For small areas, or central listeners, I do think there is a good
argument for not over egging the pudding with too many speakers for
low order material. But I am not at all convinced, based on
experience, that this is true when dealing off centre listeners in a
large area such as a concert since
Thank you for all suggestions!
I am also aware of t-design [1] for even distribution.
Does somebody have practical experience with those, except for virtual
loudspeaker arrangements?
Fons' 1+6+8+6+1 seems to be a good and easy to mount start.
Do you see a problem in increasing the number of
I must confess that I don't know much about what you are discussing
about, but I think I read in one of the posts (that I already have deleted)
that there is no need to place a lot of speakers directly above, as our
localization is at it's worst in that direction.
However, I have always thought
--
07580951119
augustine.leudar.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130711/c0d83a94/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound
://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130711/c0d83a94/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
--
--
As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from
Hi Eero,
Al revers amigo. I dont know how it works with ambisonics and soundfield
reconstruction but basically generally speaking your ears cant tell the
difference if a speaker directly overhead is half a metre this way or the
other - in effect your ears have lower resolution straight above
Really disappointed (but not too surprised) to that in the June AES in
an article about Spatial Audio, which says Spatial audio can be
reprocessed for reproduction over different loudspeaker formats using
upmixing and downmixing. It can even be rendered binaurally for
headphones. We review the
/listinfo/sursound
--
07580951119
augustine.leudar.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130711/c0d83a94/attachment.html
://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130711/1c14b510/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Augustine Leudar wrote:
Im all ears (pun not intended)
Hehe, me too. :-)
Practical things and theory possibly don't meet here. Anyway, I am confused.
Possibly I should have started a topic with a different name and not
stir this
thread.
Having built several installations and demos myself I
Decades ago, I was working on a project to find the best
way to equidistribute a large number of points on a sphere.
We were looking for random unit vectors.
(This had to do with choosing random orientations for a pot
containing a seed to see if the seed would sprout and grow
without benefit
Robert Greene wrote :
...
If you need more points, then
there is no canonical choice(and no one is going to discover
any more Platonic solids--there aren't any more!).
...
Sorry to start that one ... it was basically a joke (I say basically as
like perpetual motion machines I had the
If anyone cares, the proof is not too hard. Clearly one cannot have faces
that have more sides than five, because there no room angularly: three
regular hexagons at a point already fill up 360 degrees and seven or more
fill up more than 360, which is impossible(note that the solid has to be
13 matches
Mail list logo
