Hi,
For the number of speaker to use, you might want to look at the paper from
Peter Stitt on the spectral impairment of enclosed HOA (Ambisonics Symposium in
2012).
I also did a study beforehand on the influence of microphone and loudspeaker
setup on perceived HOA reproduced soundfield
thanks Ralph and Augustine for input on the tangential query, and Michael
for posting the original question... taken together, there are plenty of
useful suggestions, cheers!
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 3:53 AM Michael Bevers wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Pierre! Sounds like I have some more
Thanks for the reply, Pierre! Sounds like I have some more digging to do in
the list.
I'm reading through the papers on Jorn's website now. Thanks for pointing
me towards his work again.
Regarding the ideal Ambisonic playback array, I guess I am really just
looking to optimize the 20 speaker
ou can also derive such 4.0 tracks from B
> format
> > > recordings but get rid of the Z component. You can use an Ambiophone
> for
> > > free to make recordings if you like. RACE is also free to use.
> > >
> > > All this stuff is mostly free or very
alph Glasgal
> > BEP, MSEE, AES, IEEE
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sursound [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Phi
> Shu
> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 11:10 AM
> > To: Surround Sound discussion group
> > Subject
t is also a saving.
>
> Ralph Glasgal
> BEP, MSEE, AES, IEEE
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sursound [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Phi Shu
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 11:10 AM
> To: Surround Sound discussion group
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Stu
: Re: [Sursound] Study Comparing Ambisonic and Channel Based Systems
> You should consider Ambiophonics.
well, not sure it would integrate with my workflow, primarily using Nuendo
and Max right now.
With four speakers and 4.0 media such as
> Dolby Atmos or Auro3D or B format, you can have
ar
Sent: 29 April 2019 20:15:21
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Study Comparing Ambisonic and Channel Based Systems
Hi Phi,
I use 8 speakers often enough and have covered faily large areas and you
can get great effects including height with only 8 speakers, in fact you
can
Hi Phi,
I use 8 speakers often enough and have covered faily large areas and you
can get great effects including height with only 8 speakers, in fact you
can get height with just one speaker if you stick it up a tree :)
( its not how many speakers you have its where you put them ;) An
octophonic
ge-
> From: Sursound [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of
> Augustine
> Leudar
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2019 4:05 AM
> To: Surround Sound discussion group
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Study Comparing Ambisonic and Channel Based Systems
>
> I havent
Reading above, curious then, for those of us who don't have the luxury of
working with 24 channels plus, what is the best way to utilise 8 speakers
such that one can produce with a larger array in mind? (or at least
approach an approximation of how it might sound).
How to approach monitoring
There was a really interesting study which I cant for the life of me find
about an listening tests on focussed sources, or sounds appearing inside
the array with HOA at IRCAMS facility. Aside from nearly blowing the array
up trying to make the sound appear close to the centre of the array they
It might be helpful to reflect about the basics:
If ambisonics is about sound field reconstruction it will work best in
the sweet spot.
Accordingly it might be better to separate into sweet spot and “area”
applications,
as different cases.
(Home/headphone vs. concert/performance
I forgot to say: Jörn Nettingsmeier ’s experience was life changing. He really
knows about the reality of real-life in-hall use of HOA and was incredibly wise
and generous.
Great discussion with Anders Tveit were important too. Pierre Guillot’s help
with sorting the many, many issues of the
This report is very much in line with my observations too, in the concert hall
and in optimal studio conditions. I would say that HOA start to be usable for
focused point source around the 5th order, and gets better higher up with the
problems of then having the speaker setup to fill it… so
Ps if I remember rightly Peter Stitt may have done some studies comparing
vbap and ambisonics in an octoganal array at sarc you could check him out.
On Saturday, 20 April 2019, Augustine Leudar
wrote:
> I havent done a study on it but ive done hundreds of compositions and
> installations and
I havent done a study on it but ive done hundreds of compositions and
installations and the differences are pretty obvious. Ambisonics is pretty
good at filling a hole in the panning but vbap can be better under some
circumstances. Ambisonics is pretty much useles if you want to say, makes
sounds
Hello,
I'm curious if anyone knows of, or has conducted, any studies comparing an
Ambisonic system to a channel-based system? For example, a comparison of an
Auro 3-D system with an Ambisonic system. Or even just a 5.1 surround
system with an Ambisonic system.
I haven't found any studies myself
18 matches
Mail list logo
