Re: [Suspend-devel] powerpc support

2007-03-27 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On 3/27/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hehe, i replied on the wrong list :-) > > > With this patch people can at least compile and give us some feedback. > > ok, some comments inlined. > > > int s2ram_prepare(void) > > { > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC > > + return 0; > > +#else > >

Re: [Suspend-devel] powerpc support

2007-03-27 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Tuesday 27 of March 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:55:03 +0200 > > "Luca Tettamanti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/27/07, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is a first cut at supporting powerpc for s2*. For the s2ram bit it > > > basically removes the vb

Re: [Suspend-devel] powerpc support

2007-03-27 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hehe, i replied on the wrong list :-) > With this patch people can at least compile and give us some feedback. ok, some comments inlined. > int s2ram_prepare(void) > { > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC > + return 0; > +#else > int ret, id; > > dmi_scan(); how about: #ifdef CONFIG_PPC #d

Re: [Suspend-devel] powerpc support

2007-03-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 27 March 2007 12:09, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:55:03 +0200 > "Luca Tettamanti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 3/27/07, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is a first cut at supporting powerpc for s2*. For the s2ram bit it > > > basically removes t

Re: [Suspend-devel] powerpc support

2007-03-27 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:55:03 +0200 "Luca Tettamanti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/27/07, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a first cut at supporting powerpc for s2*. For the s2ram bit it > > basically removes the vbetool code. This has two reasons. First, there > > isn't a p

Re: [Suspend-devel] powerpc support

2007-03-27 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On 3/27/07, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a first cut at supporting powerpc for s2*. For the s2ram bit it > basically removes the vbetool code. This has two reasons. First, there > isn't a powerpc version of libx86 yet. Second, the machines that have > support for s2ram in the k

[Suspend-devel] powerpc support

2007-03-27 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, This is a first cut at supporting powerpc for s2*. For the s2ram bit it basically removes the vbetool code. This has two reasons. First, there isn't a powerpc version of libx86 yet. Second, the machines that have support for s2ram in the kernel don't need those hacks. As you noticed, I've ask