Thanks everyone, not doing it saves a lot of faffing around!
Oh and Paul, no problem with heaters, as we can turn them off.
Only the performers, a cameraman, and I. We don’t have to keep punters warm!
Cheers
Steve
> On 12 Sep 2018, at 15:21, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 a
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 09:27:16AM -0500, David McGriffy wrote:
> Of course, the
> calibration filters for tetrahedral mics attempt to correct for this
> effect, but those filters more closely match the diffuse field average of
> all directions than the more extreme results in the direction of one
--On 11 September 2018 14:11 +0100 Steven Boardman
wrote:
> it occurred to me that it may be better to align the capsules to
> performers (where possible).
There is no direction in which the output will be just from one capsule
anyway; even if you try to select the same pattern as the capsule
co
Eero Aro wrote:
> umashankar wrote:
>> I read this many years ago so cannot remember a source, but I think
>> on-axis is not the best direction for a tetrahedral array.
> Funny that you remember that discussion, it must have been more than a
> decade ago in Sursound.
>
> I can't remember whoever
Thanks David, that makes sense.
If i kept the performers within the horizontal spread of 2 capsules, rather
than pointing at them, would there be any benefit? Ie 2 capsules axis
parallel to the horizontal plane.
So in effect the performance will be contained within 60 degrees of the 90.
Or maybe
:04:57 PM
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: Re: [Sursound] tetrahedral mic record
umashankar wrote:
> I read this many years ago so cannot remember a source, but I think
> on-axis is not the best direction for a tetrahedral array.
Funny that you remember that discussion, it must have been
umashankar wrote:
I read this many years ago so cannot remember a source, but I think
on-axis is not the best direction for a tetrahedral array.
Funny that you remember that discussion, it must have been more than a
decade ago in Sursound.
I can't remember whoever started the thread, but I aske
Actually, directly on axis of one of the capsules may be the worst
direction for a tetrahedral array. While it's true that otherwise you are
slightly off-axis for a given capsule, with whatever coloration that might
cause, I believe the non-coincidence problems of the complete array
overwhelm this
I've love to see pictures of the chapel and the mic placement.
JM
> Hi Folks
> Is it better to align performers to capsule axis, to get the best
> frequency, and noise performance from those directions, then rotate the
> b-format encode afterwards?
> I am recording at Union Chapel, with tetra
).
umashankar
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: Sursound on behalf of Steven Boardman
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 6:41:05 PM
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: [Sursound] tetrahedral mic record
Hi
Hi Folks
Is it better to align performers to capsule axis, to get the best frequency,
and noise performance from those directions, then rotate the b-format encode
afterwards?
I am recording at Union Chapel, with tetrahedral mics, and spot microphones.
The final output will be stereo and HOA.
11 matches
Mail list logo
