Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Michael Chapman
Fons wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:52:17AM +0100, Richard Dobson wrote: > >> If you find a .wav file somewhere on the net, what do expect >> it to contain? > > Audio signals of some sort... Just as a real 'use case' of how .wav files can be used (or ?abused). I created a file with one cycle

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:52:17AM +0100, Richard Dobson wrote: > If you find a .wav file somewhere on the net, what do expect > it to contain? Audio signals of some sort... All the rest must be carried by file headers or information 'chunks' such as the one used in the amb wav format. Ciao,

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 08:58:36PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > it is the panner that defines the capabilities of the downstream > bus and the meaning of every single channel in it. Couldn't be more right. > an 8-cube could be used as a bus, but that's not ambisonic mixing. > some people

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 10/02/2013 08:44 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote: He's from steinberg isnt he ? Damn you coffee. er so Yvan yes it makes sense and yes it would be super cool for sound designers everywhere if that could happen. It would also be great if Nuendo had a couple buses with vertical capability - like

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Richard Dobson
Given Yvan's deep presence within Steinberg (custodian of the VST SDK and VST-GUI among other things), I rather assumed he has made his inquiry because this is indeed a possibility. The case needs to be made, presumably. Which is why debating the virtues and vices of the file extension may be

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Richard Dobson
It is still better to associate verbs such as "allow" with the player, rather than with the file. Software allows you do do stuff, files just are what they are. The specialists here may argue about "any number of speakers". Classical Ambisonic decoding requires specific kinds of regular layout

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
nberg Media Technologies GmbH, Frankenstrasse 18b, D-20097 Hamburg, >>>> Germany >>>> Phone: +49 (40) 21035-0 | Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net >>>> Managing Director: Andreas Stelling, Kazunori Kobayashi >>>> Registration Court: Hamburg HRB 8653

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
| Fax: +49 (40) 21035-300 | www.steinberg.net >>> Managing Director: Andreas Stelling, Kazunori Kobayashi >>> Registration Court: Hamburg HRB 86534 >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>> - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
- - - - - - >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> >> __**_ >> Sursound mailing list >> Sursound@music.vt.edu >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<https

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread David McGriffy
Yvan, I would say yes, definitely, to both parts of question 1, both input and output capabilities would be useful. A normal workflow might go something like this: - record A-format (direct mic signals) in the field - Main project: + read the field recording in its native format, multi-mono,

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
t; > > > > -- > 07580951119 > > augustine.leudar.com > -- 07580951119 augustine.leudar.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131002/e0e5cdd1/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
19 augustine.leudar.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131002/96e7f346/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Michael Chapman
> rephrase after coffee (not sure if that will help) > So if this was to work in with a media player the media player would have > to know how many speakers you have and where they are (is 8 in a cube or > eight in the azimuth) - then the media player would have to decode to > .amb > file dependin

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Daniel Courville
Le 2013-10-02 06:50, Jörn Nettingsmeier a écrit : >On 10/02/2013 12:11 PM, Yvan Grabit wrote: >> 2) are there some Ambisonic plugins which could be use as Panners in >>Nuendo ? > >daniel courville has an extensive set of plugins at >http://www.radio.uqam.ca/ambisonic/b2x.html > >he may still be l

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
_ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound> > -- 07580951119 augustine.leudar.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... U

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 10/02/2013 06:21 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote: so I guess your media player would have to tell the .amb file how many speakers you were using and it would decode the 'amb file for the correct order ? this is getting really confused. the purpose of an ambisonic file format and extension is two

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
tinfo/sursound> > -- 07580951119 augustine.leudar.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131002/fc75d764/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Richard Dobson
It is really rather standard in computer music circles; we could call it a well-established convention, to associate a particular extension with a particular file format. There is a wide range of soundfile formats "out there", many of which predate WAVE (.au, .snd, etc); to say nothing of the

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Ben Bloomberg
n/listinfo/sursound<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound> > ------ next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131002/604ff8a2/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Richard Dobson
Sort of: the purpose of ambisonic encoding is to enable any given stream or file to be decoded into different speaker arrays; the purpose of the AMB format is to provide a standardised container (complete with file extension :-)) for B-Format streams (using FuMa encoding), and to disambiguat

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 10/02/2013 01:57 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote: I use nuendo - Im pretty sure you can use wigware ambisonic plugins - you can definitely use them in reaper- ah yes, of course. bruce wiggins' stuff is another great option - i keep forgetting it because i don't work on windows or mac... is anybo

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
"standard" > GUID. > > Paul > > -- > Paul Hodges > > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > -- 07580951119 augustine.leudar.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was s

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Paul Hodges
--On 02 October 2013 14:15 +0200 Sebastian Gabler wrote: > Unless there are practical aspects, like the custom GUID would crash > most of the amb-agnostic players, which I doubt. Sound Forge 10 (I haven't tried 11 yet) will refuse to open a .amb file even if named .wav, because it doesn't recog

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Sebastian Gabler
I am aware of these rather formal aspects. With the criteria of a self-describing format fulfilled, it comes down to a naming convention. Why that is part of a format specification is unclear to me. Moreover it may cause what is actually a misconception according to the below standing criteria

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Augustine Leudar
t; https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound> > -- 07580951119 augustine.leudar.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131002/5c730568/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Richard Dobson
It's not a proprietary extension, any more than is "doc", "txt" or "cpp". It is simply strongly recommended as standard. It is a common misconception that a file extension somehow defines a file format. It does not, and more importantly should not, if the format itself has been properly design

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
hi yvan, On 10/02/2013 12:11 PM, Yvan Grabit wrote: Hi 1) i want to known if it makes sense for an application like Nuendo (Steinberg) : - to import directly (without decoding) AMB (Ambisonic) Files (described in http://dream.cs.bath.ac.uk/researchdev/wave-ex/bformat.html) - to allow to expor

Re: [Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Sebastian Gabler
I guess it has been discussed here before, but why again is a proprietary extension proposed? See "The use of a custom GUID ensures that AMB files will not (and should not) be recognised as a soundfile by applications unaware of the format." Shouldn't that suffice, also for files that have th

[Sursound] Questions about support of .amb file (Wave based)

2013-10-02 Thread Yvan Grabit
Hi 1) i want to known if it makes sense for an application like Nuendo (Steinberg) : - to import directly (without decoding) AMB (Ambisonic) Files (described in http://dream.cs.bath.ac.uk/researchdev/wave-ex/bformat.html) - to allow to export them directly (no Encoding) This means that the Nuend