 5/6/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 06 May 2008 01:41, Jim Cook wrote: > > At 01:50 PM 5/5/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > > > > > > > After checking the logs, it's clear what'

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

d. Are you sure it tries to > reseed? Does >it > > >show the announcing alert on the homepage? What does it say in the > > >wrapper.log? > > > > On the homepage, it said that it was trying to connect, and that it

Re: [freenet-support] freenet wont connect to any other nodes

ne.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.

Re: [freenet-support] how to uninstall freenet?

ort >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freen

Re: [freenet-support] Firefox (Ubuntu) - Freenet is now default profile

>Support mailing list >Support@freenetproject.org >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = Jim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [freenet-support] How can a system administrator detect active freenodes?

rknet relatively easy to catch. Freenet (or whatever) users could just route all of their traffic through a proxy via securely-encrypted VPN, such as XeroBank with OpenVPN. Although you'd still know that they were hogging bandwidth, you wouldn't have a clue what they were doing with it.

[freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

le Toolbar? Is that a requirement for running Freenet-tweaked Firefox? Thanks = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[freenet-support] insecure mode and port forwarding

cted to ca. 13 nodes. I currently don't forward any ports through my hardware firewall, and I hesitate to do so without understanding the security implications. I'd appreciate suggestions for further reading re both issues. Thanks again. = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] update and more questions

for at least a few weeks per instance? Also, I'd appreciate guidance re optimal CPU, memory, storage and bandwidth settings. The server has two 3.6 GHz Xeons and 4 Gb RAM, and I could spare 100 Gb RAID 10 storage and maybe 50 KiB/sec output bandwidth. = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] update and more questions

At 06:18 AM 4/29/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 29 April 2008 03:44, Jim Cook wrote: > > Thank you again, Matthew (and Volodya) for your patience with my > > naive questions. Regarding the Firefox issue, I've foun

[freenet-support] Firefox (Ubuntu) - Freenet is now default profile

_ >Support mailing list >Support at freenetproject.org >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] update and more questions

At 01:11 PM 4/30/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Wednesday 30 April 2008 00:27, Jim Cook wrote: > > At 06:18 AM 4/29/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > >> Old Signed by an unknown key > > > > > >On Tuesday

[freenet-support] update and more questions

nonpersistent mode as an > > additional safeguard. But I do appreciate how doing that would > > partially defeat Freenet's data routing and retention logic. Anyway, > > I'm now thinking that running an encrypted virtual machine may be an > > acceptable alternative. > >Possibly. If it's transient it would be recreated on startup; if it isn't, it >would obviously be possible to investigate it if the computer was taken away. For now, I've just created an AES-encrypted virtual disk to store downloads. >* PGP Signed by an unknown key >* text/plain body >* Unknown Key >* 0xE43DA450 = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] update and more questions

#1145. Within a few hours after the update, the node dropped all connections, and wouldn't reconnect until I stopped and restarted. I'll e-mail log excerpts off list. = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] Freenet and Tor

en Freenet nodes." That sounds cool. But is it feasible, given that Freenet uses UDP and Tor uses TCP? I've read on Freenet's website the possible ways to anonymize internode connections, and saw no mention of Tor. = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] Freenet and Tor

At 09:18 AM 5/6/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 06 May 2008 02:49, Jim Cook wrote: > > Tor's FAQ notes ... > > > > "Tor and Freenet work on different levels: Tor is about transport, > > and Freenet is about

[freenet-support] update and more questions

At 09:17 AM 5/6/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 06 May 2008 01:41, Jim Cook wrote: > > At 01:50 PM 5/5/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > > > > > > > After checking the logs, it's clear what'

[freenet-support] update and more questions

d. Are you sure it tries to > reseed? Does >it > > >show the announcing alert on the homepage? What does it say in the > > >wrapper.log? > > > > On the homepage, it said that it was trying to connect, and that it > > would be slow for a while. I've e-mailed you the relevant part of > > the wrapper.log. > >What if you click on the alert? Show me the details. OK, the next time it happens, I'll reply again with the details. = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] freenet wont connect to any other nodes

ne.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] how to uninstall freenet?

et.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe = Jim Cook