On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:24, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please look at the code in prepare(), for example. In there,
> > lzf_compress() is
> > used to take page_size bytes of data from buf, compress them and place the
> > result under the
On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please look at the code in prepare(), for example. In there, lzf_compress()
> is
> used to take page_size bytes of data from buf, compress them and place the
> result under the address block->data, with the assumption that the size of the
On Friday, 3 August 2007 00:54, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First, please just replace LZF with LZO. If LZF is unsupported, there's no
> > reason to drag it all the way.
>
> OK.
>
> > Second, you have added data copying in compress_compress()
On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, please just replace LZF with LZO. If LZF is unsupported, there's no
> reason to drag it all the way.
OK.
> Second, you have added data copying in compress_compress(), which generally
> is not desirable. Can you avoid it?
I will a
On Friday, 3 August 2007 00:31, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > IIRC noone was strongly against, so replacing lzf with lzo is the way
> > > to go...?
> >
> > Ultimately, I think it is.
>
> Rafael,
> Can you please apply the lzo support or tell me how
On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > IIRC noone was strongly against, so replacing lzf with lzo is the way
> > to go...?
>
> Ultimately, I think it is.
Rafael,
Can you please apply the lzo support or tell me how to improve it?
It makes it difficult for me to sync up each patch.
T
On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Luca wrote:
>
> http://suspend.sf.net/s2ram-support.html
>
> I've also updated the link on the documentation page.
>
> Luca
>
Thanks for such quick response!
Here is a patch for the rest of the files.
Alon.
---
diff -urNp suspend.org/README suspend/README
--- suspe
On Tue 2007-07-31 21:45:14, Luca wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue 2007-07-31 21:35:59, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > On 7/31/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hmm, IIRC we _do_ have some webmaster, already. Ok, lets keep pages in
> > > > suse wik
On 7/31/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 2007-07-31 21:35:59, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 7/31/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hmm, IIRC we _do_ have some webmaster, already. Ok, lets keep pages in
> > > suse wiki, then.
> >
> > Excuse me for not understanding s
On 7/31/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luca, could you add redirect from suspend.sf.net to s2ram wiki in
> suse? Alon knows what is required...
> Pavel
Great!
Hello Luca,
There should be a URL such as
http://suspend.s
On Tue 2007-07-31 21:35:59, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, IIRC we _do_ have some webmaster, already. Ok, lets keep pages in
> > suse wiki, then.
>
> Excuse me for not understanding such short messages...
> Are you doping the idea of link only su
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 20:30, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Right... so do you have sourceforge login? I guess we could use you as
> > > a webmaster for suspend.sf.net project ;-).
> >
> > My sf login is alonbl.
> > But I am far from being a web master... Or have the time to do this.
> > Bu
On 7/31/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, IIRC we _do_ have some webmaster, already. Ok, lets keep pages in
> suse wiki, then.
Excuse me for not understanding such short messages...
Are you doping the idea of link only suspend site and redirect from
suspend site to suse wiki?
Or y
Hi!
> > Right... so do you have sourceforge login? I guess we could use you as
> > a webmaster for suspend.sf.net project ;-).
>
> My sf login is alonbl.
> But I am far from being a web master... Or have the time to do this.
> But if you like I can put the suggested html on your site so that you
On 7/31/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right... so do you have sourceforge login? I guess we could use you as
> a webmaster for suspend.sf.net project ;-).
> Pavel
My sf login is alonbl.
But I am far from being a web ma
On Mon 2007-07-30 19:53:35, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/30/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Why do you forward people to suse URLs on whitelist?
> >> I would have expected all be forwarded to suspend.sf.net...
> >> http://en.opensuse.org/S2ram belongs to the project site... not
>
On 7/30/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why do you forward people to suse URLs on whitelist?
>> I would have expected all be forwarded to suspend.sf.net...
>> http://en.opensuse.org/S2ram belongs to the project site... not
>> distribution specific site.
> Ok, so i'm going to take
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 07:24:31PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/27/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But i am not the one to decide this, as i am only maintaining a small piece
> > of the code (mainly the whitelist).
>
> Why do you forward people to suse URLs on whitelist?
>
On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:06, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/28/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I think that the majority of core developers of the suspend package do
> > not know autoconf/automake very well, including me. That may be a problem
> > if any changes to the M
On 7/28/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I think that the majority of core developers of the suspend package do
> not know autoconf/automake very well, including me. That may be a problem
> if any changes to the Makefile etc. are needed in the future.
I can maintain this.
On Friday, 27 July 2007 22:28, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, in fact we're missing someone to take care of the project's web page,
> > too.
>
> Hmmm... I cannot help you with web stuff... :(
> But I can help you with autoconf/automake...
Well, I
On Friday 27 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, in fact we're missing someone to take care of the project's web page,
> too.
Hmmm... I cannot help you with web stuff... :(
But I can help you with autoconf/automake...
Alon
-
On Friday, 27 July 2007 19:34, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > But i am not the one to decide this, as i am only maintaining a small
> > > piece
> > > of the code (mainly the whitelist).
> >
> > Why do you forward people to suse URLs on whitelist?
>
> Because it was easier that way :-).
>
>
Hi!
> > But i am not the one to decide this, as i am only maintaining a small piece
> > of the code (mainly the whitelist).
>
> Why do you forward people to suse URLs on whitelist?
Because it was easier that way :-).
> I would have expected all be forwarded to suspend.sf.net...
> http://en.open
On 7/27/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But i am not the one to decide this, as i am only maintaining a small piece
> of the code (mainly the whitelist).
Why do you forward people to suse URLs on whitelist?
I would have expected all be forwarded to suspend.sf.net...
http://en.open
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 06:17:30PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> I suggested to provide the autoconf/automake support, but I don't wish
> to work for nothing.
I for myself don't like the autofoo stuff very much and i think it is a
major PITA for small projects.
But i am not the one to decide thi
On 7/27/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:33:15PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 7/25/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > IIRC, we discussed that in the past and decided not to do it.
> >
> > Well... Maybe now when the project advanced
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:33:15PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/25/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IIRC, we discussed that in the past and decided not to do it.
>
> Well... Maybe now when the project advanced you have new arguments?
> It will be much much easier for users
On 7/25/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IIRC, we discussed that in the past and decided not to do it.
Well... Maybe now when the project advanced you have new arguments?
It will be much much easier for users.
Alon.
--
Hi,
On Tuesday, 24 July 2007 19:51, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was afraid to ask this question...
>
> But given the options, dependencies and system configuration, it would
> be simpler (to users) an autoconf/automake build environment.
>
> If you don't have any religion thing against t
30 matches
Mail list logo
