Re: [freenet-support] NodeConfig, missing .dll error

2002-10-09 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Mike F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The most recent(and perhaps the one before that) freenet-webintall.exe comes > with a nodeconfig that requires MFC70.DLL which I don't have. I'm running > win98/IE5.5sp2(not default browser though). I was going to just download >

Re: [freenet-support] NodeConfig, missing .dll error

2002-10-09 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Josh Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Can people test the pre1_0.3 build and see if they have any new issues which > >haven't already been brought up? (if you get the unable to find mfc70, > >download the above file). > > > > > i just tried out the freenet-0.5_

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] new windows installer builds available

2002-10-10 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Sebastian Späth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Josh Steiner schrieb: > > it looks like these installers are not installing UpdateSnapshot.exe > > either. > > Ah, so are people actually using that? I found it quite handy (wrote it > basically for myself) but never got a

Re: [freenet-support] NodeConfig, missing .dll error

2002-10-10 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I stuck a copy of it up at http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/mfc70.zip > (it > > may need to be unzipped into the windows directory). This weekend I'll see > > what i can do getting it to installer without actaully having

[freenet-support] Yet another windows installer release

2002-10-23 Thread Mathew Ryden
Been busy - fixed a bug in not overwriting jar's on upgrade (using installer, not upgrader) Upgrader should work. Usual place. Test it (full install coming up in ~ 4 hours) -Mathew ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.

[freenet-support] Hopefully final 0.5 point release windows installer available

2002-10-23 Thread Mathew Ryden
I just bundled up my latest build of the installer. Changes since the last release: I added a warning to the systray app for when the temporary directory cannot be created. Hopefully fixed a problem when an upgrade installation fails (ie: while downloading the jar's), it doesn't leave the configur

Re: [freenet-support] please i need u !

2002-10-18 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Nicholas Sturm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Here is what I found in mine: > > [Freenet node] > # Freenet configuration file > # This file was automatically generated by WinConfig on 10/18/02 . . . > # The I.P. address of this node as seen by the public internet. > #

[freenet-support] New windows installer

2002-10-19 Thread Mathew Ryden
I've rebuilt the windows installer with install.log capabilities - could everyone who is having a problem with the node not running try it with the new exe (just follow the same links on the webpage) and email me their install.log if it is still not working? Thanks. -Mathew _

Re: [freenet-support] re:New windows installer

2002-10-19 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > the link on the main page still points to an installer date oct-17. please > update the /snapshots directory too It is--the news page isn't updated for every iteration of the windows installer. Just download it again and it should work. -M

Re: [freenet-support] small and big windows installer bugs

2002-10-20 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "William_dw -- Sqlcoders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:support-admin@;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > another thing, but i'm not sure if this is just because of my > > chaotic installation: > > FProxy/B

Re: [freenet-support] small and big windows installer bugs

2002-10-21 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> hello everybody > >> > >> after d/ling the new windows installer (what about prompting the installer's version on startup?! i was confused if the version i d/led was the most recent > >You should upgrade to version 520, the current snaps

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5rc2

2002-10-26 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The (second) hopefully final prerelease of Freenet 0.5, the first > "stable" release in far too long, is ready. Linux users may download it > from > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-0.5rc1.tgz?download >

[freenet-support] windows pre5 installer

2002-10-18 Thread Mathew Ryden
I've put up the new windows installer on http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-webinstall.exe . The main differences in this release are: * No longer sets ipAddress='internal name' * No more nodeStatus errors * Changed rtMaxRefs to 100 and changed info in freenet.ini * No MFC70 stuff (overall

[freenet-support] freenet 0.5rc1 windows installer packaged

2002-10-24 Thread Mathew Ryden
I've bundled up the rc1 installers. The webinstaller has almost no changes - just some strings modified to point to the new direcotries. The full installer on the other hand has quite a few changes to bring it up to where the web installer was last night. http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freene

[freenet-support] Yet another windows release

2002-10-19 Thread Mathew Ryden
Here's another windows-webinstall.exe release. This should hopefully fix the "javafind found java, then install told me it still couldn't find java" problems. Also some changes on temporary directory settings to allow one setting for them all. Everyone, please download and test it (save your freen

[freenet-support] Yet another freenet windows release

2002-10-20 Thread Mathew Ryden
Okay - let's see if this has gotten any better. I think the weird flaunch.ini bugs are fixed so the node might almost work. Please, anyone who I haven't turned off of freenet entirely, test the again updated installer at http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-webinstall.exe . Also, send any

[freenet-support] yet another another new windows installer

2002-10-21 Thread Mathew Ryden
I'm sure everyone's getting sick of me telling them this, but there is a new windows installer up. I changed the noderef file to the one on sourceforge, as well as tried to update the updater. I still can't get it to work here, but I have no way of telling what is causing that - be it my internet c

[freenet-support] Re: yet another another new windows installer

2002-10-21 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Mathew Ryden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm sure everyone's getting sick of me telling them this, but there is a new > windows installer up. > I changed the noderef file to the one on sourceforge, as well as tried to > updat

Re: [freenet-support] rc2.exe up to date?

2002-10-27 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > does the rc2.exe now contain build 525? It should, unless some magic occured between me and sourceforge. -Mathew ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-

[freenet-support] windows 0.5.0.2 online

2002-10-29 Thread Mathew Ryden
I've uploaded 0.5.0.2 monolithic and webinstalls. Both distributions have changed. There is better text (re: deleting temp directory), automatic setting of idle priority, and a localhost fix to get rid of all those pesky entries. Everyone should download this if just for the idle priority changes.

Re: [freenet-support] Lots of java errors in logfile

2002-10-30 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Vitenka - Zen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A little bit of further investigation has discovered that the rest of the > world is TRYING to talk to me - but the application isn't even listening on > port 21987 any more. I am confuzzled by this. > > I think the 'do you

Re: [freenet-support] It's installed...now what?

2002-10-31 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Nicholas Sturm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > See at bottom > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 10/30/2002 11:34:44 PM > > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] It's installed...now what? > > > > On

Re: [freenet-support] Persistently annoying "Route Not Found" problem

2002-10-31 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: Nicolas de la Vallee Poussin > I have a problem with freenet running on XP. I am trying to > set up a permanent node (since I have DSL access and never shut > off my computer) but am unable to get freenet to run at all. > > To avoid having to type the whole prob

[freenet-support] windows 0.5.0.4 monolithic installer updated

2002-10-31 Thread Mathew Ryden
I've uploaded the monolithic installer incase anyone actually uses that horrific thing (actually, an amazingly large amount of the freenet installs have been the monolithic installer) Anyways, the new installer is up, with no changes over the last monolithic installer (0.5.0.4-2). Hmm - I don't th

Re: [freenet-support] houston, we have a showstopper.

2002-11-01 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Waylon Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > i have windows freenet, latest webinstalled. unfortunately.. it seems not to have given me the default "unknown" settings or something. even my log file isnt working. help. Hmm. Please email your freenet.ini and install.

Re: [freenet-support] version - 139 - what are all thes extra ports?

2002-11-02 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Vitenka - Zen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 3:32 AM Subject: [freenet-support] version - 139 - what are all thes extra ports? > I have listeners (blocked at firewall) on ports 135 (rpcss.exe) 137-139 > (freenet.

Re: [freenet-support] Bugs ate my routing table

2002-11-02 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Vitenka - Zen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Win 98, Java 1.4_2, Build 529 Sun? > "Routing rtable corrupt" > "Please delete all rt files and restart freenet" > Do so, freenet starts - all requests cannot make it off the local node. > Reseed node; nothing improves. >

Re: [freenet-support] idea for wininstaller

2002-11-04 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Vitenka - Zen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Damn - forgot my other suggestion. > > Why not register fcp:// or similar, so that we can give links into freeweb from external websites > without having to rely upon guessing the client port the user has chosen? How would

Re: [freenet-support] windows 0.5.0.4 monolithic installer updated

2002-11-04 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Vitenka - Zen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Nodeconfig refuses point blank to run on my machine as of main build 529. > > >* make it so that nodeconf can change every option > > Secret options are bad :) I still seem to have an un-needed 'temporary directory' setting

Re: [freenet-support] Error

2002-11-09 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: juanjo > Dear friends, > > Sorry by my english. > I can't continue the instalation, please help me. Tanks. Do you have java installed? (A Microsoft one will not work with freenet) If not, java.sun.com should have a jvm for download on their site. > Juanjo, >

Re: [freenet-support] help

2002-11-09 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: winglui > Hello there, > > I'm new to the FreeNet. I have tried a few times to open FreeNet but > nothing happen. I also tried to click "open gateway" and only got a HTTP 500 > error. How can I get the Freedom Engine, the Frost and the Freeweb? > Please help. Fi

Re: [freenet-support] Why isn't audio/mpeg a standard fproxy mime type?

2002-12-17 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It really irritating to keep being asked if I "really" want to download > that mp3. You can add it yourself you know. :) I don't know the real reason, but if someone is using wmp (windows media player) to play their audio it will gu

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet newer than 5.0.7

2003-01-09 Thread Mathew Ryden
- Original Message - From: "Catalin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > When will the next "stable" version of freenet(5.0.8 or 5.1.0) become > available for download (the widnows version)? > Until then will there be available a complete 5.0.7 (or newer) windows > version? (like the 5.0.6-1 complete v