RE: [pfSense Support] 0.95 DynDns Doesn't Work

2005-11-30 Thread Frimmel, Ivan \(ISS South Africa\)
0.95a verified working on DynDns (custom) with the steps below. Thanks so much Scott! -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 8:16 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 0.95 DynDns Doesn't Work Found the proble

Re: [pfSense Support] captive portal - Is this possible?

2005-11-30 Thread Bill Marquette
On 11/30/05, Szasz Revai Endre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello again! > > About this old problem with the static arp entries.. > 20223 deny ip from 192.168.22.201 not MAC any 00:02:00:25:00:b6 any layer2 in > 20223 deny ip from any to 192.168.22.201 not MAC 00:02:00:25:00:b6 any > layer2 out > T

[pfSense Support] ipfw and pf

2005-11-30 Thread Tommaso Di Donato
Hi guys! Sorry, I read the last thread about captive portal, and from what I understood it is in plan to abandon ipfw. Does this means that in the future (e.g v1.0) it is planned to remove the ipfw kernel module? I am using ipfw for integrating pfsense with p3scan, so I would like to ask you if it

Re: [pfSense Support] PPTP Issue (Behind pfSense To pfSense)

2005-11-30 Thread Brian
Jeroen wrote: On 11/30/05, Jeroen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/29/05, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do you also have PPTP enabled on the pfSense that you are behind? That seems to be the trigger of the issue for me. If I disable PPTP on the pfSense box that I am behind @ home, I can

Re: [pfSense Support] 0.95b cannot do HD install

2005-11-30 Thread Scott Ullrich
Yes, we are in the process of trimming the ISO size. Scott On 11/30/05, Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > looks like someone stomped on expat :) > > On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 00:04 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote: > > libbsdxml > > > - >

Re: [pfSense Support] ipfw and pf

2005-11-30 Thread Scott Ullrich
Even if we dump it from the scripts, we will keep the module around for packages, etc. Scott On 11/30/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys! > Sorry, I read the last thread about captive portal, and from what I > understood it is in plan to abandon ipfw. Does this means tha

[pfSense Support] proxyarp + CARP

2005-11-30 Thread Rainer Duffner
Hi, how are the proxy-arp settings sync'ed to the other box? In the config, it says: Synchronize Virtual IPs When this option is enabled, this system will automatically sync the Virtual IP (minus proxyarp) settings over to the other carp host when changes are made. So, how do I setup this

Re: [pfSense Support] proxyarp + CARP

2005-11-30 Thread Scott Ullrich
Proxy ARP is not sync'd. Only carp settings + ip's are. Scott On 11/30/05, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > how are the proxy-arp settings sync'ed to the other box? > In the config, it says: > > Synchronize Virtual IPs > When this option is enabled, this system will automatica

Re: [pfSense Support] proxyarp + CARP

2005-11-30 Thread Rainer Duffner
Scott Ullrich wrote: Proxy ARP is not sync'd. Only carp settings + ip's are. OK, but does that mean I cannot use CARP in such a setup (multiple subnets protected by the firewall with real IPs)? Or do I just setup the proxyarp-entries on both boxes? They're static anyway. Does the 2n

Re: [pfSense Support] proxyarp + CARP

2005-11-30 Thread Scott Ullrich
Proxy ARP entries are not compatible with sync. Only Carp IP's. On 11/30/05, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott Ullrich wrote: > > >Proxy ARP is not sync'd. Only carp settings + ip's are. > > > > > > > > > OK, but does that mean I cannot use CARP in such a setup (multiple > subnet

Re: [pfSense Support] proxyarp + CARP

2005-11-30 Thread Rainer Duffner
Scott Ullrich wrote: Proxy ARP entries are not compatible with sync. Only Carp IP's. On 11/30/05, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Scott Ullrich wrote: Proxy ARP is not sync'd. Only carp settings + ip's are. Hm. Does that mean I can really only have one external

Re: [pfSense Support] ipfw and pf

2005-11-30 Thread Bill Marquette
Right. The hope is to remove ipfw from base. There's nothing in pfSense core that absolutely requires ipfw (although certain functionality that we decided not to rewrite for 1.0 currently is written to use ipfw). --Bill On 11/30/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Even if we dump it

Re: [pfSense Support] proxyarp + CARP

2005-11-30 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 11/30/05, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hm. Does that mean I can really only have one external IP with CARP, > currently? I have 15, so it works fine. > Or how else can this problem be attacked? > Does it work with OpenBSD? ---

Re: [pfSense Support] ipfw and pf

2005-11-30 Thread Tommaso Di Donato
Thank, guys! Otherwise, I would have to rebuid the kernel! On 11/30/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Right.  The hope is to remove ipfw from base.  There's nothing inpfSense core that absolutely requires ipfw (although certainfunctionality that we decided not to rewrite for 1.0 curren

Re: [pfSense Support] proxyarp + CARP

2005-11-30 Thread Rainer Duffner
Scott Ullrich wrote: On 11/30/05, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hm. Does that mean I can really only have one external IP with CARP, currently? I have 15, so it works fine. And how do you do that, if I may ask? cheers, Rainer

Re: [pfSense Support] proxyarp + CARP

2005-11-30 Thread Scott Ullrich
Click the + button in virtual ips and add 15 carp addresses. On 11/30/05, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott Ullrich wrote: > > >On 11/30/05, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Hm. Does that mean I can really only have one external IP with CARP, > >>currently? > >

Re: [pfSense Support] DynDns scheduling issues

2005-11-30 Thread Damien Dupertuis
Hello, I'm using 95.a and I just got my dyndns account banned... sorry I don't have time to put the logs here... I'll do it tomorrow... regards --- Damien Dupertuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hello, > > just for the record, here are my system logs from > 94.12, if ever... It is not upgrad

RE: [pfSense Support] New tutorial available: policy based multi WAN

2005-11-30 Thread Robo.K.
Many many thanks guys. -Original Message- From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 2:33 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] New tutorial available: policy based multi WAN Thanks to Dan Solsona we now have a tutorial how to setup p