Hi Dave you have alway been very patient and helpful with us and I for one
appreciate that :-)
Ķan yes thats my site
On Wednesday, 9 October 2013, Dave Malham wrote:
> No worries - I have absolutely no problem with artistic motives, been
> working with artists all my life!
>
>Dave
>
>
> On 7
No worries - I have absolutely no problem with artistic motives, been
working with artists all my life!
Dave
On 7 October 2013 17:55, Kan Kaban wrote:
> Thanks a lot for those papers. Beautiful. Same month & year of my birth.
> Yes, I´ll do ambisonics and I´ll stay analogue as much as I can
Augustine, is this yours?:
http://augustine.leudar.com/events.htm
Lovely ideas, I have been working on VERY similar concepts for years. As the
interactive forest place… very nice. Congrats.
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.mu
> Hi Kan,
> Good luck with your project
Thanks!.
> - I think its a shame you don't feel
> comfortable being open about your ideas in this forum - but I can
> understand - you dont really feel like sharing if you think people are just
> going to jump down your throat everytime you make an error…..
Hi Kan,
Good luck with your project - I think its a shame you don't feel
comfortable being open about your ideas in this forum - but I can
understand - you dont really feel like sharing if you think people are just
going to jump down your throat everytime you make an error.
-- next
Thanks Mr. Chapman. Is nice to hear that from you. As soon as I have something…
On Oct 7, 2013, at 12:45 PM, "Michael Chapman" wrote:
>
> Hey, we're all in the gutter ... but some of us look at the stars (if not
> all the time).
>
> Whatever, good luck with the project ... and, maybe, risk shar
> Thanks a lot for those papers. Beautiful. Same month & year of my birth.
> Yes, I�ll do ambisonics and I�ll stay analogue as much as I can.
>
> There is a motive, but it is an artistic one. So, seems non sense to try
> to explain it here.
Hey, we're all in the gutter ... but some of us look at t
Thanks a lot for those papers. Beautiful. Same month & year of my birth.
Yes, I´ll do ambisonics and I´ll stay analogue as much as I can.
There is a motive, but it is an artistic one. So, seems non sense to try to
explain it here.
You will just throw stones in my head just for that idea.
Thanks
I agree with Jörn, doing this in analogue, today, for anything else than
enacting a zen koan to enlighten apprentices, seems decidedly weird... but
that's part of the point about art, right? If you really, really want to
do analogue Ambisonic stuff, I suggest you look at the two (hand written!)
re
Aaron Heller wrote:
Sorry to quibble, but if I feed a signal into the W and X inputs (with
appropriate scaling) and ground Y and Z, then the soundfield controls on a
Mk4 behave like a B-format panner. Right?
You are right.
The soundfield controller uses two switches to select the quadrant a
Thanks a lot to everyone. We´ll continue research until the idea goes clearer.
You have been very helpful. Cheers!.
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Eero Aro wrote:
The Soundfield microphone directional controls aren't exactly panning.
Sorry to quibble, but if I feed a signal into the W and X inputs (with
appropriate scaling) and ground Y and Z, then the soundfield controls on a
Mk4 behave like a B-format
>
> Mathematically,
> _if_ you have a perfect A-format signal set (from some theoretical
> tetrahedral mic) then it can be panned.
> For the _simple_ case of a yaw of X degrees, then
> A' = ( A(1+cosX) + B(-sinX) + C(sinX) + D(1-cosX) ) /2
> B' = ...
> etc.
> _I_think_ (this was very quick on the
Mathematically,
_if_ you have a perfect A-format signal set (from some theoretical
tetrahedral mic) then it can be panned.
For the _simple_ case of a yaw of X degrees, then
A' = ( A(1+cosX) + B(-sinX) + C(sinX) + D(1-cosX) ) /2
B' = ...
etc.
_I_think_ (this was very quick on the back of an envel
Those are lovely photographs Eero (auto-correction changed your name), thank
you. Maybe someday I´ll ask for those components values, when there´s enough
time to solder them!
> I do have the component values to the Audio & Design Transcoder and Decoder.
>
> Eero
-- next part -
Sorry Mr. McGriffy & Aero for the wrong quote, I don´t do lists since some
years ago.
Thanks a lot for all this info to everyone, I really appreciate your concern.
Now I have a lot to do…
I´m sorry if some ambisonics terminology is not being used as intended. I hope
you understand.
The idea of u
hi all!
re-reading my post, i notice that it could be construed as somewhat
hostile in tone. this was unintended, and i'd like to apologise if
anybody has taken offense.
On 09/26/2013 02:01 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 09/26/2013 09:21 AM, Kan Kaban wrote:
Our initial idea is to keep s
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:20:16PM -0500, Kan Kaban wrote:
> Yes, I know there´s no ambisonics until there is. The idea of amplitude
> panning, during A format stage, is to simplify an analogue path before
> b-format exists.
A-format panning means that the panner has to emulate the polar
pattern
David McGriffy wrote:
On 9/26/2013 2:15 PM, Eero Aro wrote:
Well, if there is some kind of B-format analogue panner we would also
like to learn about it´s design
Wrong quote, I didn't write that.
- - -
However, here you are:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22100835/Audio_Design_Ambison
If you have any kind of calibration involved, rotating before running
the A to B process makes that calibration meaningless.
In fact, I'd say that one of the main reasons B-format exists is
precisely that it makes processing like rotations a reasonable and
general thing to do.
David McGriffy
Well, if there is some kind of B-format analogue panner we would also
like to learn about it´s design
Audio & Design sold a Pan-Rotate Unit. There is a picture of it down here:
http://www.ambisonic.net/branwell_arb.html
The Soundfield microphone directional controls aren't exactly panning.
The
A first-order B-format panner needs to implement the equations
W = S * sqrt(1/2)
X = S * cos(az) * cos(el)
Y = S * sin(az) * cos(el)
Z = S * sin(el)
where S is the signal being panned and az and el define the direction.
The Calrec Soundfield MkIV controller box has analog circuitry for
s
Thanks for your reply Jörn. You´ll have to excuse my basic english sentences,
as it´s not my primary language.
> "A-format" panning as you call it has nothing to do with ambisonics per se,
> and the term frankly doesn't make much sense.
> the module you mention is a simple amplitude panner.
>
>
On 09/26/2013 09:21 AM, Kan Kaban wrote:
Greetings to all Sursound list.
First of all, thanks for all this years supporting Ambisonics. We´re
a collective of audiovisual artists preparing for our next project.
We have been researching ambisonics for the last few moths, seeding
the possibility of
Greetings to all Sursound list.
First of all, thanks for all this years supporting Ambisonics. We´re a
collective of audiovisual artists preparing for our next project. We have been
researching ambisonics for the last few moths, seeding the possibility of it´s
implementation. There are still so
25 matches
Mail list logo
