On 2012-10-05, Richard Furse wrote:
To be honest, low order hasn't been a massive priority for gaming/VR -
on most modern boxes we're rendering and decoding at fourth order, so
all the cool new stuff is enabled.
Tell me... In games most of the individual sound sources, apart from
general
Martin Leese wrote:
The Ambi-5 Auditorium Decoder. I have a
PDF of an Audio + Design leaflet which
somebody sent me. If people want it I can
place it on my Google Site for download.
I have placed the 1.3 MByte file:
Audio_Design_Multi-speaker_Auditorium_Decoders.pdf
in the Ambisonic stuff
A bit of a warning... Richard Furse's Ambisonic Decoding Equations
page is a useful resource, but is a bit vague on how the different
matrices should be used (or adapted).
Specifically, the coefficients listed as Rig Decode Matrix to
Reproduce Spherical Harmonics (which have also been called
-Original Message-
From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu]
On Behalf Of Paul Hodges
Sent: 05 October 2012 20:48
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Hybrid Hi-Fi (HyFi?), IRs, etc.
--On 05 October 2012 20:40 +0100 Richard Furse rich
On 3 October 2012 20:39, Andrew Horsburgh andrew.horsbu...@uws.ac.uk wrote:
Michael's right, AFAIK, that there hasn't been much modern use of beyond 5
speaker arrangements. I can't think of examples where an odd number of
speakers has been used with ambisonic that wasn't to the ITU 775
Dave Malham wrote:
In the early days, Audio Design Reading had a decoder which went to a
regular array of 5 speakers (i.e. not ITU) which, iirc worked really
quite well. I'm not at all sure if they actually sold any and the
design was,as far as I'm aware, sold on to Cepiar when ADR pulled out
Martin Leese wrote :
The Ambi-5 Auditorium Decoder. I have a
PDF of an Audio + Design leaflet which
somebody sent me. If people want it I can
place it on my Google Site for download.
However, it just says:
The Ambi-5 produces five loudspeaker feeds
arranged as a regular pentagon with
Greetings to All,
I have been reviewing the literature on Auralization in attempts to create
viable stimuli for research. Everybody here has been great. I do have another
question/comment regarding loudspeaker placement.
In nearly all Ambisonic setups, the listener's head lies on a line
Greetings to All,
I have been reviewing the literature on Auralization in attempts to create
viable stimuli for research. Everybody here has been great. I do have
another question/comment regarding loudspeaker placement.
In nearly all Ambisonic setups, the listener's head lies on a line
discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Hybrid Hi-Fi (HyFi?), IRs, etc.
Greetings to All,
I have been reviewing the literature on Auralization in attempts to create
viable stimuli for research. Everybody here has been great. I do have
another question/comment regarding loudspeaker placement
12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Hybrid Hi-Fi (HyFi?), IRs, etc.
Greetings to All,
I have been reviewing the literature on Auralization in attempts to create
viable stimuli for research. Everybody here has been great. I do have
another question/comment regarding loudspeaker placement
On 2012-10-03, Eric Carmichel wrote:
In nearly all Ambisonic setups, the listener's head lies on a line
connecting two or more speakers.
The classical regular pantophonic decoders make no such assumption, and
work just fine. For your purposes, of the five Platonic solids
unfortunately the
On 2012-10-03, Eric Carmichel wrote:
At least I got as far as 2*pi radians / 5 = 105 degrees.
To add, you can find the classical first order decoding equations for
regular polygonal layouts in either the BLaH series of papers, or
Gerzon's originals. They're all present in the Motherlode,
13 matches
Mail list logo
